Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…
Which private do you think would appeal to a kid looking at Michigan (and don't say Ivy b/c they want a big school experience)? USC, of course, but their acceptance rate is painfully low.
Anonymous wrote:The terminology really doesn't matter. OP clearly meant flagship to be the most selective state school in the state.
The fact that Michigan is 50% OOS and Georgia Tech only 10% is most pertinent, and suggests that being OOS at GT could be socially isolating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Joining a fraternity is the solution to the social challenges of attending an OOS public. The forced togetherness of pledgeship will help him forge bonds quickly and potentially assimilate into pre-existing friend groups (given that high school friends often rush the same house). Within 8-10 weeks, he'll go from being the awkward new guy that no one knows to being a god on campus who gets into the best parties and has the best girls wanting to date him. Statistically, he'll also have a higher GPA and better networking opportunities than if he remains a GDI.
Ugh, this advice was the absolute wrong thing to convince me that OOS flagships are a good idea. My DC is not the greek type.
Thanks so much for your response, though! Very helpful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…
Which private do you think would appeal to a kid looking at Michigan (and don't say Ivy b/c they want a big school experience)? USC, of course, but their acceptance rate is painfully low.
Anonymous wrote:The terminology really doesn't matter. OP clearly meant flagship to be the most selective state school in the state.
The fact that Michigan is 50% OOS and Georgia Tech only 10% is most pertinent, and suggests that being OOS at GT could be socially isolating.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not a bad deal if you are full-pay because OOS is still less than full-pay private which is now approaching $96k at privates like USC
OK, but aren't the resources available for students at state flagships significantly lower than at top privates?
And how does it matter that the peer group (and eventual alumni network) is so geographically focused?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not a bad deal if you are full-pay because OOS is still less than full-pay private which is now approachong $96k at privates like USC
Michigan is 80K, which sure that's cheaper than 96, it's still on par with a great many private institutions.
And Calpoly is like 27K, so not even 10 grand more than UVA. So?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…
Which private do you think would appeal to a kid looking at Michigan (and don't say Ivy b/c they want a big school experience)? USC, of course, but their acceptance rate is painfully low.
Lots of places that are academically oriented, not tiny, nationally known/ prestigious: Northwestern, Johns Hopkins, Cornell, Duke. Less selective: NYU, Syracuse, Carnegie Mellon, Tulane etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…
Which private do you think would appeal to a kid looking at Michigan (and don't say Ivy b/c they want a big school experience)? USC, of course, but their acceptance rate is painfully low.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DC is waiting to hear from Michigan and Georgia Tech -- both of which have much lower acceptance rates for OOS applicants and, to varying degrees, enroll a (small) minority of out of state students.
What's the OOS experience like? Tuition is much higher for OOS and the median OOS student more qualified. Seems like a bad deal to me, especially if you think that part of what you are paying for is a peer group. Am I wrong?
Michigan is not a good deal at an average of 82k per year (not 80, as it goes up 4k for upperclassmen). You are paying to say you go to a “top school” which is far easier to get into oos than, say, Texas...if you are paying private school tuition, go private!
Georgia Tech is a whole different animal because oos tuition is 30k less…