Anonymous wrote:Great weekend for the 2008s.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington would have to restructure its program from the ground up. This would mean changing out most of its coaching staff and developing skilled players. At the older ages midfield wins. Arlington seems to develop fullbacks. If the best player on your team is a fullback you are in trouble.
Arlington’s player pool size hides a lot of mediocre coaching and “development” issues that show as players age up.
Arlington needs a change is direction. New club philosophy that is reflected in the coaches. There is a reason certain coaches stay, new coaches go and the results over time remain the same.
“A football team is like a piano. You need eight men to carry it and three who can play the damn thing.”
Start developing the three.
Anonymous wrote:College commits are meaningless for that area, most girls are committing and getting accepted for reasons other than soccer I would imagine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arlington would have to restructure its program from the ground up. This would mean changing out most of its coaching staff and developing skilled players. At the older ages midfield wins. Arlington seems to develop fullbacks. If the best player on your team is a fullback you are in trouble.
Arlington’s player pool size hides a lot of mediocre coaching and “development” issues that show as players age up.
Arlington needs a change is direction. New club philosophy that is reflected in the coaches. There is a reason certain coaches stay, new coaches go and the results over time remain the same.
“A football team is like a piano. You need eight men to carry it and three who can play the damn thing.”
Start developing the three.
Does Arlington have any good coaches?
With that player base and average family income in that area, you don't need good coaches.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington would have to restructure its program from the ground up. This would mean changing out most of its coaching staff and developing skilled players. At the older ages midfield wins. Arlington seems to develop fullbacks. If the best player on your team is a fullback you are in trouble.
Arlington’s player pool size hides a lot of mediocre coaching and “development” issues that show as players age up.
Arlington needs a change is direction. New club philosophy that is reflected in the coaches. There is a reason certain coaches stay, new coaches go and the results over time remain the same.
“A football team is like a piano. You need eight men to carry it and three who can play the damn thing.”
Start developing the three.
Anonymous wrote:Color me unconvinced. We play for a rival club and have played against their ECNL, ECRL, and NCSL girls and boys teams over the years. While my kids' teams have generally had success, I feel like Arlington is one of the higher quality programs around, and their teams are usually competitive. You could say it's just the player pool, and I've never attended an Arlington practice, but they feel well coached from watching them in games.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arlington would have to restructure its program from the ground up. This would mean changing out most of its coaching staff and developing skilled players. At the older ages midfield wins. Arlington seems to develop fullbacks. If the best player on your team is a fullback you are in trouble.
Arlington’s player pool size hides a lot of mediocre coaching and “development” issues that show as players age up.
Arlington needs a change is direction. New club philosophy that is reflected in the coaches. There is a reason certain coaches stay, new coaches go and the results over time remain the same.
“A football team is like a piano. You need eight men to carry it and three who can play the damn thing.”
Start developing the three.
Why the restructure? What is wrong now? They are doing fine. College commits are strong. That is the test.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington would have to restructure its program from the ground up. This would mean changing out most of its coaching staff and developing skilled players. At the older ages midfield wins. Arlington seems to develop fullbacks. If the best player on your team is a fullback you are in trouble.
Arlington’s player pool size hides a lot of mediocre coaching and “development” issues that show as players age up.
Arlington needs a change is direction. New club philosophy that is reflected in the coaches. There is a reason certain coaches stay, new coaches go and the results over time remain the same.
“A football team is like a piano. You need eight men to carry it and three who can play the damn thing.”
Start developing the three.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Arlington would have to restructure its program from the ground up. This would mean changing out most of its coaching staff and developing skilled players. At the older ages midfield wins. Arlington seems to develop fullbacks. If the best player on your team is a fullback you are in trouble.
Arlington’s player pool size hides a lot of mediocre coaching and “development” issues that show as players age up.
Arlington needs a change is direction. New club philosophy that is reflected in the coaches. There is a reason certain coaches stay, new coaches go and the results over time remain the same.
“A football team is like a piano. You need eight men to carry it and three who can play the damn thing.”
Start developing the three.
Does Arlington have any good coaches?