Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

Sure, how awful it would be for a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher to be on the board of education.

Not only that, the BOE has 9 members, right? No one member can get much done unless 4 others sign on.

That's more of an argument in favor of Diaz.

No, it's not. Here's the rule: don't vote for a crank.

Well that knocks out all 6 candidates.

No, it doesn't. You might not like the other 5 candidates, but they're not cranks. Brenda Diaz is a crank. Specifically, a crank supported by "Moms For Liberty".

I don't know how to explain this to you if you don't get it already, but if the church of Satan came out and said they support you, they doesn't make YOU a Satanist.
Moms for liberty is able to exist because most of their platform is academics over equity.. yes they then go over the line but we are all now looking for a more moderate candidate. History predicts that when societies don't move back to center, they end up on the extreme. We are much too far on the left now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Went to early voting and chose Diaz, and in the other BOE races, voted against the incumbents. MCPS at this point can only go up.

THANK YOU!!! 🙏

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

Sure, how awful it would be for a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher to be on the board of education.

Not only that, the BOE has 9 members, right? No one member can get much done unless 4 others sign on.

That's more of an argument in favor of Diaz.

No, it's not. Here's the rule: don't vote for a crank.

Well that knocks out all 6 candidates.

No, it doesn't. You might not like the other 5 candidates, but they're not cranks. Brenda Diaz is a crank. Specifically, a crank supported by "Moms For Liberty".

Anonymous wrote:Went to early voting and chose Diaz, and in the other BOE races, voted against the incumbents. MCPS at this point can only go up.

Anonymous wrote:You can read what Diaz said to the school board in the link below. Although I don't know if she was endorsed by Moms4Liberty, her values are inline with theirs.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/C7HGGG43BCDC/%24file/Brenda%2520Diaz%2520Written%2520Testimony.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjQtefCxLKJAxVIMlkFHeDeF6oQ6sMDegQIIxAB&usg=AOvVaw1_2lyTMyHzRnaA9q__Ve7Q

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the unsubstantiated slurs against Diaz make me want to vote for her. The opposition is deeply suspect.

The case against Diaz has been documented.

Did you read the article? All documented and facts. She is a liability and someone who couldn’t follow simple rules her employer gave her. That alone makes her an awful candidate.

Anonymous wrote:You can read what Diaz said to the school board in the link below. Although I don't know if she was endorsed by Moms4Liberty, her values are inline with theirs.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/C7HGGG43BCDC/%24file/Brenda%2520Diaz%2520Written%2520Testimony.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjQtefCxLKJAxVIMlkFHeDeF6oQ6sMDegQIIxAB&usg=AOvVaw1_2lyTMyHzRnaA9q__Ve7Q

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

Sure, how awful it would be for a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher to be on the board of education.

Not only that, the BOE has 9 members, right? No one member can get much done unless 4 others sign on.

That's more of an argument in favor of Diaz.

No, it's not. Here's the rule: don't vote for a crank.

Well that knocks out all 6 candidates.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the unsubstantiated slurs against Diaz make me want to vote for her. The opposition is deeply suspect.

The case against Diaz has been documented.

Anonymous wrote:All the unsubstantiated slurs against Diaz make me want to vote for her. The opposition is deeply suspect.

Anonymous wrote:All the unsubstantiated slurs against Diaz make me want to vote for her. The opposition is deeply suspect.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s wrong with Zimmerman?

At best, Zimmerman is using the BoE position as a stepping stone to a career in politics. At worst, she's a workaround to giving the union a spot on the board. She doesn't have any kids the system, she won't feel the impact that of any BoE decisions would have on kids.

Both Zimmerman and Diaz are absolutely terrible candidates that don't belong anywhere near the board.

Zimmerman seems wonderful to me.

She may be a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher, but she's a terrible candidate for the board.

Sure, how awful it would be for a wonderful person and a wonderful teacher to be on the board of education.

Not only that, the BOE has 9 members, right? No one member can get much done unless 4 others sign on.

That's more of an argument in favor of Diaz.

No, it's not. Here's the rule: don't vote for a crank.