Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you people accusing other posters of eating disorders are absurd. America has an obesity problem and it's largely because of the view that we need thousands upon thousands of calories when we simply don't. A 1200 or 1300 calorie diet is not anorexia. Get a damn grip.
It might not be anorexia but it is a sad way to live.
Maybe for you. But others might put a higher value on looking and feeling thin and less of a value on food (especially excess calories that give 30 seconds of satisfaction).
You can have both. Just lift weights and be active. I easily maintain at over 2000 calories and I am a size 2-4 at 5’6”
Age?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you people accusing other posters of eating disorders are absurd. America has an obesity problem and it's largely because of the view that we need thousands upon thousands of calories when we simply don't. A 1200 or 1300 calorie diet is not anorexia. Get a damn grip.
What does someone else's obesity problem have anything to do with your diet? This is what happens when you don't eat enough calories - you make illogical arguments like this.
1200 to 1300 calories is undereating. If you're doing it temporarily to lose weight, it means you know it's less than what your body needs to maintain itself. I bet you constantly think about food, look up calories before you eat something, and and get nervous during dinners with friends.
Again, temporarily underrating is NOT anorexia. It’s dieting. There’s a massive difference.
Anorexia is arguing that your dinner of chicken and vegetables isn't 200 calories, and is instead the same as the other poster that had chicken, vegetables, and pasta for 400 calories.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you people accusing other posters of eating disorders are absurd. America has an obesity problem and it's largely because of the view that we need thousands upon thousands of calories when we simply don't. A 1200 or 1300 calorie diet is not anorexia. Get a damn grip.
What does someone else's obesity problem have anything to do with your diet? This is what happens when you don't eat enough calories - you make illogical arguments like this.
1200 to 1300 calories is undereating. If you're doing it temporarily to lose weight, it means you know it's less than what your body needs to maintain itself. I bet you constantly think about food, look up calories before you eat something, and and get nervous during dinners with friends.
Again, temporarily underrating is NOT anorexia. It’s dieting. There’s a massive difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you people accusing other posters of eating disorders are absurd. America has an obesity problem and it's largely because of the view that we need thousands upon thousands of calories when we simply don't. A 1200 or 1300 calorie diet is not anorexia. Get a damn grip.
What does someone else's obesity problem have anything to do with your diet? This is what happens when you don't eat enough calories - you make illogical arguments like this.
1200 to 1300 calories is undereating. If you're doing it temporarily to lose weight, it means you know it's less than what your body needs to maintain itself. I bet you constantly think about food, look up calories before you eat something, and and get nervous during dinners with friends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you people accusing other posters of eating disorders are absurd. America has an obesity problem and it's largely because of the view that we need thousands upon thousands of calories when we simply don't. A 1200 or 1300 calorie diet is not anorexia. Get a damn grip.
It might not be anorexia but it is a sad way to live.
Maybe for you. But others might put a higher value on looking and feeling thin and less of a value on food (especially excess calories that give 30 seconds of satisfaction).
You can have both. Just lift weights and be active. I easily maintain at over 2000 calories and I am a size 2-4 at 5’6”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All you people accusing other posters of eating disorders are absurd. America has an obesity problem and it's largely because of the view that we need thousands upon thousands of calories when we simply don't. A 1200 or 1300 calorie diet is not anorexia. Get a damn grip.
It might not be anorexia but it is a sad way to live.
Maybe for you. But others might put a higher value on looking and feeling thin and less of a value on food (especially excess calories that give 30 seconds of satisfaction).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Coffee with 1/2 and 1/2
11:00 1/3 cup cream of wheat (no milk, just boiled water to make it) or low fat plain Greek yogurt with homemade unsweetened granola and a teaspoon of honey
Afternoon snack - fruit, nuts, 1/2 cup low-fat cottage cheeses, boiled egg white, or baby carrots
Dinner - 4oz chicken or fish and veggies
This is called anorexia
Hahaha I wish. I’m 174 pounds! That’s called a 52 year old perimenopausal woman with low iron, borderline cholesterol, and skirting the low end of overweight.
That’s 1,500 - 1,800 calories.
And a sad sad way to live. Do you exercise at all? I’m also a 52 year old in menopause and eat way more than that but I workout 5-6 days a week. Intense workouts most days not just walking. Normal weight. Id rather be fat then eat this way.
And she would rather eat this way than be fat. Why do you care?
She’s eating this way and IS FAT. Yes, that’s a sad life.