Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slacs
Which ones??
Nearly all of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all super helpful.
The more I read, think and crunch the data/fees, I am inclined not to have my child apply / enroll at large public Flagships. For the out-of-state tuition prices, I just don’t think it’s worth it - with the limited amount of undergrad focused resources. The value isn’t there for me.
If you think your kid needs a bit more handholding, undergrad resources, student-centric staff, administration, and programming, are the schools listed above the ones we should be focusing on? Are there any others? How do we figure out the “spend” per undergraduate student?
Profile: private school senior girl, full pay, non-DMV. Humanities major, top GPA stats/rigor + high test scores. Looking for social, friendly schools with attention from faculty.
Any and all advice appreciated.
I think you're asking two separate things. Your first question was schools that take a disproportionate number of students from private high schools. Your second question was schools that offer more support/hand holding/advising. The schools in both those lists might overlap, but it isn't the same thing.
I could be wrong but I’d assume schools with larger % of private HS kids would offer more of these handholding, robust freshman/undergrad focused services? That these types of students would gravitate towards these schools?
Is that wrong?
not necessarily. Private school is going to correlate with the ability to pay more than with the need for hand holding. Some times the two overlap, but not always
What exactly is handholding in this context?
Advisors who know you exist as a freshman, teachers expected to know a students name, responsive student life department especially with respect to housing.... The SLAC I went to gave professors large budgets to host freshmen for group dinners and my advisor met with me multiple times and pushed me towards certain clubs all of which were lavishly funded. Basically they did everything possible to bring freshman into the school community. My spouse went to Cal. They joke that for the first two years they doubt that any school employee knew their name or cared that they existed
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slacs
Which ones??
Nearly all of them.
Not much at the top. More diversity and emphasis on public schools.
This seems to be true only of Swarthmore, which is 68 percent public school grads. Can’t find Williams data, but Amherst and Pomona are over 40 percent from independent/parochial schools.
Is 40% egregious now? That lines up for selecting some of the best students in the US.
It's high considering only 10% of K-12 students in the US attend private schools. I think what you mean is "lines up for selecting some of the richest students in the US."
-private school parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS (from private HS) attends a small (not super competitive LAC). It has a well developed freshman experience and your student's advisor is the teacher of a freshman seminar your kid takes.
Yesterday during campus move in, my DS ran into two professors that know his name and that he was excited to see.
These schools exist - look for good freshman experience, residential housing that is integrated into the academic program, small classes where you can know your professor and good advising.
Some suggestions might be Union College in NY, University of Denver, Elon.
on the other hand, my son's friend is a freshman at a big flagship out of state - the freshman had to move in a week early and there are no required activities - so the kid is basically sitting around with nothing to do. He hasn't made friends yet and it's the weekend and no classes until Monday. That seems really hard.
Like Rice?
Are all SLACs (mostly) like this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slacs
Which ones??
Nearly all of them.
Not much at the top. More diversity and emphasis on public schools.
This seems to be true only of Swarthmore, which is 68 percent public school grads. Can’t find Williams data, but Amherst and Pomona are over 40 percent from independent/parochial schools.
Is 40% egregious now? That lines up for selecting some of the best students in the US.
It's high considering only 10% of K-12 students in the US attend private schools. I think what you mean is "lines up for selecting some of the richest students in the US."
-private school parent.
Well unless we know the breakdown of the applicant pool, test scores, and HS grades, there is no way to tell whether they are overrepresented or not. Private school kids get higher test scores and are more likely to apply to these scores, so it is very possible that 4X representation at these schools is actual proportion after adjusting for confounding variables.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Slacs
Which ones??
Nearly all of them.
Not much at the top. More diversity and emphasis on public schools.
This seems to be true only of Swarthmore, which is 68 percent public school grads. Can’t find Williams data, but Amherst and Pomona are over 40 percent from independent/parochial schools.
Is 40% egregious now? That lines up for selecting some of the best students in the US.
It's high considering only 10% of K-12 students in the US attend private schools. I think what you mean is "lines up for selecting some of the richest students in the US."
-private school parent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My DS (from private HS) attends a small (not super competitive LAC). It has a well developed freshman experience and your student's advisor is the teacher of a freshman seminar your kid takes.
Yesterday during campus move in, my DS ran into two professors that know his name and that he was excited to see.
These schools exist - look for good freshman experience, residential housing that is integrated into the academic program, small classes where you can know your professor and good advising.
Some suggestions might be Union College in NY, University of Denver, Elon.
on the other hand, my son's friend is a freshman at a big flagship out of state - the freshman had to move in a week early and there are no required activities - so the kid is basically sitting around with nothing to do. He hasn't made friends yet and it's the weekend and no classes until Monday. That seems really hard.
My kid went on a week long camping with other freshmen trip in the Adirondacks led by the wilderness club. They showed up to move in already knowing a dozen kids. SLACs that care know how to make freshmen orientation work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all super helpful.
The more I read, think and crunch the data/fees, I am inclined not to have my child apply / enroll at large public Flagships. For the out-of-state tuition prices, I just don’t think it’s worth it - with the limited amount of undergrad focused resources. The value isn’t there for me.
If you think your kid needs a bit more handholding, undergrad resources, student-centric staff, administration, and programming, are the schools listed above the ones we should be focusing on? Are there any others? How do we figure out the “spend” per undergraduate student?
Profile: private school senior girl, full pay, non-DMV. Humanities major, top GPA stats/rigor + high test scores. Looking for social, friendly schools with attention from faculty.
Any and all advice appreciated.
Wake is
I think you're asking two separate things. Your first question was schools that take a disproportionate number of students from private high schools. Your second question was schools that offer more support/hand holding/advising. The schools in both those lists might overlap, but it isn't the same thing.
I could be wrong but I’d assume schools with larger % of private HS kids would offer more of these handholding, robust freshman/undergrad focused services? That these types of students would gravitate towards these schools?
Is that wrong?
not necessarily. Private school is going to correlate with the ability to pay more than with the need for hand holding. Some times the two overlap, but not always
What exactly is handholding in this context?
Advisors who know you exist as a freshman, teachers expected to know a students name, responsive student life department especially with respect to housing.... The SLAC I went to gave professors large budgets to host freshmen for group dinners and my advisor met with me multiple times and pushed me towards certain clubs all of which were lavishly funded. Basically they did everything possible to bring freshman into the school community. My spouse went to Cal. They joke that for the first two years they doubt that any school employee knew their name or cared that they existed
Would schools like Amherst; Middlebury; Bard; Lehigh; Colgate; Wake; Richmond fall into this category?
Wake might be getting too big, I would assume the rest will. Ask on tours, these are things admissions loves to brag about
Anonymous wrote:My DS (from private HS) attends a small (not super competitive LAC). It has a well developed freshman experience and your student's advisor is the teacher of a freshman seminar your kid takes.
Yesterday during campus move in, my DS ran into two professors that know his name and that he was excited to see.
These schools exist - look for good freshman experience, residential housing that is integrated into the academic program, small classes where you can know your professor and good advising.
Some suggestions might be Union College in NY, University of Denver, Elon.
on the other hand, my son's friend is a freshman at a big flagship out of state - the freshman had to move in a week early and there are no required activities - so the kid is basically sitting around with nothing to do. He hasn't made friends yet and it's the weekend and no classes until Monday. That seems really hard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all super helpful.
The more I read, think and crunch the data/fees, I am inclined not to have my child apply / enroll at large public Flagships. For the out-of-state tuition prices, I just don’t think it’s worth it - with the limited amount of undergrad focused resources. The value isn’t there for me.
If you think your kid needs a bit more handholding, undergrad resources, student-centric staff, administration, and programming, are the schools listed above the ones we should be focusing on? Are there any others? How do we figure out the “spend” per undergraduate student?
Profile: private school senior girl, full pay, non-DMV. Humanities major, top GPA stats/rigor + high test scores. Looking for social, friendly schools with attention from faculty.
Any and all advice appreciated.
I think you're asking two separate things. Your first question was schools that take a disproportionate number of students from private high schools. Your second question was schools that offer more support/hand holding/advising. The schools in both those lists might overlap, but it isn't the same thing.
I could be wrong but I’d assume schools with larger % of private HS kids would offer more of these handholding, robust freshman/undergrad focused services? That these types of students would gravitate towards these schools?
Is that wrong?
not necessarily. Private school is going to correlate with the ability to pay more than with the need for hand holding. Some times the two overlap, but not always
What exactly is handholding in this context?
Advisors who know you exist as a freshman, teachers expected to know a students name, responsive student life department especially with respect to housing.... The SLAC I went to gave professors large budgets to host freshmen for group dinners and my advisor met with me multiple times and pushed me towards certain clubs all of which were lavishly funded. Basically they did everything possible to bring freshman into the school community. My spouse went to Cal. They joke that for the first two years they doubt that any school employee knew their name or cared that they existed
Would schools like Amherst; Middlebury; Bard; Lehigh; Colgate; Wake; Richmond fall into this category?