Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think people account for cultural biases when considering living standards. It's not just a numbers game but also lifestyle. Europeans don't have to eat a lot of processed foods to really enjoy their food. So they don't need 20 different cereals and can be happy with 3-4 brands if not 1-2. So costs of dining right there is apples to oranges. They don't have to worry about health insurance, children's prek and such. So what you save in fixed costs come into play for standard of living. Personally if I'm poorer in a small town in France v MS, I'd still prefer to be in France because at least my overall expenses are less than needing x amount to live a certain lifestyle in MS. It's not just daily food and mortgage to consider.
Americans tend to overestimate social benefits in European countries. Even friends in Northern European countries deal with expenses and challenges with childcare, parental leave etc.
For example there isn’t a country in the world with parental leave without a cap. That cap is often very low, such as $250 a week. This extremely generous parental leave that Americans are so envious of is often a little over $1k a month. Hardly enough to live off of in an expensive European city. Yes, it’s better than having to quit your job but European countries have horrible labor markets and it’s not easy to enter and exit jobs like it is here.
My European friends might not pay high childcare costs but they talk about energy bills which is something I have never heard discussed socially here in the US. They also deal with higher transportation costs, gasoline prices and consumer goods being more expensive than here. On top of this their salaries are much lower.
Every statistic shows that someone living in France or the UK has less disposable income than the average American. On top of that they have smaller homes and fewer cars. It makes sense they have less money. What do they produce or innovate and how much do they work? Far less than Americans.
Anonymous wrote:Our houses are just huge here:
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people account for cultural biases when considering living standards. It's not just a numbers game but also lifestyle. Europeans don't have to eat a lot of processed foods to really enjoy their food. So they don't need 20 different cereals and can be happy with 3-4 brands if not 1-2. So costs of dining right there is apples to oranges. They don't have to worry about health insurance, children's prek and such. So what you save in fixed costs come into play for standard of living. Personally if I'm poorer in a small town in France v MS, I'd still prefer to be in France because at least my overall expenses are less than needing x amount to live a certain lifestyle in MS. It's not just daily food and mortgage to consider.
Anonymous wrote:We visited Italy, France and Monaco this summer and I was surprised that the prices overall were significantly less than the US.
Hotel rooms are definitely cheaper, the cost of food is significantly cheaper : a good croissant in Paris is 1.20 euros vs $5-$6 here at a comparable bakery. A scoop of icecream in Venice and Monaco is 3 euros vs $6-$7 here.
Restaurant food is almost half the price in Europe when you account for taxes and tips in the US ( not to mention you get better tasting food there).
I get the Covid stimulus packages passed in the US contribute to inflation but many European countries also passed those.
Why has inflation hit the US much harder?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Important to point out that a massive driver of EU inflation was the Ukraine war and huge energy costs. In contrast, the US actually benefited from the war.
Economically? How so?
Anonymous wrote:I don't think people account for cultural biases when considering living standards. It's not just a numbers game but also lifestyle. Europeans don't have to eat a lot of processed foods to really enjoy their food. So they don't need 20 different cereals and can be happy with 3-4 brands if not 1-2. So costs of dining right there is apples to oranges. They don't have to worry about health insurance, children's prek and such. So what you save in fixed costs come into play for standard of living. Personally if I'm poorer in a small town in France v MS, I'd still prefer to be in France because at least my overall expenses are less than needing x amount to live a certain lifestyle in MS. It's not just daily food and mortgage to consider.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmers in the EU are heavily subsidized so the price of actual groceries are cheaper. Also, salaries are lower so restaurant prices are lower. Add to that a very favorable exchange rate for the U.S. and it can seem cheap to us. But compared to European salaries, it’s not cheap.
This. Europeans are relatively poor. Mississippi has a higher gdp per capita than all but a handful of European countries and the gdp per capita for the UK is roughly the same as Mississippi (the poorest US state).
Interesting. I had to look that up and compared the different countries of Europe to Mississippi. I had no idea.
When considering purchasing power parity and inequality, median UK is 20% richer than median Mississippi.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/amesbrown/2018/04/03/tax-reform-college-endowments/?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:American corporate greed and shareholder expectations, with low government regulation.
Companies took the Covid excuse to raise prices as much as they could get away with without decreasing demand for their product.
Also once the few top companies started cutting their workforce 10%, almost all the Fortune 500 companies took the opportunity to do the same.
Result- record corporate profits and stock market performance for last 3 years
Corporate profits have not outpaced actual inflation. The value of the money is dropping rapidly due to inflating the money supply since 2008. If corporate profits weren’t “up” then profits would be in the toilet adjusted for inflation.
Plus, the "record for the last three years" thing conveniently avoids the fact that corporate profits were mostly very low four years ago. What has happened is that corporate profits have recovered to where they were before, adjusted for inflation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:American corporate greed and shareholder expectations, with low government regulation.
Companies took the Covid excuse to raise prices as much as they could get away with without decreasing demand for their product.
Also once the few top companies started cutting their workforce 10%, almost all the Fortune 500 companies took the opportunity to do the same.
Result- record corporate profits and stock market performance for last 3 years
Corporate profits have not outpaced actual inflation. The value of the money is dropping rapidly due to inflating the money supply since 2008. If corporate profits weren’t “up” then profits would be in the toilet adjusted for inflation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmers in the EU are heavily subsidized so the price of actual groceries are cheaper. Also, salaries are lower so restaurant prices are lower. Add to that a very favorable exchange rate for the U.S. and it can seem cheap to us. But compared to European salaries, it’s not cheap.
This. Europeans are relatively poor. Mississippi has a higher gdp per capita than all but a handful of European countries and the gdp per capita for the UK is roughly the same as Mississippi (the poorest US state).
Interesting. I had to look that up and compared the different countries of Europe to Mississippi. I had no idea.
When considering purchasing power parity and inequality, median UK is 20% richer than median Mississippi.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/amesbrown/2018/04/03/tax-reform-college-endowments/?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Farmers in the EU are heavily subsidized so the price of actual groceries are cheaper. Also, salaries are lower so restaurant prices are lower. Add to that a very favorable exchange rate for the U.S. and it can seem cheap to us. But compared to European salaries, it’s not cheap.
This. Europeans are relatively poor. Mississippi has a higher gdp per capita than all but a handful of European countries and the gdp per capita for the UK is roughly the same as Mississippi (the poorest US state).
Interesting. I had to look that up and compared the different countries of Europe to Mississippi. I had no idea.