Anonymous wrote:Alexandra Robbins - I hope you’re reading all of this and can help the community at RCV.
Anonymous wrote:Winter isn’t a good person. He has sexually harrassed teachers (reported to MCPS and swept under the rug), only cares about his favorite students and doesn’t even try to engage with anyone else, and has blatantly lied to parents. He was incredibly rude to me when my child was there. I know many parents who actively dislike him. Teachers don’t like him unless he plays favorites towards them, too.
It’s not just this incident.
He needs a central office job or to just go do something else. He shouldn’t be in a school anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's clear this guy has some defenders on DCUM. Maybe it's himself, maybe it's MCPS trying to do damage control. I suggest those interested in this case read the actual news reports.
News reports aren’t always accurate and I don’t believe Winter has ever commented or shared his thoughts of what happened.
The Judge dismissed this and she’s been on the bench for over 15 years and a Harvard grad too. MCPS says he is cleared to return.
My guess is Winter is not the same after enduring everything that’s happened and he’s going to be the AP not the principal. As a parent at RCV with two young children, I believe he should be allowed to serve as AP.
Anonymous wrote:So I'm confused: court cleared him, MCPS has cleared him, but let's continue to punish him by not allowing him to resume his job? Seems like he was being effective at his job before the accusations. Accusations are just that until the facts are revealed and a decision is made. The decision has been made based on the facts. Time to allow him to move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I'm confused: court cleared him, MCPS has cleared him, but let's continue to punish him by not allowing him to resume his job? Seems like he was being effective at his job before the accusations. Accusations are just that until the facts are revealed and a decision is made. The decision has been made based on the facts. Time to allow him to move on.
+1000!
-1000 you don’t actually know the facts. This could have been swept under the rug by MCPS. Why no jury??
Anonymous wrote:It's clear this guy has some defenders on DCUM. Maybe it's himself, maybe it's MCPS trying to do damage control. I suggest those interested in this case read the actual news reports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I'm confused: court cleared him, MCPS has cleared him, but let's continue to punish him by not allowing him to resume his job? Seems like he was being effective at his job before the accusations. Accusations are just that until the facts are revealed and a decision is made. The decision has been made based on the facts. Time to allow him to move on.
+1000!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So I'm confused: court cleared him, MCPS has cleared him, but let's continue to punish him by not allowing him to resume his job? Seems like he was being effective at his job before the accusations. Accusations are just that until the facts are revealed and a decision is made. The decision has been made based on the facts. Time to allow him to move on.
+1000!
Anonymous wrote:So I'm confused: court cleared him, MCPS has cleared him, but let's continue to punish him by not allowing him to resume his job? Seems like he was being effective at his job before the accusations. Accusations are just that until the facts are revealed and a decision is made. The decision has been made based on the facts. Time to allow him to move on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just because there is not enough evidence to convict him does not convince me that he should be around small children.
Even if it’s not true?
The video. Speaks for itself
The video does not show he hit the child’s foot. The judge noted that the child does not react as if his foot was ever hit.
Enough already. He lost his school, was arrested, case was dismissed or he was acquitted, and MCPS seems lucky that he didn’t sue them for how things were handled.
I believe it’s time to move on and allow him to return. No doubt he will be micromanaged and watched.
I actually Hope the family sues mcps. And wouldn’t Mr winter be suing mcpd ? What does mcps have to do with his arrest and the charges ? Nothing at all
Oh grow up. The parents clearly don’t know how to parent, and are mad that once their kid can’t do everything he wants and someone disciplines him, they should sue?? No way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just because there is not enough evidence to convict him does not convince me that he should be around small children.
Even if it’s not true?
The video. Speaks for itself
The video does not show he hit the child’s foot. The judge noted that the child does not react as if his foot was ever hit.
Enough already. He lost his school, was arrested, case was dismissed or he was acquitted, and MCPS seems lucky that he didn’t sue them for how things were handled.
I believe it’s time to move on and allow him to return. No doubt he will be micromanaged and watched.
I actually Hope the family sues mcps. And wouldn’t Mr winter be suing mcpd ? What does mcps have to do with his arrest and the charges ? Nothing at all
Oh grow up. The parents clearly don’t know how to parent, and are mad that once their kid can’t do everything he wants and someone disciplines him, they should sue?? No way.