Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are hearing rumors some big clubs aren’t attending this year and were also just told we could bring more swimmers than originally planned. Which clubs are definitely attending? Who dropped out?
There are not many big clubs at this meet. The big clubs (RMSC, NCAP, Machine, etc) all attend NCI and Turkey Claus.
NCI pulls in a lot of teams from out of state and many qualifying cuts are faster than senior champs. It certainly takes a faster time to final. It’s a really fast meet.
NCI is just an incredibly fast meet. Thankfully Turkey Claus, sport Fair winter classic, etc exist for the not incredibly fast.
To be clear, there are plenty of swimmers at the Winter Classic that are fast enough to swim at the NCI. Their teams just don't participate so they cannot, even though they have the cuts. NCI is unquestionably a much faster meet, but it's inaccurate to say that the Winter Classic is for swimmers that are "not incredibly fast".
100%! Just looking at one event (50 back) in 9-10 girls, York, Makos, and OCCS all have 9-10 girls who are as fast as girls on NCAP and RMSC. York has the two fastest 9-10 girls in all of PVS by miles. (We swim at NCAP, but huge props to York. If we lived closer, I might change to York. They look like they are a true team.)
By the way YORK has literally always has good 10&Unders so where are their girls ranked in 13-14 and 15&Over categories right now?
If they aren’t high then sorry they aren’t a good team (unless you only want success at 10)
A lot of them move to NCAP.
Anonymous wrote:The Mako Olympic Trial swimmer switch confused me: I get needing the cohort to train, but it does say something that she got there with them and that training cohort. Makos have some other rockstar younger kids, so they must be doing something right, its a shame to lose them after all that when they hit high school age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are hearing rumors some big clubs aren’t attending this year and were also just told we could bring more swimmers than originally planned. Which clubs are definitely attending? Who dropped out?
There are not many big clubs at this meet. The big clubs (RMSC, NCAP, Machine, etc) all attend NCI and Turkey Claus.
NCI pulls in a lot of teams from out of state and many qualifying cuts are faster than senior champs. It certainly takes a faster time to final. It’s a really fast meet.
NCI is just an incredibly fast meet. Thankfully Turkey Claus, sport Fair winter classic, etc exist for the not incredibly fast.
To be clear, there are plenty of swimmers at the Winter Classic that are fast enough to swim at the NCI. Their teams just don't participate so they cannot, even though they have the cuts. NCI is unquestionably a much faster meet, but it's inaccurate to say that the Winter Classic is for swimmers that are "not incredibly fast".
100%! Just looking at one event (50 back) in 9-10 girls, York, Makos, and OCCS all have 9-10 girls who are as fast as girls on NCAP and RMSC. York has the two fastest 9-10 girls in all of PVS by miles. (We swim at NCAP, but huge props to York. If we lived closer, I might change to York. They look like they are a true team.)
By the way YORK has literally always has good 10&Unders so where are their girls ranked in 13-14 and 15&Over categories right now?
If they aren’t high then sorry they aren’t a good team (unless you only want success at 10)
A lot of them move to NCAP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Mako Olympic Trial swimmer switch confused me: I get needing the cohort to train, but it does say something that she got there with them and that training cohort. Makos have some other rockstar younger kids, so they must be doing something right, it’s a shame to lose them after all that when they hit high school age.
I do not know that swimmer’s situation but I would imagine being a Trials qualifier at 14 she was swimming up in training, meaning her cohort was older, and perhaps she felt she had already maxed out what she could get with Makos by training up and wanted to train with kids her age that could push her.
Anonymous wrote:The Mako Olympic Trial swimmer switch confused me: I get needing the cohort to train, but it does say something that she got there with them and that training cohort. Makos have some other rockstar younger kids, so they must be doing something right, it’s a shame to lose them after all that when they hit high school age.
[i][/b]Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:[b]I think it’s pretty concerning that a grown-up is calling a talented swimmer “middle of the road” when they age up. I actually know this girl, and she’s not only an incredible athlete but also a team player with natural leadership abilities. Let’s not tarnish the confidence of young kids who are working so hard to excel. Instead, we should be encouraging and celebrating their successes, regardless of where they fall within an age group.
I just looked at the 9-10 girls 50 back and there is a York girl in 1st, NCAP 2nd, a York girl in 3rd who will be 11 in a month, and then a bunch of RMSC swimmers. I’m not seeing the domination you’re describing by York. The do have a great current 10 year old girl, but she is 1 month from being middle of the road as an 11-12. You would expect a 10 month 11 year old swimmer to be at the top of the 9-10 group.
lol I meant 10 years, 11 months.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are hearing rumors some big clubs aren’t attending this year and were also just told we could bring more swimmers than originally planned. Which clubs are definitely attending? Who dropped out?
There are not many big clubs at this meet. The big clubs (RMSC, NCAP, Machine, etc) all attend NCI and Turkey Claus.
NCI pulls in a lot of teams from out of state and many qualifying cuts are faster than senior champs. It certainly takes a faster time to final. It’s a really fast meet.
NCI is just an incredibly fast meet. Thankfully Turkey Claus, sport Fair winter classic, etc exist for the not incredibly fast.
To be clear, there are plenty of swimmers at the Winter Classic that are fast enough to swim at the NCI. Their teams just don't participate so they cannot, even though they have the cuts. NCI is unquestionably a much faster meet, but it's inaccurate to say that the Winter Classic is for swimmers that are "not incredibly fast".
100%! Just looking at one event (50 back) in 9-10 girls, York, Makos, and OCCS all have 9-10 girls who are as fast as girls on NCAP and RMSC. York has the two fastest 9-10 girls in all of PVS by miles. (We swim at NCAP, but huge props to York. If we lived closer, I might change to York. They look like they are a true team.)
By the way YORK has literally always has good 10&Unders so where are their girls ranked in 13-14 and 15&Over categories right now?
If they aren’t high then sorry they aren’t a good team (unless you only want success at 10)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are hearing rumors some big clubs aren’t attending this year and were also just told we could bring more swimmers than originally planned. Which clubs are definitely attending? Who dropped out?
There are not many big clubs at this meet. The big clubs (RMSC, NCAP, Machine, etc) all attend NCI and Turkey Claus.
NCI pulls in a lot of teams from out of state and many qualifying cuts are faster than senior champs. It certainly takes a faster time to final. It’s a really fast meet.
NCI is just an incredibly fast meet. Thankfully Turkey Claus, sport Fair winter classic, etc exist for the not incredibly fast.
To be clear, there are plenty of swimmers at the Winter Classic that are fast enough to swim at the NCI. Their teams just don't participate so they cannot, even though they have the cuts. NCI is unquestionably a much faster meet, but it's inaccurate to say that the Winter Classic is for swimmers that are "not incredibly fast".
100%! Just looking at one event (50 back) in 9-10 girls, York, Makos, and OCCS all have 9-10 girls who are as fast as girls on NCAP and RMSC. York has the two fastest 9-10 girls in all of PVS by miles. (We swim at NCAP, but huge props to York. If we lived closer, I might change to York. They look like they are a true team.)
By the way YORK has literally always has good 10&Unders so where are their girls ranked in 13-14 and 15&Over categories right now?
If they aren’t high then sorry they aren’t a good team (unless you only want success at 10)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are hearing rumors some big clubs aren’t attending this year and were also just told we could bring more swimmers than originally planned. Which clubs are definitely attending? Who dropped out?
There are not many big clubs at this meet. The big clubs (RMSC, NCAP, Machine, etc) all attend NCI and Turkey Claus.
NCI pulls in a lot of teams from out of state and many qualifying cuts are faster than senior champs. It certainly takes a faster time to final. It’s a really fast meet.
NCI is just an incredibly fast meet. Thankfully Turkey Claus, sport Fair winter classic, etc exist for the not incredibly fast.
To be clear, there are plenty of swimmers at the Winter Classic that are fast enough to swim at the NCI. Their teams just don't participate so they cannot, even though they have the cuts. NCI is unquestionably a much faster meet, but it's inaccurate to say that the Winter Classic is for swimmers that are "not incredibly fast".
100%! Just looking at one event (50 back) in 9-10 girls, York, Makos, and OCCS all have 9-10 girls who are as fast as girls on NCAP and RMSC. York has the two fastest 9-10 girls in all of PVS by miles. (We swim at NCAP, but huge props to York. If we lived closer, I might change to York. They look like they are a true team.)
Anonymous wrote:[b]I think it’s pretty concerning that a grown-up is calling a talented swimmer “middle of the road” when they age up. I actually know this girl, and she’s not only an incredible athlete but also a team player with natural leadership abilities. Let’s not tarnish the confidence of young kids who are working so hard to excel. Instead, we should be encouraging and celebrating their successes, regardless of where they fall within an age group.
I just looked at the 9-10 girls 50 back and there is a York girl in 1st, NCAP 2nd, a York girl in 3rd who will be 11 in a month, and then a bunch of RMSC swimmers. I’m not seeing the domination you’re describing by York. The do have a great current 10 year old girl, but she is 1 month from being middle of the road as an 11-12. You would expect a 10 month 11 year old swimmer to be at the top of the 9-10 group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The team list is in the back of the shirt. The only one I notice missing from last year is the St James. At least one new team.
https://form.jotform.com/243247225046149
It looks like the same big teams and some of the small teams have been switched with some other teams. This is a really small meet with clubs limited to 80 entrants total (Marlins 120 entrants as host).
NCI had 8,727 entries last year, Winter Classic had 7,806. One random PVS Nov open (the only one I checked) had 4,193 entries. Maybe the bar for “really small” is less than 8,000 entries, not my area of expertise.
There’s a difference between entrants (the total number of swimmers who are entered in the meet) and the number of entries (the total number of swimmers entered in each event, so each swimmer could conceivably count 7x since they are allowed to enter 7 events).
5,156 for NCI, 4,007 for Winter Classic, 1,618 for November open. So maybe the bar is 5,000 entrants.
I don’t know what kind of special math you are doing but there were not 4,000 individual swimmers at Winter Classic last year, there was just short of 900.
Maybe you’ve never looked at the timeline distributed before every single meet. Each session has a “swimmer count for warmups” and “total entries”. NCI and winter classic have 17 sessions.
Oh sweetie, looking at the count for warms ups or entries for each session and then adding them all together isn’t going to give you the correct number of swimmers because most swimmers are swimming in multiple sessions so you are counting them multiple times. Just go to swimcloud or swim standards for the actual number of swimmers participating in the meet. There absolutely were not 4000 swimmers at Winter Classic last year.
Nobody said there were 4,000 swimmers at winter classic. There were’t 5,000 at NCI; you’d have to host at Byrd stadium. 4,000 was a comparison to the ~5,000 of NCI, to add perspective to the comment that winter classic is a really small meet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The team list is in the back of the shirt. The only one I notice missing from last year is the St James. At least one new team.
https://form.jotform.com/243247225046149
It looks like the same big teams and some of the small teams have been switched with some other teams. This is a really small meet with clubs limited to 80 entrants total (Marlins 120 entrants as host).
NCI had 8,727 entries last year, Winter Classic had 7,806. One random PVS Nov open (the only one I checked) had 4,193 entries. Maybe the bar for “really small” is less than 8,000 entries, not my area of expertise.
There’s a difference between entrants (the total number of swimmers who are entered in the meet) and the number of entries (the total number of swimmers entered in each event, so each swimmer could conceivably count 7x since they are allowed to enter 7 events).
5,156 for NCI, 4,007 for Winter Classic, 1,618 for November open. So maybe the bar is 5,000 entrants.
I don’t know what kind of special math you are doing but there were not 4,000 individual swimmers at Winter Classic last year, there was just short of 900.
Maybe you’ve never looked at the timeline distributed before every single meet. Each session has a “swimmer count for warmups” and “total entries”. NCI and winter classic have 17 sessions.
Oh sweetie, looking at the count for warms ups or entries for each session and then adding them all together isn’t going to give you the correct number of swimmers because most swimmers are swimming in multiple sessions so you are counting them multiple times. Just go to swimcloud or swim standards for the actual number of swimmers participating in the meet. There absolutely were not 4000 swimmers at Winter Classic last year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are hearing rumors some big clubs aren’t attending this year and were also just told we could bring more swimmers than originally planned. Which clubs are definitely attending? Who dropped out?
There are not many big clubs at this meet. The big clubs (RMSC, NCAP, Machine, etc) all attend NCI and Turkey Claus.
NCI pulls in a lot of teams from out of state and many qualifying cuts are faster than senior champs. It certainly takes a faster time to final. It’s a really fast meet.
NCI is just an incredibly fast meet. Thankfully Turkey Claus, sport Fair winter classic, etc exist for the not incredibly fast.
To be clear, there are plenty of swimmers at the Winter Classic that are fast enough to swim at the NCI. Their teams just don't participate so they cannot, even though they have the cuts. NCI is unquestionably a much faster meet, but it's inaccurate to say that the Winter Classic is for swimmers that are "not incredibly fast".
100%! Just looking at one event (50 back) in 9-10 girls, York, Makos, and OCCS all have 9-10 girls who are as fast as girls on NCAP and RMSC. York has the two fastest 9-10 girls in all of PVS by miles. (We swim at NCAP, but huge props to York. If we lived closer, I might change to York. They look like they are a true team.)
I just looked at the 9-10 girls 50 back and there is a York girl in 1st, NCAP 2nd, a York girl in 3rd who will be 11 in a month, and then a bunch of RMSC swimmers. I’m not seeing the domination you’re describing by York. The do have a great current 10 year old girl, but she is 1 month from being middle of the road as an 11-12. You would expect a 10 month 11 year old swimmer to be at the top of the 9-10 group.
I think the three York swimmers (9-10 girls) would win have a chance to win all NCI events, so I was agreeing that other teams have swimmers who easily could compete, and even win, events at NCI.
If you look at the 9-10 girls rankings there is a pretty even mix of York, RMSC and NCAP swimmers across the various events in PVS. Once you focus on events longer than a 50 the NCAP and RMSC swimmers take over.