Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
SYC is shifting all their energy to the girl's side. GA all the way.
Score was 1-0. Lots of errors in score inputs
Nope- wrong. The score was 3-0 in the first 10 minutes. The final score was 11-0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
SYC is shifting all their energy to the girl's side. GA all the way.
Score was 1-0. Lots of errors in score inputs
Nope- wrong. The score was 3-0 in the first 10 minutes. The final score was 11-0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
Score was 1-0. Lots of errors in score inputs
Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
Anonymous wrote:Chiefs lost 38-0 in a meaningless game to them this season, I guess they suck too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
Score was 1-0. Lots of errors in score inputs
syc 2010 still sucks need overhall roster kids can't put together 2 passing terrible
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
Score was 1-0. Lots of errors in score inputs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
That's really bad and no excuses can explained that result.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
SYC 08 lost 11-0.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next
You must have something against SYC and specifically 2010 to call out 2010. Double check the score again and you'l see SYC 2010 beat Beach FC ENCL 2-0. Beach FC 2010 is top seed in ECNL aren't they?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I was there. Some of the MLS Next teams must have had most of their players committed already therefore only played their subs. The results don't mean anything. It was the event that drew the most elite school coaches in my experience. If only my son didn't get sick last week.
That’s why SYC lost 11-0? Because they are resting commits?
include syc 2010 lost all matches, what an embarrassment for local mls next