Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are correct. I think some of this, especially in the DC area, is that a lot of these parents went to these highly ranked schools back when it was a lot easier to get into them (not as many kids going to college, fewer looking at schools outside their region). And they think any success they have in life is a result of going to a particular college and/or are unaware at how much less selective their own school used to be. While also being completely unaware of the opportunities available at not-so-selective schools and somehow not noticing that lots of their peers likely went up a wide range of schools.
NYU, for example, currently #30 has a 9% acceptance rate. In the 90s it had a 65% acceptance rate. USC is 10% and was 70% in the 90s.
The T30 or bust families would faint at the idea of their kid don't to a 65%+ acceptance rate college with at the same time being proud of their own degrees and happy with their experience at schools that were that high when they went.
And NYU is looked down upon by many here because of its relatively easy ED admission standards and its LS backdoor program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People chase after anything perceived as the best or prestige VIP. It’s why we have idiots driving recalled Cybertrucks
This.
It’s the insecure/brand-chasing parents. They want to brag and keep up with the Joneses.
Agree that I’d give a closer look to the resume of a state school grad with excellent internships over a top name school kid.
-An HYP grad
What if the top name school kid has excellent internships too and you can only select one for an interview?
NP. I've been an F500 recruiter for MBA interns. Never heard of an internship process that interviewed only one person.
Typically there are campus teams and if a campus is visited at all there will be a full day of interviews.
When the economy is bad, the list of visited campuses slims down. In my industry, that usually means slims down to the campuses that yield the most hires. Which can mean jettisoning the more elite schools where students are less likely to accept an offer.
Students are evaluated on personal characteristics and knowledge once they have gotten an interview. School stops mattering once you are in the pipeline. In the olden days, there was some formulaic salary discrimination (schools like Wharton led to $K more in offers) but I believe that is gone.
One of the most impressive candidates and liars whom I recruited was a former Goldman Sachs analyst. We offered him a job based on his interview and resume. I can't convey succinctly the back story on his later revealed in-interview lying but it was memorable in a bad way. There clearly is an extra level of polish on candidates from elite schools and elite employers. But sometimes it's the kind of polish that leads to corporate bankruptcies, global financial crises, and Occupy Wall Street. An ex-McKinsey executive CEO drove my grandfather's lifetime F500 employer straight into the ditch by betting wrong on nearly every big strategic decision that was made. My conclusion is that these prestige companies don't really deserve their reputations for excellence. They are mostly about smarts, greed, and strivery conformity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP there's a lot of talk about prestige and bragging rights but it goes beyond that. You're aware of Oxford, Cambridge, The Sorbonne, university of Bologna etc?
What do you think comes of attending those? You are surrounded by the "best minds" and you make connections with those people, you form a creative or business network that you carry with you out into the world.
I have a friend who attended Harvard and never mentions it, avoids it if possible. Yet her network of friends and colleagues who she met there still exist and they are all doing extraordinarily well and can occasionally help each other out.
Is this unique to Harvard though? You get that at a lot of schools. I mean Penn State is supposed to have an amazing alumni network.
Anonymous wrote:You are correct. I think some of this, especially in the DC area, is that a lot of these parents went to these highly ranked schools back when it was a lot easier to get into them (not as many kids going to college, fewer looking at schools outside their region). And they think any success they have in life is a result of going to a particular college and/or are unaware at how much less selective their own school used to be. While also being completely unaware of the opportunities available at not-so-selective schools and somehow not noticing that lots of their peers likely went up a wide range of schools.
NYU, for example, currently #30 has a 9% acceptance rate. In the 90s it had a 65% acceptance rate. USC is 10% and was 70% in the 90s.
The T30 or bust families would faint at the idea of their kid don't to a 65%+ acceptance rate college with at the same time being proud of their own degrees and happy with their experience at schools that were that high when they went.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP there's a lot of talk about prestige and bragging rights but it goes beyond that. You're aware of Oxford, Cambridge, The Sorbonne, university of Bologna etc?
What do you think comes of attending those? You are surrounded by the "best minds" and you make connections with those people, you form a creative or business network that you carry with you out into the world.
I have a friend who attended Harvard and never mentions it, avoids it if possible. Yet her network of friends and colleagues who she met there still exist and they are all doing extraordinarily well and can occasionally help each other out.
Is this unique to Harvard though? You get that at a lot of schools. I mean Penn State is supposed to have an amazing alumni network.
Anonymous wrote:OP, step away from DCUM and you’ll find this isn’t real life.
Anonymous wrote:There is a drop in dignity and respect given once your kid goes to a uni ranked beyond around #70 that I have witnessed. People don't say anything, of course, but behind others backs they judge. For LACs it's a lot less clear cut, I think, since many people don't know LACs as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People chase after anything perceived as the best or prestige VIP. It’s why we have idiots driving recalled Cybertrucks
This.
It’s the insecure/brand-chasing parents. They want to brag and keep up with the Joneses.
Agree that I’d give a closer look to the resume of a state school grad with excellent internships over a top name school kid.
-An HYP grad
What if the top name school kid has excellent internships too and you can only select one for an interview?
Anonymous wrote:OP there's a lot of talk about prestige and bragging rights but it goes beyond that. You're aware of Oxford, Cambridge, The Sorbonne, university of Bologna etc?
What do you think comes of attending those? You are surrounded by the "best minds" and you make connections with those people, you form a creative or business network that you carry with you out into the world.
I have a friend who attended Harvard and never mentions it, avoids it if possible. Yet her network of friends and colleagues who she met there still exist and they are all doing extraordinarily well and can occasionally help each other out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People chase after anything perceived as the best or prestige VIP. It’s why we have idiots driving recalled Cybertrucks
This.
It’s the insecure/brand-chasing parents. They want to brag and keep up with the Joneses.
Agree that I’d give a closer look to the resume of a state school grad with excellent internships over a top name school kid.
-An HYP grad
What if the top name school kid has excellent internships too and you can only select one for an interview?