Anonymous wrote:I love it. She's usually so stoic and without feeling. I love her baddie era!
She's really funny and honest.
Anonymous wrote:So she married rich and has been grifting ever since off the idle rich New England / Hamptons housewife aesthetic. See also that food network flyover state hick / failed actress who married the oil heir and sells proles a ranch family aesthetic. Literally same blueprint.
Anonymous wrote:She is boss man. She built her empire, went to jail and lost like a billion and her reputation then reinvented herself to become popular and successful again.
I would seriously like to see you all haters do that, male or female.
She didn't feel sorry for herself, she's true to herself and knows what floats her boat and not, she's got some street in her no matter how much she was born with cause I'm telling you, no way someone like snoop is gonna be into her otherwise. She is a self made woman who has her faults but ultimately, she is true to herself.
In my book, she's cool. Honesty is a better look than stupidity and wish washy no matter how much you may like someone's shtick. She makes mistakes for sure and she isn't perfect but she's real. Love her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Martha’s story reinforces how dangerous it can be to be a woman even if you are attractive and rich. She is a true feminist and her story shows there is still no equality for women.
Voice of sanity
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She always promoted herself as a "teacher" but as someone who has had many teachers, I always found her to be too rigid and sort of boring. The best teachers help you find your own way...she was didactic and basically just talks at the reader or viewer. Like a task master...like her father.
As a big Martha fan, I think that was partly the brand they built. It’s really interesting to see the contrast between the old brand, and even the recent blog, and her MarthaStewart48 insta account which (at least used to be) pretty unfiltered. Her caption writing was so different (dare I say sloppy) than the blog or the old show scripts. On her daytime show you got peeks of it here and there.
Also a longtime fan and yes definitely. She shows less precision in a variety of ways in her thinking... and honestly I have wondered if it is simply an aspect of her aging. She may look great but her mind is almost 85 years old and to me it shows but that's only because I watched her a lot in her 50's. Or maybe it's her thc use who knows? Definitely looser, for better or worse. And boredering on inapprpriate sometimes the way some older people can.. I wonder what her daughter makes of it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She always promoted herself as a "teacher" but as someone who has had many teachers, I always found her to be too rigid and sort of boring. The best teachers help you find your own way...she was didactic and basically just talks at the reader or viewer. Like a task master...like her father.
As a big Martha fan, I think that was partly the brand they built. It’s really interesting to see the contrast between the old brand, and even the recent blog, and her MarthaStewart48 insta account which (at least used to be) pretty unfiltered. Her caption writing was so different (dare I say sloppy) than the blog or the old show scripts. On her daytime show you got peeks of it here and there.
Anonymous wrote:Martha’s story reinforces how dangerous it can be to be a woman even if you are attractive and rich. She is a true feminist and her story shows there is still no equality for women.
Anonymous wrote:I remain impressed by what she accomplished despite her obvious flaws.
My favorite parts of the documentary:
Learning that she painted an entire house by herself—impressive!
[/b]Watching her berate the person for cutting the orange with the wrong knife ;0)[b]
I think the fact that she is a legit friend of Snoop speaks volumes; she must be an interesting and cool person IRL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Half way through and I'm loving the new Martha documentary. Most surprising so far: her childhood thru stock broker years.
Her dad was physically (belts + stick whippings) and verbally abusive, and her mother was not motherly at all. With six kids at home, the dad loses his sales job and the family had to grown their own food and barter with neighbors for other basic needs.
Martha somehow earned a scholarship to Barnard and also sent most of her modeling paychecks home to help support her younger siblings. Someone above mentioned that Martha had the "privilege" to pursue her passions. I would argue that she forged her own path that enabled her to do that. She was already a very successful woman when she was introduced to her first husband by a fellow Barnard classmate (the guy's sister). He was in law school at the time but didn't even go into law.
Until now, my opinion of Martha Stewart has oscillated between IDGAF to pure dislike. Now, I kinda dig the woman. No wonder Snoop is a big fan.
She is self made for sure. The reference to privilege was that she did marry rich (she mentions her honeymoon was 5 months!!) and could buy a multi-acre estate fairly young, start her own catering business and have enough connections to grow it. Clearly she was extremely savvy and did way more than is possible for most people. But I do think she had privilege from her marriage, her modeling and her stockbroker job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She's a very interesting woman: blunt, funny, smart accomplished, talented, doesn't seem kind or empathetic. Does the special address the jail thing? It never made sense to me she'd be convicted.
Different standards for women.
Do you realize how many members of Congress have done something similar? Not only are they not in jail, but they get to make the laws under which others are prosecuted.
https://campaignlegal.org/update/stock-act-failed-effort-stop-insider-trading-congress