Anonymous wrote:Scratching my head. Is the school handing out A’s? Because all the other measures indicate this kid is NOT cut out for engineering.
Anonymous wrote:If he gets into an Engineering school, it would be MUCH better to be in a smaller E school with a supportive environment and a very high graduation rate. Also, be prepared for him to go onto a 5-year undergrad track.
With those scores, DC is really not a strong E School applicant. Test Scores really DO correlate strongly with success/failure in any E School.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Longwood
Towsend
VMI
CMU
I don't believe Longwood and Towson have engineering.
CMU= Carnegie Mellon? Incredibly competitive, even though it's "test optional."
VMI only if he has a sincere interest in becoming a military officer.
CMU may be Central Michigan University. That is more likely.
One of the robotics team members at our school chose a full ride at Central Mich for engineering vs. paying to go to U of M. If he wants to work in Michigan, it will work out fine.
For OP's kid, I would definitely recommend a school that has excellent supports for remediation and retention vs. a focus on weeding out freshman engineers. Many people get weeded out of engineering as freshmen. It's a miserable process. And sometimes a big waste of talent. Kids do the best they can in their local environment only to find it's not even enough to stay afloat at a tough school.
Somebody above mentioned FAMU engineers. I had a couple classmates from that program in my MBA program. I was impressed by them. I would second taking a look at that.
A friend of mine who wanted small classes and personalized attention for her engineering major kid sent him to Marquette. It's going well so far.
Anonymous wrote:If he gets into an Engineering school, it would be MUCH better to be in a smaller E school with a supportive environment and a very high graduation rate. Also, be prepared for him to go onto a 5-year undergrad track.
With those scores, DC is really not a strong E School applicant. Test Scores really DO correlate strongly with success/failure in any E School.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What about RPI, WPI or RIT?
ODU?
My kid with a slightly higher SAT was offered only a non engineering acceptance at RIT.. Went to Clarkson. Is working as an engineer!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No shade on OP's child, but how do you get an A in AP classes and then get below a 3 on the actual exam?
Grade inflation. My kid is the same. But, also, they don't test well, and has learning disabilities that impact reading long text.
My NT kid got a couple of 3s. His SAT one and done was 1430.
Just like SATs, this board is skewed towards parents that report high scores.
Some ways you get 3s are:
1) Not much prep for exam
2) Course was fall semester, exam in May
3) Teacher's class is not pure AP compliant
4) Wide ability levels in the class, resulting in a curve
Somebody has to get the 1s, 2s, and 3s.
ETS has done an analysis that supposedly shows that even students who get a 1 or 2 have an advantage when taking the college class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Longwood
Towsend
VMI
CMU
I don't believe Longwood and Towson have engineering.
CMU= Carnegie Mellon? Incredibly competitive, even though it's "test optional."
VMI only if he has a sincere interest in becoming a military officer.
Anonymous wrote:What about RPI, WPI or RIT?
ODU?
Anonymous wrote:Whoops OP here, SAT score is 1290, 650 on math portion. Yes I know it’s still not stellar; that was his first rake. Also realized he did get a 4 in AP History.
Trying to focus on the assignment of a good list, no need for snarky comments about that’s why TO is bs. The kid is doing the best he can. Thanks for college suggestions.
Anonymous wrote:This is why the TO policies are such a BS.
Anonymous wrote:Case western, u of Rochester (I would Ed at both of these) and wpi or rit are if you don’t want to Ed. Others you mentioned are high reaches which could (maybe, if ED) work out in terms of admissions since urm but might not be best academic fit.
Anonymous wrote:those are uber reaches