Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no direct evidence that this crime spree was related to any kind of protest. Whether they were mad at a shooting or mad at something else or just wanted to commit a bunch of crimes, none of that reflects on the people in SE who were protesting the shooting. There's no direct link between the two. Stop mixing them together.

https://x.com/DCNewsLive/status/1833365789400854632

Protestors can be heard yelling “Don’t Shoot, I’m Sleep” in the background.

There's your direct evidence.

Someone shouting in the background means there's a protest?

If your point is that these people where using Justin's shooting as a justification for their looting, I agree with you. But if your point is that they chose last night at random to do their looting, completely unrelated to the shooting, I disagree with you -- for whatever reason, these people want to connect their looting to the shooting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no direct evidence that this crime spree was related to any kind of protest. Whether they were mad at a shooting or mad at something else or just wanted to commit a bunch of crimes, none of that reflects on the people in SE who were protesting the shooting. There's no direct link between the two. Stop mixing them together.

https://x.com/DCNewsLive/status/1833365789400854632

Protestors can be heard yelling “Don’t Shoot, I’m Sleep” in the background.

There's your direct evidence.

Someone shouting in the background means there's a protest?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's no direct evidence that this crime spree was related to any kind of protest. Whether they were mad at a shooting or mad at something else or just wanted to commit a bunch of crimes, none of that reflects on the people in SE who were protesting the shooting. There's no direct link between the two. Stop mixing them together.

https://x.com/DCNewsLive/status/1833365789400854632

Protestors can be heard yelling “Don’t Shoot, I’m Sleep” in the background.

There's your direct evidence.

Anonymous wrote:There's no direct evidence that this crime spree was related to any kind of protest. Whether they were mad at a shooting or mad at something else or just wanted to commit a bunch of crimes, none of that reflects on the people in SE who were protesting the shooting. There's no direct link between the two. Stop mixing them together.

Anonymous wrote:How can I contribute to a bail fund for these protestors like I did last time?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop using the word protest when it is a crime spree and not a protest?

Seriously. Robbing Gucci has nothing to do with Black Lives Matter. Cut it out.

Black Lives Matter is synonymous with looting. Inseparable.

Anonymous wrote:Tryin to ruin it for Harris. Ugh.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How can I contribute to a bail fund for these protestors like I did last time?

Can you start by explain how this counts as a "protest?" What did Gucci do that they are protesting?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are more concerned about the security of mass produced products than people being murdered by the government, you're not going to get sympathy.

Speak for yourself. Looting, assault, attempted murder, and arson aren't exactly doing wonders for civilization. To you it's a bunch of gucci bags. To others it's a breakdown in the rules and norms and public order that human beings need for society to function safely for everyone. I hope "The Government" prosecutes these people hard.

+1

It hurts the businesses in those areas (including employees who work there and people who shop there). It negatively affects residents and tourists who want to enjoy the area. It creates a downward spiral of crime. Insurance premiums go up for all sorts of businesses. Police officers (who aren’t all evil despite some narratives) are putting their own safety in danger.

But it feels good to try to act morally superior by making this about consumerism so people will tout this garbage while patting themselves heartily on the back.

ok, MAGA.

Dems don't want safety and security in their communities?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we stop using the word protest when it is a crime spree and not a protest?

Seriously. Robbing Gucci has nothing to do with Black Lives Matter. Cut it out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When you are more concerned about the security of mass produced products than people being murdered by the government, you're not going to get sympathy.

Speak for yourself. Looting, assault, attempted murder, and arson aren't exactly doing wonders for civilization. To you it's a bunch of gucci bags. To others it's a breakdown in the rules and norms and public order that human beings need for society to function safely for everyone. I hope "The Government" prosecutes these people hard.

+1

It hurts the businesses in those areas (including employees who work there and people who shop there). It negatively affects residents and tourists who want to enjoy the area. It creates a downward spiral of crime. Insurance premiums go up for all sorts of businesses. Police officers (who aren’t all evil despite some narratives) are putting their own safety in danger.

But it feels good to try to act morally superior by making this about consumerism so people will tout this garbage while patting themselves heartily on the back.

ok, MAGA.

Anonymous wrote:When we were in Italy this summer, clerks at the Gucci store in Florence said that the brand had been devalued because of the US looters. There is no exclusivity if you see a gangbanger with a Gucci bag.