Anonymous wrote:https://math.cornell.edu/lower-level-courses (scroll to bottom)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
Cite?
https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~allenk/courses/14/2230/
Compre this to the freshman math options at most other lower ranked schools (e.g. any VA school besides UVA)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
+1000
Anonymous wrote:Reed is a good counterexample, but the fact that it's memorable to you indicates that it is indeed rate and thus an exception that proves the rule.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not unique, but it is uncommon, especially outside T50 schools. For example, there is no such course at any VA school besides UVA. Most schools only have the equivalent of Cornell's math 1920 (ordinary calc 3) or math 2220 (honors calc 3, with proofs), with nothing matching the math 2230/2240 sequence.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://math.cornell.edu/lower-level-courses (scroll to bottom)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
Cite?
https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~allenk/courses/14/2230/
Compre this to the freshman math options at most other lower ranked schools (e.g. any VA school besides UVA)
Post the syllabus from a VA school to backup your claim.
DP. Very few schools are teaching a course like that.
I'm lost. As someone with a math degree, many colleges teach vector calculus. This is just Calc 3 for math majors and is not at all unique to Cornell.
Seems like a virginia issue, plus not all colleges have the same name for courses, or teach them at the same time or in the same course structure. It's actually very difficult to compare across curriculums if you don't have access to a syllabus...Typically linear algebra/multivariable is a vector calculus course that separates it from MV calc. Really these skills can be taught in anything from 1-3 different courses, and that's a department structure thing more than anything.
When I think of unique math courses, I think of Math 112 at Reed for freshman or famously Math 55
Reed is a good counterexample, but the fact that it's memorable to you indicates that it is indeed rate and thus an exception that proves the rule.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not unique, but it is uncommon, especially outside T50 schools. For example, there is no such course at any VA school besides UVA. Most schools only have the equivalent of Cornell's math 1920 (ordinary calc 3) or math 2220 (honors calc 3, with proofs), with nothing matching the math 2230/2240 sequence.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://math.cornell.edu/lower-level-courses (scroll to bottom)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
Cite?
https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~allenk/courses/14/2230/
Compre this to the freshman math options at most other lower ranked schools (e.g. any VA school besides UVA)
Post the syllabus from a VA school to backup your claim.
DP. Very few schools are teaching a course like that.
I'm lost. As someone with a math degree, many colleges teach vector calculus. This is just Calc 3 for math majors and is not at all unique to Cornell.
Seems like a virginia issue, plus not all colleges have the same name for courses, or teach them at the same time or in the same course structure. It's actually very difficult to compare across curriculums if you don't have access to a syllabus...Typically linear algebra/multivariable is a vector calculus course that separates it from MV calc. Really these skills can be taught in anything from 1-3 different courses, and that's a department structure thing more than anything.
When I think of unique math courses, I think of Math 112 at Reed for freshman or famously Math 55
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
It is not the faculty difference that makes the distinction, it is the peer group that drives how fast and to what depth the courses can be taught. PPs are focusing on math. Humanities is similar: the amount of outside reading and primary source use outside the text is vastly accelerated at T10s. The differences are easy to see when you have four kids who have gone through four different schools .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
+1000
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
No. Ask faculty who have taught at both. Look at course syllabi. We have multiple relatives who are phD and md-phd who are teaching at a wide range of places. The faculty themselves are not too different barring the very top schools who tend to hire from each other, but the student set is vastly different: they can detail how much they have to water down and slow the pace when they teach at (unnamed 40-something) vs ivy. All institutions put pressure on faculty to keep the average student receiving no lower than a B : they have to rework their courses from what they taught as T10 postdoc, or risk not advancing to tenure. Parents are highly involved and students can ruin a professor on ratings or complaints to the dept chair.
Anonymous wrote:College prestige does not matter to me as a parent. Just want a great education that leads to a good job.
Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
Anonymous wrote:https://math.cornell.edu/lower-level-courses (scroll to bottom)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m just happy that people aren’t putting 3 at the top. There’s too many PhDs coming out of the Ivy league, let alone the rest of the T50, to even begin suggesting that there’s some extreme difference in education. Unless your kid is on the bounds and is highly highly intelligent (like top 0.001%) where they need specialized/accelerated instruction to the level of grad school near freshman year, you’re probably receiving a very similar education to others.
Even a standard freshman course like math 2230 at Cornell will exceed the level of rigor of any freshman math course at most lower ranked universities
Cite?
https://pi.math.cornell.edu/~allenk/courses/14/2230/
Compre this to the freshman math options at most other lower ranked schools (e.g. any VA school besides UVA)