BAFTA nominations are out: https://variety.com/2025/awards/awards/bafta-film-awards-nominations-2025-1236273459/

Demi continues her momentum, clinching another major award nom.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

She's been nominated 15 times previously, pretty sure they have nothing against her!

She has only won once.

So you’re saying she’s only won the Oscar, Golden Globe, BAFTA, Emmy, AFI Lifetime Achievement, SAG ONLY ONCE! How dreadful.

She’s a well-decorated actress. We get it. Kidman, Streep, Winslet, Moore, Zellweger, and a few others have won The Awards several times over. You could make the case they should all have more. But voters sometimes go with beloved actors and actresses who have not yet been recognized with one of The Awards, and honestly, it’s refreshing to see a Viola Davis or an Octavia Spencer or someone else be recognized. Would love to see Amy Adams win the Oscar one of these days.

She has only won the SAG once. You don't have to agree with my opinion. She gave the better preformance and has been constantly overlooked.

Have you seen all the other performances? Somehow I doubt it.

My ideal Best Actress list:
Jean-Baptiste
Torres
Moore
Madison
Kidman

In that order.

I think it will probably end up being Moore, Madison, Erivo, and Gascon, with Jean-Baptiste, Torres, or Kidman in the last slot. I really liked Gascon but the part was underwritten compared to the others. Erivo was great but I don't think the role was as strong either.

Nicole can still get it. I don't think the 4 SAG are locked. Fernanda *should* get in. Every globe winner in the past +30 years have gotten in. Expect Fernanda has had a late campaign and not many people have seen her movie. She was supposed to campaign now but the fires most certainly stopped cute her time down. She may not make it. That leaves two open spots. i think Eviro could be snubbed like Margot Robbie. Emilia P. was awful too so i don't think shes locked. I do think Kate, Nicole and Angelina were skipped over the SAG so other people can get a chance. They all have multiple awards and will have other roles

Locked
Demi
Micky

Eh
Fernando
Karla

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

She's been nominated 15 times previously, pretty sure they have nothing against her!

She has only won once.

So you’re saying she’s only won the Oscar, Golden Globe, BAFTA, Emmy, AFI Lifetime Achievement, SAG ONLY ONCE! How dreadful.

She’s a well-decorated actress. We get it. Kidman, Streep, Winslet, Moore, Zellweger, and a few others have won The Awards several times over. You could make the case they should all have more. But voters sometimes go with beloved actors and actresses who have not yet been recognized with one of The Awards, and honestly, it’s refreshing to see a Viola Davis or an Octavia Spencer or someone else be recognized. Would love to see Amy Adams win the Oscar one of these days.

She has only won the SAG once. You don't have to agree with my opinion. She gave the better preformance and has been constantly overlooked.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

She's been nominated 15 times previously, pretty sure they have nothing against her!

She has only won once.

So you’re saying she’s only won the Oscar, Golden Globe, BAFTA, Emmy, AFI Lifetime Achievement, SAG ONLY ONCE! How dreadful.

She’s a well-decorated actress. We get it. Kidman, Streep, Winslet, Moore, Zellweger, and a few others have won The Awards several times over. You could make the case they should all have more. But voters sometimes go with beloved actors and actresses who have not yet been recognized with one of The Awards, and honestly, it’s refreshing to see a Viola Davis or an Octavia Spencer or someone else be recognized. Would love to see Amy Adams win the Oscar one of these days.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

Looks like that's the theme this season but i am still sad for her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

She's been nominated 15 times previously, pretty sure they have nothing against her!

She has only won once.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

She's been nominated 15 times previously, pretty sure they have nothing against her!

Anonymous wrote:Wtf were those SAG nominations? What do they have against Nicole?

Maybe they’re just ready to give other people some flowers.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAG members and the Alphabet theory strikes again

How so?

For whatever reason lazy sag members tend to vote for people whose last names start in the beginning of the alphabet. So take the "surpises"

Pamela Anderson- Last show girl
Bailey- wicked
Jamie Curtis -last show girl
Monica Barbaro- complete unknown
Daniel Craig - queer

A,B,B,C,C i think it's because of how SAG sets up their ballot.

I don't buy this. They checked Anderson, yes, but then would have needed to consciously skip Jolie and Kidman to get to Madison and Moore.

Mickey and Madison would have been top 2 picks so they don't count.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAG members and the Alphabet theory strikes again

How so?

For whatever reason lazy sag members tend to vote for people whose last names start in the beginning of the alphabet. So take the "surpises"

Pamela Anderson- Last show girl
Bailey- wicked
Jamie Curtis -last show girl
Monica Barbaro- complete unknown
Daniel Craig - queer

A,B,B,C,C i think it's because of how SAG sets up their ballot.

I don't buy this. They checked Anderson, yes, but then would have needed to consciously skip Jolie and Kidman to get to Madison and Moore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SAG members and the Alphabet theory strikes again

How so?

For whatever reason lazy sag members tend to vote for people whose last names start in the beginning of the alphabet. So take the "surpises"

Pamela Anderson- Last show girl
Bailey- wicked
Jamie Curtis -last show girl
Monica Barbaro- complete unknown
Daniel Craig - queer

A,B,B,C,C i think it's because of how SAG sets up their ballot.

Anonymous wrote:SAG members and the Alphabet theory strikes again

How so?

SAG members and the Alphabet theory strikes again