Anonymous wrote:Garbage people. Deplorables was too kind.

We think you people are garbage, too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LIES LIES LIES

Even SECDEF is owning up to this, your spin isn't working Svetlana.

What are you talking about? You clearly have never worked in a library. I'm talking about local branches, not the Library of Congress. No local branch has room to store everything ever published in the history of recorded time. We get it, you're incapable of a civilized conversation. Go beat your head against the wall if it'll make you feel better, or eat a couple of Twinkies, whatever you need to do to calm yourself down.

Garbage people. Deplorables was too kind.

Anonymous wrote:LIES LIES LIES

Even SECDEF is owning up to this, your spin isn't working Svetlana.

What are you talking about? You clearly have never worked in a library. I'm talking about local branches, not the Library of Congress. No local branch has room to store everything ever published in the history of recorded time. We get it, you're incapable of a civilized conversation. Go beat your head against the wall if it'll make you feel better, or eat a couple of Twinkies, whatever you need to do to calm yourself down.

Anonymous wrote:I know the disingenuousness works on your mid peers, but it's pathetic. I'm not going to dignify this deliberate misinformation spin with a response.

Oh, no?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the books being weeded are falsely alleged to have an agenda, than it isn't weeding, it is book banning and censorship. How about just leave all the books there and stop weeding?

It usually has to do with removing older editions, duplicate copies, damaged items, and items that have not circulated for years. Nothing nefarious about it, it's just part of maintaining a collection and making room for new acquisitions.

LIES LIES LIES

Even SECDEF is owning up to this, your spin isn't working Svetlana.

Anonymous wrote:When the books being weeded are falsely alleged to have an agenda, than it isn't weeding, it is book banning and censorship. How about just leave all the books there and stop weeding?

It usually has to do with removing older editions, duplicate copies, damaged items, and items that have not circulated for years. Nothing nefarious about it, it's just part of maintaining a collection and making room for new acquisitions.

Anonymous wrote:You do know libraries occasionally remove outdated books from their collection? It's called weeding. Or do you prefer to call it censorship?

I know the disingenuousness works on your mid peers, but it's pathetic. I'm not going to dignify this deliberate misinformation spin with a response. Hegseth himself has said that he wants specific books out of school that don't fit with his version of the world. If I'm lucky, maybe my kids can be serial adulterers, married three times with two baby mamas, live 16 hours away from half of their kids and steal money from organizations while being carried out drunk. One can dream...

You bet I'm mad. Trash people with false values.

Anonymous wrote:You do know libraries occasionally remove outdated books from their collection? It's called weeding. Or do you prefer to call it censorship?

When the books being weeded are falsely alleged to have an agenda, than it isn't weeding, it is book banning and censorship. How about just leave all the books there and stop weeding?

Anonymous wrote:It gave Elon the mouthpiece he needed to spread propaganda....never should have sold it. We would be in a very different place now.

You mean how the Russians and Saudi's funded elon's purchase at ridiculously inflated values to buy the world's biggest platform so Musk could steal an election on behalf of his funders?

You do know libraries occasionally remove outdated books from their collection? It's called weeding. Or do you prefer to call it censorship?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ah, paper thin skinned MAGA. Can never answer a real question when pinned down, but always use the same old tropes. We are headed right for an iceberg and they can't answer a single honest conversation.

U mad, bro?

Of course I'm mad, and I can be genuine in my interactions. I truly can't imagine spewing all the garbage like you do. Do you have these refrains on rotation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Or you could say liberated US instead. Social media without censorship. Sounds like a very American concept.

But daily life with censorship is okay? My kids DoD teachers can no longer say a whole list of words anymore, their libraries have to remove books and clubs like Society of Black Engineers and the Gay/Straight Alliance can no longer exist, in a public, secular (until now) school payed for with taxpayer dollars! First amendment absolutists my a#s.

You people are such frauds and no one buys any of it except yourselves.

Wait, are you for or against censorship? I'm so confused. You people change your stance every other post.

Answer the question. I am against censorship. Are on board with what they are doing in DoD Schools? Yes or No?

NP, but yes. The federal government should not be engaging in any segregation. That includes the “infinity” groups that schools love to use to divide and segregate students.

That isn’t censorship it, it’s stopping segregation and racism.

Affinity groups are optional, nobody is forced in

One of our most glaring problems is that 54% of Americans read below a 6th grade reading level. People supporting gov't censorship don't know the difference between infinity and affinity. It's a real crisis in lack of critical thinkings skills paired with social media propaganda.

And who has been in charge of public schools?

The states. And DoD has been the highest ranking school system in the country. Are you okay with dismantling that in favor of quasi Christian ideology and censorship? Are you okay with banning books that have been in the library for 20 years???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Also Facebook. They were a huge reason Trump got elected in 2016. Delete both of them.

This. I hardly use Facebook. Even the memes making political jokes are toxic. I will probably delete my account this year

I did right before the election. It feels great. I highly recommend it. Nothing that site does is worth supporting Zuck - he’s ruined the US and many other countries. He literally ignored human slave trading on Instagram and propaganda that caused so much suffering around the world because it “reduced engagement “. He’s a trash person trashing our world.

Anonymous wrote:Ah, paper thin skinned MAGA. Can never answer a real question when pinned down, but always use the same old tropes. We are headed right for an iceberg and they can't answer a single honest conversation.

U mad, bro?

Ah, paper thin skinned MAGA. Can never answer a real question when pinned down, but always use the same old tropes. We are headed right for an iceberg and they can't answer a single honest conversation.