Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The formatting is killing my brain, so reordered.
First Tier
Harvey Mudd, MIT, CalTech, UPenn, Stanford, Harvard
Second Tier
Dartmouth, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Carnegie Mellon, Yale, Claremont McKenna, Georgetown, UChicago, Columbia, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, Rice, Cornell, Berkeley, NYU,
Third Tier
Wasington & Lee, Bowdoin, Georgia Tech, Northeastern, Notre Dame, BU, Pomona, Amherst, Villanova, USC, Emory, Williams, Swarthmore, Barnard, Colgate, Wake Forest, Middlebury, BU, UVA, Tufts, WashU at St. Louis, Wellesley
Fourth Tier
Trinity (TX), Bucknell, Wesleyan, Brandeis, Lehigh, Michigan, UT Austin, Colby, Brown, UCLA, Davidson, Rochester, Wisconsin, Haverford, Case Western, Bates, UNC, Bryn Mawr, Illinois, UC San Diego, Hamilton, Richmond, UMiami, Florida, William & Mary, Kenyon, Georgia, Vassar
Fifth Tier
Tulane, Macalester, Carleton, Grinnell, Smith, Colorado
I'm a partner in a top consulting firm and don't really agree with this list during our recruiting efforts. I'd probably move many in the third tier up to 2nd, and others down to 4th. Same with 2nd and 4th tier. Other than the first tier, I largely disagree with this list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. OP stole this from
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/16tenex/revealed_employer_preferences_in_t50ish_colleges/
2. It's College Scorecard data.
The College Scorecard dataset only considers data from students receiving federal student aid.
Several groups are left out,
including undocumented and international students,
on top of those in more financially advantageous situations
It also doesn't consider cost of living in the area of employment.
Yeah this data is not really worth discussing.
Not really worth discussing? Other than the literal majority of American households who qualify under this umbrella.
“Literal” and “majority” do not mean what you seem to think they mean. A literal majority of American households do not fall under this umbrella.
You don’t think a majority of American households qualify for any financial aid?
Yeah, sure. Stay in the UMC bubble.
I don’t think a majority of American households go to college. So, no, this isn’t applicable to them at all. Let alone the half that do go and don’t get federal aid. And that’s probably an even greater share for the limited group of selective, expensive colleges listed here.
So, no, it’s not worth discussing, and especially not for a literal majority of American households.
Knowing that these are the type of people on the forum, who can't see outside of their bubble is disconcerting. More than 50% of Americans are going off to some college these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. OP stole this from
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/16tenex/revealed_employer_preferences_in_t50ish_colleges/
2. It's College Scorecard data.
The College Scorecard dataset only considers data from students receiving federal student aid.
Several groups are left out,
including undocumented and international students,
on top of those in more financially advantageous situations
It also doesn't consider cost of living in the area of employment.
Yeah this data is not really worth discussing.
Not really worth discussing? Other than the literal majority of American households who qualify under this umbrella.
“Literal” and “majority” do not mean what you seem to think they mean. A literal majority of American households do not fall under this umbrella.
You don’t think a majority of American households qualify for any financial aid?
Yeah, sure. Stay in the UMC bubble.
I don’t think a majority of American households go to college. So, no, this isn’t applicable to them at all. Let alone the half that do go and don’t get federal aid. And that’s probably an even greater share for the limited group of selective, expensive colleges listed here.
So, no, it’s not worth discussing, and especially not for a literal majority of American households.
Anonymous wrote:The formatting is killing my brain, so reordered.
First Tier
Harvey Mudd, MIT, CalTech, UPenn, Stanford, Harvard
Second Tier
Dartmouth, Duke, Johns Hopkins, Carnegie Mellon, Yale, Claremont McKenna, Georgetown, UChicago, Columbia, Northwestern, Vanderbilt, Rice, Cornell, Berkeley, NYU,
Third Tier
Wasington & Lee, Bowdoin, Georgia Tech, Northeastern, Notre Dame, BU, Pomona, Amherst, Villanova, USC, Emory, Williams, Swarthmore, Barnard, Colgate, Wake Forest, Middlebury, BU, UVA, Tufts, WashU at St. Louis, Wellesley
Fourth Tier
Trinity (TX), Bucknell, Wesleyan, Brandeis, Lehigh, Michigan, UT Austin, Colby, Brown, UCLA, Davidson, Rochester, Wisconsin, Haverford, Case Western, Bates, UNC, Bryn Mawr, Illinois, UC San Diego, Hamilton, Richmond, UMiami, Florida, William & Mary, Kenyon, Georgia, Vassar
Fifth Tier
Tulane, Macalester, Carleton, Grinnell, Smith, Colorado
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. OP stole this from
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/16tenex/revealed_employer_preferences_in_t50ish_colleges/
2. It's College Scorecard data.
The College Scorecard dataset only considers data from students receiving federal student aid.
Several groups are left out,
including undocumented and international students,
on top of those in more financially advantageous situations
It also doesn't consider cost of living in the area of employment.
Yeah this data is not really worth discussing.
Not really worth discussing? Other than the literal majority of American households who qualify under this umbrella.
“Literal” and “majority” do not mean what you seem to think they mean. A literal majority of American households do not fall under this umbrella.
You don’t think a majority of American households qualify for any financial aid?
Yeah, sure. Stay in the UMC bubble.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:1. OP stole this from
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/16tenex/revealed_employer_preferences_in_t50ish_colleges/
2. It's College Scorecard data.
The College Scorecard dataset only considers data from students receiving federal student aid.
Several groups are left out,
including undocumented and international students,
on top of those in more financially advantageous situations
It also doesn't consider cost of living in the area of employment.
Yeah this data is not really worth discussing.
Not really worth discussing? Other than the literal majority of American households who qualify under this umbrella.
“Literal” and “majority” do not mean what you seem to think they mean. A literal majority of American households do not fall under this umbrella.
Anonymous wrote:Someone explain Harvey Mudd to me. It's like they wanted to sound like "Harvard" but stretched it out more.
Anonymous wrote:Someone explain Harvey Mudd to me. It's like they wanted to sound like "Harvard" but stretched it out more.
Anonymous wrote:Brown grad with a humanities degree here. My starting salary wasn’t high (though was totally fine), but I had multiple offers and a job waiting for me at graduation. I now make $750k in an arts job that at least isn’t actively making the world worse that I didn’t have to go to grad school for. Starting salary isn’t everything.