Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

What if Loving v Virginia is deemed a state issue and not a federal issue stemming from the long line of cases of right to privacy like Roe was decided. What if Griswald is also deemed a states right issue. Roe followed Griswald. Are you saying that anyone in an interracial marriage should only live in states north of the mason dixon line or coastal western states. Can a woman Carey her birth control in vacation across state lines when visiting granny in “The Villages “, without having fear of being arrested for having illegal contraband. Want to know how far you think these state rights go and how to keep a list of which states are safe for certain people to visit and or live.

Congress already passed a law requiring states to recognize gay marriage and interracial marriages from other states. That is not going anywhere even if these precedents are hypothetically overturned. SCOTUS will not touch Loving V. Virginia.

I know about Congress recognizing gay marriage. I am unfamiliar about the interracial marriage. When did the latter occur. TIA

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

They will never be able to even get the hearings done in time.

Just hope that Sotomayor can hold on for another 4 years.

Expect Thomas to retire and become a board member of dozens of corporations.

I agree. Sotomayor can and I pray will hold on. Thomas will retire in early 2025 and then can be even more open in getting money thrown at home. Trump will very quickly get someone in their 40s on. Alito does the same and the same happens in early 2026 at the latest, obv before midterms. The only wildcard is Roberts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

Pretty sure Republicans moto is "Rules For Thee but Not for Me".

You know his wife is white, right? You think he's looking for an annulment?

I don’t think Loving will happen. But Plyler
(guaranteeing education for recently emigrated children) is going to go before 2028.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

No, that would be so unpopular they’d never do that

They will however go after gay marriage and will probably allow more “conscience objection laws based on firmly held beliefs” type of stuff. You know more or allowing doctors to not treat trans people based on organized religion.

They'll never go after gay marriage. It's making too many gay people miserable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

Pretty sure Republicans moto is "Rules For Thee but Not for Me".

You know his wife is white, right? You think he's looking for an annulment?

Anonymous wrote:I think Pyler V. Doe will be overturned. it’s likely that SCOTUS will decide children without legal status in the US are not entitled to a public education.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

Pretty sure Republicans moto is "Rules For Thee but Not for Me".

You know his wife is white, right? You think he's looking for an annulment?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

What if Loving v Virginia is deemed a state issue and not a federal issue stemming from the long line of cases of right to privacy like Roe was decided. What if Griswald is also deemed a states right issue. Roe followed Griswald. Are you saying that anyone in an interracial marriage should only live in states north of the mason dixon line or coastal western states. Can a woman Carey her birth control in vacation across state lines when visiting granny in “The Villages “, without having fear of being arrested for having illegal contraband. Want to know how far you think these state rights go and how to keep a list of which states are safe for certain people to visit and or live.

Congress already passed a law requiring states to recognize gay marriage and interracial marriages from other states. That is not going anywhere even if these precedents are hypothetically overturned. SCOTUS will not touch Loving V. Virginia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

No, that would be so unpopular they’d never do that

They will however go after gay marriage and will probably allow more “conscience objection laws based on firmly held beliefs” type of stuff. You know more or allowing doctors to not treat trans people based on organized religion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sotomayor must resign immediately, so that Biden can replace her before Trump gets into office.

They will never be able to even get the hearings done in time.

Just hope that Sotomayor can hold on for another 4 years.

Expect Thomas to retire and become a board member of dozens of corporations.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

Don’t be naive

You think Clarence Thomas will overturn Loving? I mean I hate the guy and think he's terrible but I don't think he'll do that.

Pretty sure Republicans moto is "Rules For Thee but Not for Me".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Loving? Brown vs board? Griswold? Will these get overturned? If so what will happen? Does anybody care?

Don’t be silly.

This is what they said about Roe too.

Roe is easy to understand if you have any sense. They did not "outlaw abortion" as people here like to say. They ruled it’s a State issue not a Federal issue, because it is. Don’t like what your State has to say about it, change it at that level. As frustrating as it is, legally it’s the correct ruling.

Look dude. The point being there are 6 extremely religious people on the SC. They chose to destroy the concept of stare decisis when it was convenient to further their ideology. “Settled case law” is no more and now the door is open to do it to other things, like Gay marriage.