Anonymous wrote:This may be a dumb question but my head is spinning from all the chaos — if we are made Schedule F do we lose all RIF protections?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if Dems force a shutdown where Trump
Just use that as leverage to RIF (ie, remove all non-essential employees)? I think that’s where this is headed sadly
This is right. Democrats always ignore the forrest for the trees. Are there regs? Yes, but a shutdown sets up the conditions where the regs won’t matter. We’re doomed by Dems mediocre, incremental, institutional thinking.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a take on how much work is "not specifically required by statute"? I get the sense that almost everything is required by statute. Add that the RIF laws don't really match up with Elon's vision of AI and kids replacing all experienced federal workers.
March 14 + the courts are the two things that matter the most here. To pass a CR before Pi day they will need 60 votes in the Senate OR the Rs could go nuclear and change the rules to 50 votes. To get to 60 they need Dems, who will likely stop any massive cut/RIF -- at least until Sept. 30. But if Ds push that, then a shutdown might be the grand gop plan anyway.
My bet given that Rs DGAF about any precedence: Rs go for a shutdown, RIF like crazy, blame the Ds for "ignoring their mandate", and then change the senate rules to require only 50 votes. Then they pass a CR that codifies the RIFs/budget cuts.
Best case scenario, the Dems negotiate a CR that lasts until Sept. 30. Then the hammer falls with the nex year budget.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone have a take on how much work is "not specifically required by statute"? I get the sense that almost everything is required by statute. Add that the RIF laws don't really match up with Elon's vision of AI and kids replacing all experienced federal workers.
March 14 + the courts are the two things that matter the most here. To pass a CR before Pi day they will need 60 votes in the Senate OR the Rs could go nuclear and change the rules to 50 votes. To get to 60 they need Dems, who will likely stop any massive cut/RIF -- at least until Sept. 30. But if Ds push that, then a shutdown might be the grand gop plan anyway.
My bet given that Rs DGAF about any precedence: Rs go for a shutdown, RIF like crazy, blame the Ds for "ignoring their mandate", and then change the senate rules to require only 50 votes. Then they pass a CR that codifies the RIFs/budget cuts.
Best case scenario, the Dems negotiate a CR that lasts until Sept. 30. Then the hammer falls with the nex year budget.
Anonymous wrote:I thought the GOP plan was to use "reconciliation" to pass bills without needing 60 votes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This may be a dumb question but my head is spinning from all the chaos — if we are made Schedule F do we lose all RIF protections?
yes. The point of Schedule F is to be able to fire people quickly for essentially doing their job.
I guess I naively hoped there would still be some level of protection.
There are lawsuits over Schedule F.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This may be a dumb question but my head is spinning from all the chaos — if we are made Schedule F do we lose all RIF protections?
yes. The point of Schedule F is to be able to fire people quickly for essentially doing their job.
I guess I naively hoped there would still be some level of protection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This may be a dumb question but my head is spinning from all the chaos — if we are made Schedule F do we lose all RIF protections?
yes. The point of Schedule F is to be able to fire people quickly for essentially doing their job.
Anonymous wrote:So if Dems force a shutdown where Trump
Just use that as leverage to RIF (ie, remove all non-essential employees)? I think that’s where this is headed sadly
Anonymous wrote:This may be a dumb question but my head is spinning from all the chaos — if we are made Schedule F do we lose all RIF protections?