Anonymous wrote:Why are women so difficult and non cooperative within their own circles and among other women?

It’s rare to find good, healthy, female relationships.

Heck, many women lied to other women about who they were voting for

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

In this case, it was. Tells you something about the female candidate, right?

No, it doesn't. It just says that you'd rather vote for a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon than a woman (and God forbid a black woman). But let me guess, you're an old white dude.

I’m not this poster but am a woman who voted for Hillary and did not vote for Kamala. But, sure, blame it on misogyny instead of looking at the candidate and the policy positions she’s taken over the years.

I really want just one of you to tell me in a way that makes sense how Kamala was less qualified than Trump, or Nikki.

Kamala has the intellect and communication skills of a fence post.
You are welcome even if you cannot comprehend.

Hmmmm not sure if you watched the same debate with Trump that I did, but she owned his ass.

So no, I cannot comprehend because it's just another "I hate Kalmala but I can't explain why."

You hate her because she is a black woman. just own it.

NP. She was rehearsed, rehearsed, rehearsed for the debate. That's not good communication skills; that's just acting. People who are really smart and good communicators can carry conversation without teleprompters and endless practice. Like JD Vance.

BAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA

And she baited trump over and over and over again. He took the bait every single time. She worked him like a fiddle. And you think she is dumb. God help us all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You need to dispense of the notion that men and women are equally equipped and inclined to handled the same things. Much of what is deemed "misogyny" is simply just taking this reality as a first principle rather than seeking absolute "equality" in everything, which is folly. Equality is a mirage.

And here is why she lost. RIGHT HERE!!!! Blatant, unapologetic misogyny on display.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

In this case, it was. Tells you something about the female candidate, right?

No, it doesn't. It just says that you'd rather vote for a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon than a woman (and God forbid a black woman). But let me guess, you're an old white dude.

I’m not this poster but am a woman who voted for Hillary and did not vote for Kamala. But, sure, blame it on misogyny instead of looking at the candidate and the policy positions she’s taken over the years.

I really want just one of you to tell me in a way that makes sense how Kamala was less qualified than Trump, or Nikki.

Kamala has the intellect and communication skills of a fence post.
You are welcome even if you cannot comprehend.

Hmmmm not sure if you watched the same debate with Trump that I did, but she owned his ass.

So no, I cannot comprehend because it's just another "I hate Kalmala but I can't explain why."

You hate her because she is a black woman. just own it.

NP. She was rehearsed, rehearsed, rehearsed for the debate. That's not good communication skills; that's just acting. People who are really smart and good communicators can carry conversation without teleprompters and endless practice. Like JD Vance.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women should support other women, but for who they are and what they stand for, NOT just because they are women. If I don't agree with you, you will not get supported by me. Let's hold women to a higher standard than just "we're the same gender."

This. She was a horrible candidate. The majority of the population agreed. She lost. Let’s spend the next four years finding better, more competent women candidates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

In this case, it was. Tells you something about the female candidate, right?

No, it doesn't. It just says that you'd rather vote for a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon than a woman (and God forbid a black woman). But let me guess, you're an old white dude.

I’m not this poster but am a woman who voted for Hillary and did not vote for Kamala. But, sure, blame it on misogyny instead of looking at the candidate and the policy positions she’s taken over the years.

I really want just one of you to tell me in a way that makes sense how Kamala was less qualified than Trump, or Nikki.

Kamala has the intellect and communication skills of a fence post.
You are welcome even if you cannot comprehend.

Hmmmm not sure if you watched the same debate with Trump that I did, but she owned his ass.

So no, I cannot comprehend because it's just another "I hate Kalmala but I can't explain why."

You hate her because she is a black woman. just own it.

Anonymous wrote:You need to dispense of the notion that men and women are equally equipped and inclined to handled the same things. Much of what is deemed "misogyny" is simply just taking this reality as a first principle rather than seeking absolute "equality" in everything, which is folly. Equality is a mirage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Put up a better female candidate next time and stop blaming it on this.

In what world is a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon a better candidate?

In this case, it was. Tells you something about the female candidate, right?

No, it doesn't. It just says that you'd rather vote for a grifter, rapist, insurrectionist, and convicted felon than a woman (and God forbid a black woman). But let me guess, you're an old white dude.

I’m not this poster but am a woman who voted for Hillary and did not vote for Kamala. But, sure, blame it on misogyny instead of looking at the candidate and the policy positions she’s taken over the years.

I really want just one of you to tell me in a way that makes sense how Kamala was less qualified than Trump, or Nikki.

Kamala has the intellect and communication skills of a fence post.
You are welcome even if you cannot comprehend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One very easy step would be to stop shaming stay at home moms in your community and online. They are women, they are contributors and right now they are given more respect by scum like Vance than Dems, who are afraid to be. acknowledge them for fear of feminist wrath.

Ever heard of the patriarchy? Vance doesn’t respect stay at home moms, he just believes that is what a woman should be. That a woman doesn’t have value behind being a mother. Hence, the childless cat ladies comment. And I’d love you to do a deep dive into Trump’s comments about protecting women…even if they don’t want it. Save it with your “feminist wrath BS.” Women aren’t going to shut up and stay at home just because men don’t like it.

He’s going to be president for four more years and then he’ll be gone. I’m not wasting time on your stupid research.

What does this even mean? Research? Classic response from someone who doesn’t know how to support their opinions. Call it stupid.

Sorry. I’m not going on a deep dive regarding Trump. What’s the point now? IT’S OVER. O-V-E-R.