Given how Asian American representation and accetance rate has increased after the supreme court decision, its clear that Asian American applicants are even more qualified (as defined by colleges, not test scores) than their pre-2024 admission rates would suggestAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they hate asians so much that they keep on accepting them in overwelmingly disppropotionate numbers.
reminds me of work, white male colleague/friend worried aloud whether he would make partner as a white male due to firm's commitment to diversity. even though every year the firm overwelmingly elevates white men.
the firm had, and has, 1 blk nonequity partner, 1 asian, maybe 2 latin, 1 gay, 30% women partners. meanwhile if a blk lady makes it, it is bc she is blk despite trend suggesting she must have been exceptional.
i told him they may not make him partner due to his inability to do math and discern appropriate conclusions from past data.
Asians may get accepted in disproportionate numbers, but they are even more disproportionately qualified.
https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/sat-percentile-ranks-gender-race-ethnicity.pdf
It's not even close.
The colleges determine what qualifies means in terms of admissions to their schools, not the people wanting admission. Just because you say that schools should only focus on tests and grades, doesn't mean that they have to. I can say they should focus on weight and height, and really really mean it, but doesn't mean schools have to believe this.
They get the selection bias of having parents who were smart/tenacious enough to be able to immigrate to the US from a country where it's very difficult to immigrate to the US to, and the culture of academic excellence that comes with it. Seems quite similar to children of East Asian immigrantsAnonymous wrote:South Asians get all the disadvantages of being Asians and none of the advantages.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they hate asians so much that they keep on accepting them in overwelmingly disppropotionate numbers.
reminds me of work, white male colleague/friend worried aloud whether he would make partner as a white male due to firm's commitment to diversity. even though every year the firm overwelmingly elevates white men.
the firm had, and has, 1 blk nonequity partner, 1 asian, maybe 2 latin, 1 gay, 30% women partners. meanwhile if a blk lady makes it, it is bc she is blk despite trend suggesting she must have been exceptional.
i told him they may not make him partner due to his inability to do math and discern appropriate conclusions from past data.
Asians may get accepted in disproportionate numbers, but they are even more disproportionately qualified.
https://satsuite.collegeboard.org/media/pdf/sat-percentile-ranks-gender-race-ethnicity.pdf
It's not even close.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t check the box.
But your name is Lee, you got an 800 math SAT, you have 15 APs, and your ECs are violin, tennis and robotics.
I think they’ll figure it out.
General Lee was Chinese?![]()
Anonymous wrote:or does it matter anymore? I still feel Asians are not given a full fair chance even with the change in affirmative action.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they hate asians so much that they keep on accepting them in overwelmingly disppropotionate numbers.
reminds me of work, white male colleague/friend worried aloud whether he would make partner as a white male due to firm's commitment to diversity. even though every year the firm overwelmingly elevates white men.
the firm had, and has, 1 blk nonequity partner, 1 asian, maybe 2 latin, 1 gay, 30% women partners. meanwhile if a blk lady makes it, it is bc she is blk despite trend suggesting she must have been exceptional.
i told him they may not make him partner due to his inability to do math and discern appropriate conclusions from past data.
your math skills and data analysis are sorely lacking, as is your critical thinking skills.
Asian Americans apply to top colleges in higher numbers proportional to their representation in the general population. You should be comparing the numbers of admits based on their % of the applicant pool, not the general population.
Same for your example:
The reason why white males are promoted a lot more is probably because there are a lot more white males up for the promotion. Statistically, a white male will get the promotion because of the larger number of white males in the pool.
In the military, there are a lot more male leaders because there are just a lot more males in the military, period.
Work on your critical thinking skills.
Hi strawman,
No in ea case it is disproportional to the the correct number. ie those up for promo etc. Where did I provide a wrong denominator or a denominator at all?
Anonymous wrote:they hate asians so much that they keep on accepting them in overwelmingly disppropotionate numbers.
reminds me of work, white male colleague/friend worried aloud whether he would make partner as a white male due to firm's commitment to diversity. even though every year the firm overwelmingly elevates white men.
the firm had, and has, 1 blk nonequity partner, 1 asian, maybe 2 latin, 1 gay, 30% women partners. meanwhile if a blk lady makes it, it is bc she is blk despite trend suggesting she must have been exceptional.
i told him they may not make him partner due to his inability to do math and discern appropriate conclusions from past data.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:College admissions officers do not view the race boxes in the Common App following the Supreme Court decision in summer 2023.
Obviously they see applicant and parents last names.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:South Asians get all the disadvantages of being Asians and none of the advantages.
What are the advantages?
I work in tech. Tons of South Asians, and several in leadership positions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they hate asians so much that they keep on accepting them in overwelmingly disppropotionate numbers.
reminds me of work, white male colleague/friend worried aloud whether he would make partner as a white male due to firm's commitment to diversity. even though every year the firm overwelmingly elevates white men.
the firm had, and has, 1 blk nonequity partner, 1 asian, maybe 2 latin, 1 gay, 30% women partners. meanwhile if a blk lady makes it, it is bc she is blk despite trend suggesting she must have been exceptional.
i told him they may not make him partner due to his inability to do math and discern appropriate conclusions from past data.
your math skills and data analysis are sorely lacking, as is your critical thinking skills.
Asian Americans apply to top colleges in higher numbers proportional to their representation in the general population. You should be comparing the numbers of admits based on their % of the applicant pool, not the general population.
Same for your example:
The reason why white males are promoted a lot more is probably because there are a lot more white males up for the promotion. Statistically, a white male will get the promotion because of the larger number of white males in the pool.
In the military, there are a lot more male leaders because there are just a lot more males in the military, period.
Work on your critical thinking skills.
Anonymous wrote:South Asians get all the disadvantages of being Asians and none of the advantages.
Anonymous wrote:they hate asians so much that they keep on accepting them in overwelmingly disppropotionate numbers.
reminds me of work, white male colleague/friend worried aloud whether he would make partner as a white male due to firm's commitment to diversity. even though every year the firm overwelmingly elevates white men.
the firm had, and has, 1 blk nonequity partner, 1 asian, maybe 2 latin, 1 gay, 30% women partners. meanwhile if a blk lady makes it, it is bc she is blk despite trend suggesting she must have been exceptional.
i told him they may not make him partner due to his inability to do math and discern appropriate conclusions from past data.