Anonymous wrote:I wouldn’t even trust this guy to house sit for me. This is embarrassing and insulting for America - the worst people.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like you clicked on the wrong thread, friend. Sorry that your back key is so hard to reach for you.
I most certainly clicked the right thread. Grievance culture is toxic to your health. People here have no control over the fate of Hegseth. Perseverating on his morals or qualifications gets nothing accomplished. This is performance art. Go for a walk.
NP. So you don't think citizens should call their senators saying they don't want a drunkard running the military, who is clearly lying? He couldn't even answer Mark Kelly - How can you have overcome hardship if everything is an anonymous smear campaign? You know these appointments affect Americans. Maybe if more people took the time to watch...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many of Trump's selections are awful, but there is only one that is truly traitorous, and that is Gabbard. If the rest go through and they can stop her, then so be it. God help us if she ends up in her appointed position.
Hi Hillary!
Such a lame reply. Gabbard is unfit and a traitor. She openly pushed Russian propaganda and support Assad in Syria… you know the “leader” who used chemical weapons on his own citizens.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like you clicked on the wrong thread, friend. Sorry that your back key is so hard to reach for you.
I most certainly clicked the right thread. Grievance culture is toxic to your health. People here have no control over the fate of Hegseth. Perseverating on his morals or qualifications gets nothing accomplished. This is performance art. Go for a walk.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does he keep using the phrase “war fighters”? Is that to distinguish active duty from non active duty?
No because soldier is usually associated with Army and these days combat is much broader; like a drone operator.
But there are many who serve in areas that aren't "war fighting," so how is it broader? It seems to be neglecting a lot of people in uniform.
Anonymous wrote:It’s really mind-boggling that people with moral backgrounds like this guy can even have the balls to mention their spouse. Bro, your track record of violating every single underpinning of family values requires you to STFU, or at least say as little as possible, about the current family structure that you just haven had sufficient time to burn down yet.
Good lord …
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does he keep using the phrase “war fighters”? Is that to distinguish active duty from non active duty?
No because soldier is usually associated with Army and these days combat is much broader; like a drone operator.
Anonymous wrote:Why does he keep using the phrase “war fighters”? Is that to distinguish active duty from non active duty?