Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not sure what any of you guys are talking about with the quality at WAGs. I can’t speak for the other divisions but the 2011 girls looks solid top to bottom. Yes, there are a lot of teams, over a 100 at this age group alone on the girls side. But the top brackets have a ton of talent. Don’t see much need to go to NC to play beach or Richmond when you have Match fit, Arlington, Bethesda, NVA and plenty of other top talented teams around. But you enjoy that road trip to NC…again lol!
Matchfit RL team I believe but still good competition.
Anonymous wrote:Not sure what any of you guys are talking about with the quality at WAGs. I can’t speak for the other divisions but the 2011 girls looks solid top to bottom. Yes, there are a lot of teams, over a 100 at this age group alone on the girls side. But the top brackets have a ton of talent. Don’t see much need to go to NC to play beach or Richmond when you have Match fit, Arlington, Bethesda, NVA and plenty of other top talented teams around. But you enjoy that road trip to NC…again lol!
Anonymous wrote:Not sure what any of you guys are talking about with the quality at WAGs. I can’t speak for the other divisions but the 2011 girls looks solid top to bottom. Yes, there are a lot of teams, over a 100 at this age group alone on the girls side. But the top brackets have a ton of talent. Don’t see much need to go to NC to play beach or Richmond when you have Match fit, Arlington, Bethesda, NVA and plenty of other top talented teams around. But you enjoy that road trip to NC…again lol!
Anonymous wrote:Not sure what any of you guys are talking about with the quality at WAGs. I can’t speak for the other divisions but the 2011 girls looks solid top to bottom. Yes, there are a lot of teams, over a 100 at this age group alone on the girls side. But the top brackets have a ton of talent. Don’t see much need to go to NC to play beach or Richmond when you have Match fit, Arlington, Bethesda, NVA and plenty of other top talented teams around. But you enjoy that road trip to NC…again lol!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My prediction is that these tournaments (WAGS and Jeff Cup included) will continue to slide into inconsequential nothingness as ECNL hosts more and more ECNL events and showcases.
At least Jeff Cup still has an extensive list of college coaches that attend.
The ECNL NC event is U12-14 only. There are no college coaches at these pre-high school age group events.
My comment was in reference to the tournament itself where it started off mainly as college showcase before opening it up to younger age groups. It was a response to ECNL showcases being more of a draw which there is no debate. Why would college coaches go anywhere for U12-U14, regardless of tournament. WAGS is not what it was and it keeps declining each year in terms of scout attendance and level of teams attending.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My prediction is that these tournaments (WAGS and Jeff Cup included) will continue to slide into inconsequential nothingness as ECNL hosts more and more ECNL events and showcases.
At least Jeff Cup still has an extensive list of college coaches that attend.
The ECNL NC event is U12-14 only. There are no college coaches at these pre-high school age group events.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the top ECNL teams in some brackets. Whats the complaining about WAGS?
Can't have all the top teams if VDA isn't there!
Anonymous wrote:All the top ECNL teams in some brackets. Whats the complaining about WAGS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My prediction is that these tournaments (WAGS and Jeff Cup included) will continue to slide into inconsequential nothingness as ECNL hosts more and more ECNL events and showcases.
At least Jeff Cup still has an extensive list of college coaches that attend.