Anonymous
11/27/2024 08:05
Subject: What’s the process for removing FCPS board members?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bottom line is they gave Reid an extension in the midst of this football fiasco, they have shown their judgement to be suspect and deserve whatever they get.
7 of them supported fraud... in writing.
Could they be recalled successfully over the letter that Frisch drafted and organized.
The previous recall drive was over incompetence and dereliction of duty. It failed after getting assigned to a very partisan judge.
In this case, over half of the FCPS school board openly supported fraud by so publicly throwing their support behind Hayfield. There is no way that the school board and Reid did not know about the homeless texts before writing the email and renewing Reid's contract. The smart reps (Dunne, Ricardy Anderson. Moon, McElvan) refused to sign on. That must have been for a reason. I would love to see Asra and the Fairfax Times FOIA the school board communications on this scandal.
Are there any #openfcps parents on here who would be willing to chime in?
Could the open homeless fraud supported by 2/3 of the school board be the thing that gets them successfully recalled?
+1 to all of the above, particularly the bolded.
Anonymous
11/27/2024 07:30
Subject: What’s the process for removing FCPS board members?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We can start getting the signatures at football games, then go to all the retired people in our neighborhoods and read passages from 1 of the 5 book Frisch swore on.
You know, you just lost me here. I am totally ready to join up with you in the good fight and you have to make this remark (let's trigger people's homophobia to get signatures!). This is why we can't be on the same team. Ever.
I’d like to clarify something. I don’t have an issue with the books being in the library. And I have only seen an excerpt from 1 of the books. It bothers me that Frisch swore on the books. I’m an atheist so it’s not that he didn’t swear on the Bible. But it was definitely a controversial and unnecessary thing to do.
Ok. I appreciate your point and I agree with you. Swearing on the banned books is gimmicky and provocative. Not appealing to me either. But your post goes in a different direction of assuming and appealing to people's homophobia in order to unite to shake up the school board. This is the Trump playbook and the very same one used by candidates in the last schoolboard election. It is so alienating to me and probably so many of us. When the GOP candidate in my area proudly displays his endorsement from a group whose entire motivation is to remove gay-themed books from the library, he loses me.