Anonymous wrote:They all seem like very good, somewhat preppy and classic New England schools.
How do they differ?
Anonymous wrote:Bowdoin is similar to Williams and Amherst.
Middlebury is similar to Hamilton and Varsar.
The other two are similar to Bucknell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bowdoin is similar to Williams and Amherst.
Middlebury is similar to Hamilton and Vassar.
The other two are similar to Bucknell.
Amherst, Bowdoin, Middlebury and Williams all have a very similar academic profile with avg SAT scores between 1500-1520 and acceptance levels of 8-10% or so
Hamilton and Vassar are just slightly below them with acceptance levels of 12-18%
Colby is probably slightly below this set but they haven't released a CDS in awhile.
Bates is a level down in terms of admit stats but similar in selectivity to Hamilton and Vassar. Their academic stats are far above Bucknell which is also an excellent school.
Anonymous wrote:Bowdoin is similar to Williams and Amherst.
Middlebury is similar to Hamilton and Vassar.
The other two are similar to Bucknell.
Anonymous wrote:No comparison between Bowdoin and Bates. Our Bates tour guide was very low IQ and the info session bragged about how they have some mid-semester block were kids get to read in hammocks. It seems like they offer a LOT of opportunities to low income students. There is no way in hell I am paying for my kid and you to read in hammocks for credit. GTFO
Anonymous wrote:No comparison between Bowdoin and Bates. Our Bates tour guide was very low IQ and the info session bragged about how they have some mid-semester block were kids get to read in hammocks. It seems like they offer a LOT of opportunities to low income students. There is no way in hell I am paying for my kid and you to read in hammocks for credit. GTFO
Anonymous wrote:All the schools are pretty similar and one would have a similar experience.
Middlebury has by far has the best reputation in the corporate world and best name recognition abroad.