Anonymous wrote:People, stop reading things out of context and in snippets. If you read something and it inflames you, assume you aren't getting the full story.
Anonymous wrote:She can't win. Black men got mad b/c she didn't talk about an agenda for black men and white people got mad b/c she talked about an agenda for black men.
Which do you want? She's stuck.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This agenda is racist.
The American political agenda has been racist, favoring the white men. Nothing wrong giving a disadvantaged group a chance.
-- Asian
We are trying to do better now. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am not White, Asian as well.
Metirocracy all the way.
There is no such thing as Meritocracy in America. I know you love that talking point, but America doesn't work that way.
Which is bad, right? We should work towards making it that way rather than doubling down on race sorting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This agenda is racist.
The American political agenda has been racist, favoring the white men. Nothing wrong giving a disadvantaged group a chance.
-- Asian
We are trying to do better now. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am not White, Asian as well.
Metirocracy all the way.
There is no such thing as Meritocracy in America. I know you love that talking point, but America doesn't work that way.
Which is bad, right? We should work towards making it that way rather than doubling down on race sorting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This agenda is racist.
The American political agenda has been racist, favoring the white men. Nothing wrong giving a disadvantaged group a chance.
-- Asian
We are trying to do better now. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am not White, Asian as well.
Metirocracy all the way.
There is no such thing as Meritocracy in America. I know you love that talking point, but America doesn't work that way.
Which is bad, right? We should work towards making it that way rather than doubling down on race sorting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This agenda is racist.
The American political agenda has been racist, favoring the white men. Nothing wrong giving a disadvantaged group a chance.
-- Asian
We are trying to do better now. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am not White, Asian as well.
Metirocracy all the way.
There is no such thing as Meritocracy in America. I know you love that talking point, but America doesn't work that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I disagree with people calling these measures racist.
Many of the proposals will help many people including black men (if enacted in good ways) - by improving education and mental health services.
I don’t use drugs and don’t love the smell of pot but there is evidence that legalizing pot helps reduce incarceration rates for blacks and whites. I can put up with the smell if it helps people to stay on better paths.
“The data supports that medicinal and recreational marijuana legalization decreases prison rates for Whites and Blacks, but not for Hispanics. Since the prison rate data was collected for all crimes, there could be another crime that increased Hispanic prison rates.”
https://www.uakron.edu/economics/academics/senior-projects/2023/franchescisseniorprojectspring2023.pdf
Pew research shows that Clear majorities of Black Americans favor marijuana legalization, easing of criminal penalties. So if it helps their communities to have more families with parents not in jail for non violent offenses, then I can see the value.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/06/08/clear-majorities-of-black-americans-favor-marijuana-legalization-easing-of-criminal-penalties/
Why should a black person get a loan that a similar white person cannot? How is that not racist? Why not target all low income people and then let all poor people get help rather than just a certain skin color?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This agenda is racist.
The American political agenda has been racist, favoring the white men. Nothing wrong giving a disadvantaged group a chance.
-- Asian
We are trying to do better now. Two wrongs do not make a right. I am not White, Asian as well.
Metirocracy all the way.
Anonymous wrote:How is #1 even legal?