Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 5th grader was just diagnosed with dyslexia. We just paid $5k for the testing and just set up a reading tutoring program 4x a week that will add up to $12k for the school year. Her public school can help with supports but can’t offer any kind of OG tutoring, I imagine that’s the norm.
Luckily we can swing this, but how do low income people afford this?
Pretty sure the public school is required to provide supports
Anonymous wrote:My 5th grader was just diagnosed with dyslexia. We just paid $5k for the testing and just set up a reading tutoring program 4x a week that will add up to $12k for the school year. Her public school can help with supports but can’t offer any kind of OG tutoring, I imagine that’s the norm.
Luckily we can swing this, but how do low income people afford this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine a place where -
All children were screened for dyslexia?
All reading instruction was "OG" (or another approach that supported students with dyslexia)
All children would benefit from this approach - not just students with Dyslexia. The costs to train teachers would offset the down stream costs.
But no - the money goes to those who can lobby the strongest. [I am looking at you Reading Recovery].
It is criminal as they knew that the approach they were using was not supporting children.
This. One million percent.
- Former Reading Specialist
It's not viable in a public school where class sizes approach 30. OG relies on 1 on 1 or extremely small group instruction.
So if teaching kids to read isn’t a viable option, then what is the point of school systems. Truly, it seems like the bare minimum that should be accomplished in schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine a place where -
All children were screened for dyslexia?
All reading instruction was "OG" (or another approach that supported students with dyslexia)
All children would benefit from this approach - not just students with Dyslexia. The costs to train teachers would offset the down stream costs.
But no - the money goes to those who can lobby the strongest. [I am looking at you Reading Recovery].
It is criminal as they knew that the approach they were using was not supporting children.
This. One million percent.
- Former Reading Specialist
It's not viable in a public school where class sizes approach 30. OG relies on 1 on 1 or extremely small group instruction.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Imagine a place where -
All children were screened for dyslexia?
All reading instruction was "OG" (or another approach that supported students with dyslexia)
All children would benefit from this approach - not just students with Dyslexia. The costs to train teachers would offset the down stream costs.
But no - the money goes to those who can lobby the strongest. [I am looking at you Reading Recovery].
It is criminal as they knew that the approach they were using was not supporting children.
This. One million percent.
- Former Reading Specialist
Anonymous wrote:Imagine a place where -
All children were screened for dyslexia?
All reading instruction was "OG" (or another approach that supported students with dyslexia)
All children would benefit from this approach - not just students with Dyslexia. The costs to train teachers would offset the down stream costs.
But no - the money goes to those who can lobby the strongest. [I am looking at you Reading Recovery].
It is criminal as they knew that the approach they were using was not supporting children.
Anonymous wrote:I think about this all the time, too. I remember reading somewhere on this forum about an advocacy organization... I want to file it under my 5th career, when the load of overseeing some of this special ed stuff is done.
Anonymous wrote:Low-income kids don't suffer quite as much as middle-class kids, though. Almost all low-income kids have Medicaid which provides PT, OT, speech therapy, etc. Are those services provided the best available? No, but it is something.
What really hurts the low-income kids is not having support at home. I used to work in a VA school system with a large population of low-income families. The kids who thrived the most were those who had supportive parents to also go over therapies with the kids at home and do extra work.
It's pathetic that not all kids are eligible for Medicaid in the US. Private insurance that so many middle-class moms and dads have through their jobs either covers no extra services or very few sessions, like under 10.
Anonymous wrote:How much does it cost to get certified as a OG tutor? If I was starting in early elementary or had more than 1 kid that needed help, I’d at least do the math to figure out if there was a positive ROI there.