Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ex and I got pregnant the first time we had sex. That was NOT ideal. We hadn't been dating long enough to get married, but had the baby. He's a decent catch- good looking, financially stable, educated, smart, owns a home. Nice family. Decent dad. If someone rejected him just because we never married, they would be pretty stupid.
Why didn't you have an abortion in this circumstance?
huge red flag on both of you.
Even if your answer is "My values are that I could never have an abortion" - then that is a religious red flag to stay far, far away from you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol. So divorce establishes the permission structure. “See? I’m not the only one who thought he was marriage material.”
So weird.
No, that is not the logic. I’d marry someone who was never married as well. Divorce says….I think having a baby with someone is serious enough to warrant marriage. It sucks that the marriage didn’t work out. There is surely stuff to investigate on why it ended. But we are on the same page with respect to the importance of kids being born inside of marriage. Everyone doesn’t have to agree. Those just happen to be my values, and something I want my partner to agree with.
Anonymous wrote:In some cultures it is the norm.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ex and I got pregnant the first time we had sex. That was NOT ideal. We hadn't been dating long enough to get married, but had the baby. He's a decent catch- good looking, financially stable, educated, smart, owns a home. Nice family. Decent dad. If someone rejected him just because we never married, they would be pretty stupid.
Why didn't you have an abortion in this circumstance?
huge red flag on both of you.
Even if your answer is "My values are that I could never have an abortion" - then that is a religious red flag to stay far, far away from you.
Anonymous wrote:My ex and I got pregnant the first time we had sex. That was NOT ideal. We hadn't been dating long enough to get married, but had the baby. He's a decent catch- good looking, financially stable, educated, smart, owns a home. Nice family. Decent dad. If someone rejected him just because we never married, they would be pretty stupid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:lol. So divorce establishes the permission structure. “See? I’m not the only one who thought he was marriage material.”
So weird.
No, that is not the logic. I’d marry someone who was never married as well. Divorce says….I think having a baby with someone is serious enough to warrant marriage. It sucks that the marriage didn’t work out. There is surely stuff to investigate on why it ended. But we are on the same page with respect to the importance of kids being born inside of marriage. Everyone doesn’t have to agree. Those just happen to be my values, and something I want my partner to agree with.
Anonymous wrote:lol. So divorce establishes the permission structure. “See? I’m not the only one who thought he was marriage material.”
So weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My ex and I got pregnant the first time we had sex. That was NOT ideal. We hadn't been dating long enough to get married, but had the baby. He's a decent catch- good looking, financially stable, educated, smart, owns a home. Nice family. Decent dad. If someone rejected him just because we never married, they would be pretty stupid.
Why don’t you marry him if he became such a catch then?
Anonymous wrote:My ex and I got pregnant the first time we had sex. That was NOT ideal. We hadn't been dating long enough to get married, but had the baby. He's a decent catch- good looking, financially stable, educated, smart, owns a home. Nice family. Decent dad. If someone rejected him just because we never married, they would be pretty stupid.
Anonymous wrote:One kid out of wedlock, fine.
More than one, no way.