Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Ditto.

You had an established, hard working Black man working to improve his city.

And then you had this entitled brat with sh!tty parents. Charge the kid's family members - they're the one who failed Karon, not Jason Lewis.

Car-brain makes people do craaaaazy things

What does this mean?

It means the pp's bike shorts have squeezed his balls too hard for him to form a coherent sentence.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Ditto.

You had an established, hard working Black man working to improve his city.

And then you had this entitled brat with sh!tty parents. Charge the kid's family members - they're the one who failed Karon, not Jason Lewis.

Car-brain makes people do craaaaazy things

What does this mean?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's unfortunate. The Parks and Rec employee was a hard working guy with an important job. Did the entitled thief kid's parents get charged with anything?

Why would they? Kids make mistakes. News flash: a dumba55 13 year old who breaks into cars doesn't deserve to die.

You're not wrong, but what's your solution? Sadly, this isn't the last time something like this happens. We need to hold parents ACCOUNTABLE.

At the very least, the parents should be in prison as long as Lewis is there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's unfortunate. The Parks and Rec employee was a hard working guy with an important job. Did the entitled thief kid's parents get charged with anything?

Why would they? Kids make mistakes. News flash: a dumba55 13 year old who breaks into cars doesn't deserve to die.

You're not wrong, but what's your solution? Sadly, this isn't the last time something like this happens. We need to hold parents ACCOUNTABLE.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Agreed, but what do we know about the claim the the kid was running towards the shooter? That being credible would be the make or break issue for me on self-defense.

It's a lie, just like how he lied on the stand about taking shots. Just face it, he over-reacted because his car-brain went into overdrive and he wanted to teach a lesson who someone committing a property crime. He got what he deserved.

There was a video, wasn't there? But it was too low quality for me to see what was going on.

Did the prosecution dispute the kid was running towards him?

He was shot in the chest. Yes, he was running towards him.

Any supporters of the prosecution have an explanation of this?

The issue seems to have been that the prosecution said that Lewis came out, shot once or twice at the car/group, then when Blake stay running towards him, shot again. The defense said that Lewis heard a sound that he thought was a gunshot, that he thought they were shooting, then fired when one of them started coming towards him. The initial video wasn't clear, whether Lewis shot first or they did or no one did until Blake was running towards Lewis. I don't think the prosecution said how many times, total, that Lewis fired his gun.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Agreed, but what do we know about the claim the the kid was running towards the shooter? That being credible would be the make or break issue for me on self-defense.

It's a lie, just like how he lied on the stand about taking shots. Just face it, he over-reacted because his car-brain went into overdrive and he wanted to teach a lesson who someone committing a property crime. He got what he deserved.

There was a video, wasn't there? But it was too low quality for me to see what was going on.

Did the prosecution dispute the kid was running towards him?

He was shot in the chest. Yes, he was running towards him.

Any supporters of the prosecution have an explanation of this?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Agreed, but what do we know about the claim the the kid was running towards the shooter? That being credible would be the make or break issue for me on self-defense.

It's a lie, just like how he lied on the stand about taking shots. Just face it, he over-reacted because his car-brain went into overdrive and he wanted to teach a lesson who someone committing a property crime. He got what he deserved.

There was a video, wasn't there? But it was too low quality for me to see what was going on.

Did the prosecution dispute the kid was running towards him?

He was shot in the chest. Yes, he was running towards him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Agreed, but what do we know about the claim the the kid was running towards the shooter? That being credible would be the make or break issue for me on self-defense.

It's a lie, just like how he lied on the stand about taking shots. Just face it, he over-reacted because his car-brain went into overdrive and he wanted to teach a lesson who someone committing a property crime. He got what he deserved.

There was a video, wasn't there? But it was too low quality for me to see what was going on.

Did the prosecution dispute the kid was running towards him?

Anonymous wrote:
Agreed, but what do we know about the claim the the kid was running towards the shooter? That being credible would be the make or break issue for me on self-defense.

It's a lie, just like how he lied on the stand about taking shots. Just face it, he over-reacted because his car-brain went into overdrive and he wanted to teach a lesson who someone committing a property crime. He got what he deserved.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just be a stupid, placid victim. Good little boy, stay in your home and cower in fear. The Government will do everything for you.

Property crimes don't deserve violent retribution. Sorry to break it to you. This man is getting exactly what he deserved.

Does he deserve the same exact sentence as a guy who shot a man in front of his two kids in a targeted murder?

https://wjla.com/news/local/jarell-harris-sentenced-13-years-in-prison-sedrick-miller-two-children-homicide-murder-manslaughter-police-charged-guilty-5-year-old-car-seat-2300-block-of-18th-street-northeast

The judicial system in this city is deranged.

Yeah. I don't think this guy should have walked, but the sentence seems inappropriate for the circumstances. 5-10 years is what I expected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:That's unfortunate. The Parks and Rec employee was a hard working guy with an important job. Did the entitled thief kid's parents get charged with anything?

Why would they? Kids make mistakes. News flash: a dumba55 13 year old who breaks into cars doesn't deserve to die.

Agreed, but what do we know about the claim the the kid was running towards the shooter? That being credible would be the make or break issue for me on self-defense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Accidentally taking someone's bag is a mistake. This kid was a repeat thief and criminal.

A 13 year old who plays adult crimes deserves adult times. Or at least, their parents do.

Moral people don't endorse vigilante violence over minor property crimes and no matter your whining, car break-ins are minor. Don't like it? Move to Texas. I'm sure you'll love it there. Otherwise STFU

Moral people don't endorse negligent parents or kids stealing repeatedly from hard working people.

There's a middle ground between Texas and DC, where maybe we can enjoy the fruits of our labor and also hold parents responsible for their negligence.

Anonymous wrote:
It's the price negligent bad parents have to pay.

True

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They should charge the parents too.

Or maybe they should enact the death penalty on their oldest son? Oh, that already happened? I'd say they've been punished.

It's the price negligent bad parents have to pay.

Anonymous wrote:
Ditto.

You had an established, hard working Black man working to improve his city.

And then you had this entitled brat with sh!tty parents. Charge the kid's family members - they're the one who failed Karon, not Jason Lewis.

Car-brain makes people do craaaaazy things