Anonymous wrote:OP here.
Are there no Trump voters who can explain how Trump’s policies will improve the U.S. economy?
Anonymous wrote:If you want products that are made that meet high environmental standards and treat workers well, you should support tarrifs.
Consuming dirty energy sources contributes to the climate crisis.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hey Maga voters - this is what you are voting for!
DCUM Trumpsters said they don’t like economists. It’s feelings over facts.
And they get their feelings from listening to Trump and sycophantic, lying talking heads and propagandists who withhold the facts from them.
Watch. They’ll watch Trump crash the economy again and call it fake news or the fault of the “Deep State”. I’m sure those posts are already ready to go.
Anonymous wrote:If you want products that are made that meet high environmental standards and treat workers well, you should support tarrifs.
Consuming dirty energy sources contributes to the climate crisis.
Anonymous wrote:If you want products that are made that meet high environmental standards and treat workers well, you should support tarrifs.
Consuming dirty energy sources contributes to the climate crisis.
Anonymous wrote:And UBS reports that his tariffs would bring the S&P 500 down 10% by next year.
Bye bye 401k.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/10/trumps-tariffs-could-push-sp-500-down-10-next-year-ubs-says/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hey Maga voters - this is what you are voting for!
DCUM Trumpsters said they don’t like economists. It’s feelings over facts.
And they get their feelings from listening to Trump and sycophantic, lying talking heads and propagandists who withhold the facts from them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hey Maga voters - this is what you are voting for!
DCUM Trumpsters said they don’t like economists. It’s feelings over facts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Hey Maga voters - this is what you are voting for!
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote: