Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the first 6 months: Tell him “no.” State your opinions firmly. Don’t rescue him if he finds himself in a tough situation of his own creation.
The problem is that in the early stages of a relationship women are taught to not need anything and to give everything bc the goal used to be to catch a man. Even a crappy man was better than being a spinster and women are still socialized with that mindset.
The reality is that the early stages of the relationship are the place where you need to push back, say no, be unhelpful. Because a weak, selfish man will be utterly infuriated and will either show his weakness so you can dump him or he will weed himself out. A man worth your time can hear no and be respectful about it. He won’t automatically reject opinions offered by women. If he messes up, he will understand that it’s his responsibility to solve it.
Don’t do anything for a new boyfriend that you wouldn’t do for a newish friend. If Denise from marketing was sick would you go over and take her temperature hourly and make her soup and clean her apartment while you’re there? No. You would text her a get-well message, maybe drop off soup, and check in after a few days to see if she is on the mend. Treat a boyfriend like that. If he is likes you as a person it won’t drive him away; if he only likes you for your labor then good riddance!
I would advise both my son and daughter to dump someone who treated them like this. This should have self respect and expect respect in a relationship and treat others with respect.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the first 6 months: Tell him “no.” State your opinions firmly. Don’t rescue him if he finds himself in a tough situation of his own creation.
The problem is that in the early stages of a relationship women are taught to not need anything and to give everything bc the goal used to be to catch a man. Even a crappy man was better than being a spinster and women are still socialized with that mindset.
The reality is that the early stages of the relationship are the place where you need to push back, say no, be unhelpful. Because a weak, selfish man will be utterly infuriated and will either show his weakness so you can dump him or he will weed himself out. A man worth your time can hear no and be respectful about it. He won’t automatically reject opinions offered by women. If he messes up, he will understand that it’s his responsibility to solve it.
Don’t do anything for a new boyfriend that you wouldn’t do for a newish friend. If Denise from marketing was sick would you go over and take her temperature hourly and make her soup and clean her apartment while you’re there? No. You would text her a get-well message, maybe drop off soup, and check in after a few days to see if she is on the mend. Treat a boyfriend like that. If he is likes you as a person it won’t drive him away; if he only likes you for your labor then good riddance!
Most women won't want a boyfriend who treats them the same way you are describing. Someone who pushes back, says no, is unhelpful, treats his girlfriend like Denise from marketing. If someone posted on here that their boyfriend of 6 months was acting the way you suggest people act, she would be given the advice to dump him.
NP, but yeah because... men and women are different? Men are socialized to be selfish, that it's okay to be loud and focus on themselves. Wome are socialized to be aware of the group, to be empathetic and self sacrificing and nice. So yes, men need, often, to be trained to put the other person first whereas women often need to train themselves to put themselves first. It's the same reason the "male loneliness crisis" exists, because men cannot maintain friendships with other men because they dont really engage in reciprocal behavior. Both sides are being selfish so the friendship is shallow and unfulfilling. Women dont suffer from the same issue because they habitually put the other person before them, think of what they'd like/enjoy, connect with them emotionally. Women need to basically learn to take a step back from constantly "fixing" the relationship or other person and exist in an attitude of selfishness, and men need to learn the total opposite.
So much sexism in one post. Women and men both need to respect ohers and be treated with respect. Neither needs to fix the other but both should be supportive. There is no one way that women act and men act in relationships. Both sexes run the gamet of personalities and how they treat others and how selfish or unselfish they are. There is no need to "train" anyone. Teach your kids to treat others with respect and to expect respect in return. Teach both your sons and daughters to assert themselves, and to know what a healthy relationship looks like and how to take responsibility for themselves and their choices. As adults, make those choices for yourself. Neither should put up with disrespect or a non supportive or unequal partner.
Anonymous wrote:In the first 6 months: Tell him “no.” State your opinions firmly. Don’t rescue him if he finds himself in a tough situation of his own creation.
The problem is that in the early stages of a relationship women are taught to not need anything and to give everything bc the goal used to be to catch a man. Even a crappy man was better than being a spinster and women are still socialized with that mindset.
The reality is that the early stages of the relationship are the place where you need to push back, say no, be unhelpful. Because a weak, selfish man will be utterly infuriated and will either show his weakness so you can dump him or he will weed himself out. A man worth your time can hear no and be respectful about it. He won’t automatically reject opinions offered by women. If he messes up, he will understand that it’s his responsibility to solve it.
Don’t do anything for a new boyfriend that you wouldn’t do for a newish friend. If Denise from marketing was sick would you go over and take her temperature hourly and make her soup and clean her apartment while you’re there? No. You would text her a get-well message, maybe drop off soup, and check in after a few days to see if she is on the mend. Treat a boyfriend like that. If he is likes you as a person it won’t drive him away; if he only likes you for your labor then good riddance!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the first 6 months: Tell him “no.” State your opinions firmly. Don’t rescue him if he finds himself in a tough situation of his own creation.
The problem is that in the early stages of a relationship women are taught to not need anything and to give everything bc the goal used to be to catch a man. Even a crappy man was better than being a spinster and women are still socialized with that mindset.
The reality is that the early stages of the relationship are the place where you need to push back, say no, be unhelpful. Because a weak, selfish man will be utterly infuriated and will either show his weakness so you can dump him or he will weed himself out. A man worth your time can hear no and be respectful about it. He won’t automatically reject opinions offered by women. If he messes up, he will understand that it’s his responsibility to solve it.
Don’t do anything for a new boyfriend that you wouldn’t do for a newish friend. If Denise from marketing was sick would you go over and take her temperature hourly and make her soup and clean her apartment while you’re there? No. You would text her a get-well message, maybe drop off soup, and check in after a few days to see if she is on the mend. Treat a boyfriend like that. If he is likes you as a person it won’t drive him away; if he only likes you for your labor then good riddance!
Most women won't want a boyfriend who treats them the same way you are describing. Someone who pushes back, says no, is unhelpful, treats his girlfriend like Denise from marketing. If someone posted on here that their boyfriend of 6 months was acting the way you suggest people act, she would be given the advice to dump him.
NP, but yeah because... men and women are different? Men are socialized to be selfish, that it's okay to be loud and focus on themselves. Wome are socialized to be aware of the group, to be empathetic and self sacrificing and nice. So yes, men need, often, to be trained to put the other person first whereas women often need to train themselves to put themselves first. It's the same reason the "male loneliness crisis" exists, because men cannot maintain friendships with other men because they dont really engage in reciprocal behavior. Both sides are being selfish so the friendship is shallow and unfulfilling. Women dont suffer from the same issue because they habitually put the other person before them, think of what they'd like/enjoy, connect with them emotionally. Women need to basically learn to take a step back from constantly "fixing" the relationship or other person and exist in an attitude of selfishness, and men need to learn the total opposite.[/quote
So much sexism in one post. Women and men both need to respect ohers and be treated with respect. Neither needs to fix the other but both should be supportive. There is no one way that women act and men act in relationships. Both sexes run the gamet of personalities and how they treat others and how selfish or unselfish they are. There is no need to "train" anyone. Teach your kids to treat others with respect and to expect respect in return. Teach both your sons and daughters to assert themselves, and to know what a healthy relationship looks like and how to take responsibility for themselves and their choices. As adults, make those choices for yourself. Neither should put up with disrespect or a non supportive or unequal partner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In the first 6 months: Tell him “no.” State your opinions firmly. Don’t rescue him if he finds himself in a tough situation of his own creation.
The problem is that in the early stages of a relationship women are taught to not need anything and to give everything bc the goal used to be to catch a man. Even a crappy man was better than being a spinster and women are still socialized with that mindset.
The reality is that the early stages of the relationship are the place where you need to push back, say no, be unhelpful. Because a weak, selfish man will be utterly infuriated and will either show his weakness so you can dump him or he will weed himself out. A man worth your time can hear no and be respectful about it. He won’t automatically reject opinions offered by women. If he messes up, he will understand that it’s his responsibility to solve it.
Don’t do anything for a new boyfriend that you wouldn’t do for a newish friend. If Denise from marketing was sick would you go over and take her temperature hourly and make her soup and clean her apartment while you’re there? No. You would text her a get-well message, maybe drop off soup, and check in after a few days to see if she is on the mend. Treat a boyfriend like that. If he is likes you as a person it won’t drive him away; if he only likes you for your labor then good riddance!
Most women won't want a boyfriend who treats them the same way you are describing. Someone who pushes back, says no, is unhelpful, treats his girlfriend like Denise from marketing. If someone posted on here that their boyfriend of 6 months was acting the way you suggest people act, she would be given the advice to dump him.
Anonymous wrote:In the first 6 months: Tell him “no.” State your opinions firmly. Don’t rescue him if he finds himself in a tough situation of his own creation.
The problem is that in the early stages of a relationship women are taught to not need anything and to give everything bc the goal used to be to catch a man. Even a crappy man was better than being a spinster and women are still socialized with that mindset.
The reality is that the early stages of the relationship are the place where you need to push back, say no, be unhelpful. Because a weak, selfish man will be utterly infuriated and will either show his weakness so you can dump him or he will weed himself out. A man worth your time can hear no and be respectful about it. He won’t automatically reject opinions offered by women. If he messes up, he will understand that it’s his responsibility to solve it.
Don’t do anything for a new boyfriend that you wouldn’t do for a newish friend. If Denise from marketing was sick would you go over and take her temperature hourly and make her soup and clean her apartment while you’re there? No. You would text her a get-well message, maybe drop off soup, and check in after a few days to see if she is on the mend. Treat a boyfriend like that. If he is likes you as a person it won’t drive him away; if he only likes you for your labor then good riddance!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hold out until you find the perfect man who meets 100% of your long list of requirements. A lot of women do that.
Of course, the rate of unmarried single women has gone up lately.. but at least they aren't settling for less than ideal circumstances.
Is this a joke? Women’s unrealistic dating standards are already overwhelmingly responsible for the current broken dating market. In our “cheap sex” culture, of course some man who is a 10 was willing to bang a woman who is a 6 a few times. Now the 6 forevermore thinks she deserves to be married to a 10, not understanding that there’s a difference between who men will sleep with when they’re horny and who they will make a lifetime commitment to.
Advising women to hold out for “the perfect man who meets 100% of [their] long list of requirements” is actually insane. Do you think your dad was a 100% perfect Prince Charming? No, he was a human being with flaws, just like your mom—and yet society thrived with these matches.
Let's take education as a simple case. A woman who went to college probably wants a man who also went to college. But, university enrollment at the undergrad level at most universities is 60-40 male-female. So just on that measure, and it's not a lot to ask for, and it's 3 women competing for 2 men.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And if my brother or son was the type of person to sit around while his spouse worked I for darn sure hope he wouldn’t be with the kind of doormat who enables this behavior and— worse— teaches boys that’s how they can behave. I expect my daughter to have extremely high standards.
If your son behaved this way, it would have been you who would have taught him how.
Again is there any male behavior for which you don’t blame women?
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who would go on The Bachelor or similar shows are not ordinary having ordinary relationships.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s because with co-workers it’s called having high expectations or having boundaries, depending on the circumstances. If a woman expects her direct reports to be on time and produce high quality work, she’s a boss, if she has expectations for her husband? A bI+ch.
Your post does not make sense. Expectations are one thing. Being a bi+ch is another. And you know the difference.
I do. Men on this board and the sort of men who string women along certainly don’t seem to. High expectations, high standards, and no compromises are the ways women avoid being strung along.
Anonymous wrote:It’s because with co-workers it’s called having high expectations or having boundaries, depending on the circumstances. If a woman expects her direct reports to be on time and produce high quality work, she’s a boss, if she has expectations for her husband? A bI+ch.
Your post does not make sense. Expectations are one thing. Being a bi+ch is another. And you know the difference.