Anonymous wrote:Not really, unless he's over 40 and dating women who don't want more (or any) kids. Most women date because they eventually want to get married and have kids.

What will happen is that it just won't be worth it for women to have sex with men until the men commit to a long term relationship which may produce children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had a vasectomy a few years ago. Several women have asked whether I had one. Some have been more enthusiastic when they heard I had one but one basically ended a potential relationship immediately.

And this is what will happen. You will probably find more women who want a short term (or long term) sex only relationship, but not anyone who wants to have kids.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I got a vasectomy decades ago. For several years I could still see the tiny scars, but now they are faded away. Other than that, I have no proof. I didn't save any paperwork and didn't care, I was married then.

That said, I've never had a woman not believe me and all of them have been very grateful for it.

You can buy a test online for $50 and mail in your sample. The lab will analyze it and send you the results you can download from their website that shows no presence of sperm. It's very easy.

Anonymous wrote:I have one and when I date younger women, they really like it. I'm often the first person to ever "finish" in them since they've always responsibly used condoms to prevent STIs (we exchange clean test results first).

Anonymous wrote:Men lie.
And women know this.
So I predict no change.
The better course would be a return to greater discernment in choosing a partner and women consciously lowering their body count anyway. I don’t think society would be worse off for that outcome.

Do you understand what a vasectomy is? Specifically, that getting one has no impact on testosterone production or virility (based on, you know, science: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/vasec...n%20you%20ejaculate.)

Getting one is a great idea, especially for any man who would date you.

He is spiritually, mentally neutered, soft and doughy. Especially the guy who gets forced into the snip by his wife. No scientific study will show this, but you can use your own two eyes!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A vasectomy is reversible. You'd need up-to-date sperm count testing, plus a full panel for STIs.

Men can't be trusted. Verify. Always. And then still use condoms, because men.

A vasectomy is considered non-reversible. You have to sign a paper saying you understand that before you get one. The micro-vascular surgery required to reverse it is complicated but, even if they successfully re-attach the vas, a man can still be infertile. When a man has a vasectomy, the billions of sperm are absorbed by his body and sometimes, the immune system will attack them. This can also happen to a man who hasn't had a vasectomy and be a cause of infertility. So even if the the attachment goes well, he may still be infertile. No one should ever count on a vasectomy being reversible. I wish it was that simple. If only they could install a simple valve in teenage boys that would not be opened until he is ready to have children, then closed again.

Anonymous wrote:

Ewww. A man without intact vas deferens ends up looking like a eunuch. Doughy, soft, inoffensive, non-virile. Not cute!

Do you understand what a vasectomy is? Specifically, that getting one has no impact on testosterone production or virility (based on, you know, science: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/vasectomy/conditioninfo/sex-life#:~:text=It%20does%20not%20decrease%20your,amount%20of%20semen%20you%20ejaculate.)

Getting one is a great idea, especially for any man who would date you.

Ewww. A man without intact vas deferens ends up looking like a eunuch. Doughy, soft, inoffensive, non-virile. Not cute!