Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
I don't think anyone said the GDS letter was AI. It was clearly too personal to be so.
It is the title of the thread, and basis for all the posts, you are commenting on. It was a prior dumb post of day winner
Anonymous wrote:I have trouble taking a person seriously who uses the word "firstly" in a business letter.
Anonymous wrote:Yes to this. Stop the racists attacks on Yom, trolls.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
I don't think anyone said the GDS letter was AI. It was clearly too personal to be so.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes to this. Stop the racists attacks on Yom, trolls.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
Yom?
Anonymous wrote:Yes to this. Stop the racists attacks on Yom, trolls.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:LMAO! All I can say is “wow” in terms of the original post and the others stating that they ran their principal letters through ChatGPT. Must be nice to have so much free time on your hands that THIS is what gets you riled up.
My kids go to GDS. They’ve been there since Pre-K. While these principal letters can seem a bit boilerplate at times, they genuinely come off like the individuals who wrote them. Maybe if some of you actually took the time to have a conversation with the principals that might be obvious.
Whoever wrote that the GDS HS principal compared herself to Gandhi either clearly didn’t read the letter or has an agenda. Here is an exact lift from her letter:
“However, I've learned that there are two essential ways to approach feedback. Firstly, I see it as a valuable opportunity for growth. It allows us to examine our actions and ensure they align with our intentions. Secondly, I acknowledge that it's impossible to please everyone. Even the most revered figures like Gandhi and Mother Theresa had their critics. I remind myself that each person comes from a unique place with their own set of experiences, shaping their reactions. We can't always understand where people are coming from.”
To twist her words to fit your “narrative” is beyond weird.
FYI: For giggles I ran the GDS principal letters through ChatGPT. It said they were not AI written. But at the end of the day… what damn difference would it make? As long our children are getting a quality education why should something like this be the talking point?
There is a lot to complain about in terms of the school. Teacher turnover, the head of school’s salary, just to name a few. But this? Really? Grow up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This doesn’t bother me. If it frees the principal up to do the other 20,000 things he needs to get done, then fine.
If it is forbidden for students to use, then it's hypocritical.