Anonymous wrote:Swimming and track have to be the most fair. Can’t argue with a stopwatch.
Anonymous wrote:It's any sport where the best is decided in an objective and not subjective fashion. In soccer for example, yes the absolute best stick out, but there is a whole lot of middle ground where subjective criteria are taken into account for team selection.
In track, your time is your time. The fastest 100m runs the 100m.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You clowns buy into team sports and end up getting cut and fat and out of shape later in life
I want to move my kids from basketball and football to golf + tennis. And dad played in college. I just have a gut feeling it's not worth it and they could be just as happy with an individual life sport.
Sorry meant to add dad played football in college. He doesn't do any sports now. What a waste. Seems like individual sports just have lifelong benefits. Our golf and tennis team are hard to make but at the min. at least you can play post HS and college.
Golf a kid will play for life...because you can play a competitive game with other competitive golfers or you can easily play for fun with scratch golfers. Also, it's not like a competitive game of golf involves sprinting on the golf course...you can still walk leisurely (or now rent a cart) on the course. Honestly, it's hard to really be able to say that you are working out as a 50 year old because you continue to play golf.
Plenty of former tennis players don't play that often...plenty of former swimmers don't really swim in anything resembling training anymore..etc.
Lots of former basketball players still play basketball as adults. Not sure why you would think that isn't fairly popular for adults.
They don't swim or play tennis everyday but they do swim or play tennis regularly.
Golf and tennis are the two sports that you can play for life. As you get older, you can switch over to pickleball if tennis is too much for you. Golf and tennis are two of the sports that are objective and not subjective. The coach can not cut you from the team and put another inferior in the team because the scores do not lie. That being said, they are two of the hardest sports to make in high school, especially if you live in wealthy areas, and due to a small roster size.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You clowns buy into team sports and end up getting cut and fat and out of shape later in life
I want to move my kids from basketball and football to golf + tennis. And dad played in college. I just have a gut feeling it's not worth it and they could be just as happy with an individual life sport.
Sorry meant to add dad played football in college. He doesn't do any sports now. What a waste. Seems like individual sports just have lifelong benefits. Our golf and tennis team are hard to make but at the min. at least you can play post HS and college.
Golf a kid will play for life...because you can play a competitive game with other competitive golfers or you can easily play for fun with scratch golfers. Also, it's not like a competitive game of golf involves sprinting on the golf course...you can still walk leisurely (or now rent a cart) on the course. Honestly, it's hard to really be able to say that you are working out as a 50 year old because you continue to play golf.
Plenty of former tennis players don't play that often...plenty of former swimmers don't really swim in anything resembling training anymore..etc.
Lots of former basketball players still play basketball as adults. Not sure why you would think that isn't fairly popular for adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You clowns buy into team sports and end up getting cut and fat and out of shape later in life
I want to move my kids from basketball and football to golf + tennis. And dad played in college. I just have a gut feeling it's not worth it and they could be just as happy with an individual life sport.
Sorry meant to add dad played football in college. He doesn't do any sports now. What a waste. Seems like individual sports just have lifelong benefits. Our golf and tennis team are hard to make but at the min. at least you can play post HS and college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You clowns buy into team sports and end up getting cut and fat and out of shape later in life
I want to move my kids from basketball and football to golf + tennis. And dad played in college. I just have a gut feeling it's not worth it and they could be just as happy with an individual life sport.
Anonymous wrote:You clowns buy into team sports and end up getting cut and fat and out of shape later in life
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In *private* HS, apparently donor kids get the leg up. In public high schools, kids with difficult parents who complain all the time get the leg up (very toxic).
Anywhere you go, the kid who TRAINS PRIVATELY with the coach gets the leg up. Sickening.
Coaches would probably argue that shows the kid has a passion for the sport, no?
Of course, coaches would argue that. They have vested interest in maintaining the private training pipeline since most of them are selling private training.
What it shows is which kids gave parents with cash.
PP here. I'm just pointing out that this is not an argument that anyone but the coach is going to win. Doesn't make it right, but there's juuuuust enough gray here.
There’s really no gray here at all PP. it’s a conflict of interest and immoral
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All team sports are NOT fair because the coach can come up with any BS reasons to exclude someone from the team.
in 99% of cases, the reason is that the kid isn't good enough
In early youth sports, age or size bias can be a factor. Less so later but I’ve seen this often.
Eh I know a family frozen out from the higher level teams because the dad pissed off the wrong higher up in the club. It's an outlier situation, and generally I agree that coaches do the best they can, with biases at play for size/speed/aggressiveness.
This happens all the time.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All team sports are NOT fair because the coach can come up with any BS reasons to exclude someone from the team.
in 99% of cases, the reason is that the kid isn't good enough
In early youth sports, age or size bias can be a factor. Less so later but I’ve seen this often.
Eh I know a family frozen out from the higher level teams because the dad pissed off the wrong higher up in the club. It's an outlier situation, and generally I agree that coaches do the best they can, with biases at play for size/speed/aggressiveness.
Anonymous wrote:You clowns buy into team sports and end up getting cut and fat and out of shape later in life
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In *private* HS, apparently donor kids get the leg up. In public high schools, kids with difficult parents who complain all the time get the leg up (very toxic).
Anywhere you go, the kid who TRAINS PRIVATELY with the coach gets the leg up. Sickening.
Coaches would probably argue that shows the kid has a passion for the sport, no?
Of course, coaches would argue that. They have vested interest in maintaining the private training pipeline since most of them are selling private training.
What it shows is which kids gave parents with cash.
PP here. I'm just pointing out that this is not an argument that anyone but the coach is going to win. Doesn't make it right, but there's juuuuust enough gray here.
There’s really no gray here at all PP. it’s a conflict of interest and immoral
With the enormous increases in Tommy John surgeries for baseball and ACL tears for soccer (especially girls), someday someone is going to start taking a harder look at what is expected to make a varsity team and how kids are exploited for money by these Coach/trainers.
We were really angry to learn that timed running was supposed to be prohibited during tryouts (given health concerns), but guess what, soccer coaches at our school did it anyways.
Curious what this means. Is this due to conducting this kind of tryout in the August heat?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In *private* HS, apparently donor kids get the leg up. In public high schools, kids with difficult parents who complain all the time get the leg up (very toxic).
Anywhere you go, the kid who TRAINS PRIVATELY with the coach gets the leg up. Sickening.
Coaches would probably argue that shows the kid has a passion for the sport, no?
Of course, coaches would argue that. They have vested interest in maintaining the private training pipeline since most of them are selling private training.
What it shows is which kids gave parents with cash.
PP here. I'm just pointing out that this is not an argument that anyone but the coach is going to win. Doesn't make it right, but there's juuuuust enough gray here.
There’s really no gray here at all PP. it’s a conflict of interest and immoral
With the enormous increases in Tommy John surgeries for baseball and ACL tears for soccer (especially girls), someday someone is going to start taking a harder look at what is expected to make a varsity team and how kids are exploited for money by these Coach/trainers.
We were really angry to learn that timed running was supposed to be prohibited during tryouts (given health concerns), but guess what, soccer coaches at our school did it anyways.