Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
All the posts justifying wearing these suits, prove my point. “My kid only wears it to qualify for all stars or in a close meet.”
This is a recreational league, allowance of expensive swimsuits that give an advantage to a swimmer is certainly unfair, even if it is within the rules.
You don’t think this same discrepancy between the haves / have nots are in every other sports? Come on. At the Olympic level there was just a story about a woman’s team that didn’t have cleats. It’s everywhere and in every sport.
And most people complaining about tech suits I’ve found, are peoples who’s kids have a half dozen of them, and just choose not to wear them at MCSL meets. These kids get beat at their meets and the parents are frustrated and blame it on the tech suit externality. In reality, the suits are more of a mindset. The kids who care wear them and kick the butt of the kids who aren’t locked in and choose not wear theirs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
I'm baffled by people that think club swimmers shouldn't be allowed in summer swim. Would there even be a league if you did this? Our team would lose about 1/3rd of swimmers/families. Good luck raising dues by 33% and requiring the remaining families to pick up the volunteer slots.
A large part of the motivation for my kids to swim club is so they can swim A meets in the summer.
Nowhere did I say club swimmers shouldn’t be allowed in summer swim. I just think one is being deliberately obtuse to not understand why people have a problem with kids wearing $600 swim suits that give them an edge on top of the fact those same kids are benefiting from the expensive year round training that others cannot afford.
Surely, you can understand that.
2. None of these kids are wearing new tech suits and tech suits are really beneficial the first handful of wears.
This part is not true at all. Most tech suits are extremely beneficial for a ton of swims. This is a myth that the suit companies want you to believe, that a suit only has power for a certain amount of swims
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
I'm baffled by people that think club swimmers shouldn't be allowed in summer swim. Would there even be a league if you did this? Our team would lose about 1/3rd of swimmers/families. Good luck raising dues by 33% and requiring the remaining families to pick up the volunteer slots.
A large part of the motivation for my kids to swim club is so they can swim A meets in the summer.
Nowhere did I say club swimmers shouldn’t be allowed in summer swim. I just think one is being deliberately obtuse to not understand why people have a problem with kids wearing $600 swim suits that give them an edge on top of the fact those same kids are benefiting from the expensive year round training that others cannot afford.
Surely, you can understand that.
2. None of these kids are wearing new tech suits and tech suits are really beneficial the first handful of wears.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
All the posts justifying wearing these suits, prove my point. “My kid only wears it to qualify for all stars or in a close meet.”
This is a recreational league, allowance of expensive swimsuits that give an advantage to a swimmer is certainly unfair, even if it is within the rules.
You don’t think this same discrepancy between the haves / have nots are in every other sports? Come on. At the Olympic level there was just a story about a woman’s team that didn’t have cleats. It’s everywhere and in every sport.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
All the posts justifying wearing these suits, prove my point. “My kid only wears it to qualify for all stars or in a close meet.”
This is a recreational league, allowance of expensive swimsuits that give an advantage to a swimmer is certainly unfair, even if it is within the rules.
You don’t think this same discrepancy between the haves / have nots are in every other sports? Come on. At the Olympic level there was just a story about a woman’s team that didn’t have cleats. It’s everywhere and in every sport.
And most people complaining about tech suits I’ve found, are peoples who’s kids have a half dozen of them, and just choose not to wear them at MCSL meets. These kids get beat at their meets and the parents are frustrated and blame it on the tech suit externality. In reality, the suits are more of a mindset. The kids who care wear them and kick the butt of the kids who aren’t locked in and choose not wear theirs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
All the posts justifying wearing these suits, prove my point. “My kid only wears it to qualify for all stars or in a close meet.”
This is a recreational league, allowance of expensive swimsuits that give an advantage to a swimmer is certainly unfair, even if it is within the rules.
You don’t think this same discrepancy between the haves / have nots are in every other sports? Come on. At the Olympic level there was just a story about a woman’s team that didn’t have cleats. It’s everywhere and in every sport.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
All the posts justifying wearing these suits, prove my point. “My kid only wears it to qualify for all stars or in a close meet.”
This is a recreational league, allowance of expensive swimsuits that give an advantage to a swimmer is certainly unfair, even if it is within the rules.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
I'm baffled by people that think club swimmers shouldn't be allowed in summer swim. Would there even be a league if you did this? Our team would lose about 1/3rd of swimmers/families. Good luck raising dues by 33% and requiring the remaining families to pick up the volunteer slots.
A large part of the motivation for my kids to swim club is so they can swim A meets in the summer.
Nowhere did I say club swimmers shouldn’t be allowed in summer swim. I just think one is being deliberately obtuse to not understand why people have a problem with kids wearing $600 swim suits that give them an edge on top of the fact those same kids are benefiting from the expensive year round training that others cannot afford.
Surely, you can understand that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
I'm baffled by people that think club swimmers shouldn't be allowed in summer swim. Would there even be a league if you did this? Our team would lose about 1/3rd of swimmers/families. Good luck raising dues by 33% and requiring the remaining families to pick up the volunteer slots.
A large part of the motivation for my kids to swim club is so they can swim A meets in the summer.
Nowhere did I say club swimmers shouldn’t be allowed in summer swim. I just think one is being deliberately obtuse to not understand why people have a problem with kids wearing $600 swim suits that give them an edge on top of the fact those same kids are benefiting from the expensive year round training that others cannot afford.
Surely, you can understand that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't understand the logic of Divisionals and All Stars being different from the rest.
Divisionals and All Stars should be the opportunity for kids who love summer swim to shine. Instead they seem to be opportunities for club swimmers who invest very little in summer swim to show off.
“Invest very little time in summer swim”? What is the basis for your statement? Our team club swimmers are highly involved in summer swim, leaving high, high level meet prelims sessions at championship LC meets to race back for a summer league meet, only to then race back for LC finals. Our club swimmers even ensure to travel back after out-of-state meets to be there for the A Meet. None of this is because they need individual summer league accolades. They come back to help the team. I don’t recall a pep rally or team outing where all our club swimmers did not attend, barring illness.
Come on. I know of no swimmers doing high, high level meet prelims, then a summer league meet, and then going back for finals that night at the high level meet. There are plenty of high level club swimmers that participate in and enjoy summer swim but none do the craziness that you just described.
Well, they do on our team and on the team we competed against on 7/15. And our swimmers who have been competing out of town have absolutely come back sooner than they probably would have to compete at our A Meet.
7/15 was a Monday, please name me the high level meet that had prelims on that day and the summer league team that had an important meet that day. I’ll wait because there were none. You don’t need to just make sh!t up to prove the point that elite swimmers enjoy summer swim. No elite swimmer is doing prelims at a high level club meet, then dashing across town to swim in a summer league meet, and then dashing back to the elite club meet to do finals. It’s just not happening.
PVS Champs, 7/13 — clearly the poster just had a typo. Ask teams in D1 and D2 if their swimmers did this. Because we saw it at our D1 meet with two 15-18 swimmers, one from each team. Better yet, check the roster for who swam PVS Champs and NVSL that day. Moreover, why do you care? The point is club kids DO care about their summer teams and, especially in D1, they even find ways to make club and summer league meets.
Anonymous wrote:At our meets this summer, it was mostly parents of opposing teams complaining about kids wearing tech suits. One guy in particular was a real whiner about it. Really his frustration is his kids didn’t come ready to race and got crushed. But he was blaming it on the suits. The suits helps some, but really they are a mindset thing. By wearing a suit you are saying I am here to swim fast. His kids were too lazy to swim fast.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t have a direct stake because my kids are all 12U.
That said, I am baffled by the willful ignorance and those being intentionally obtuse. People care for the same reason they care about the club swimmers coming in and dominating all the A meets. There are a lot of people across the metro area who cannot pay thousands for club swim or $600 for a suit that is only good for a few wears. Both the suit and access to club swim give kids a significant advantage over the traditional summer swim only kids whose family dues and swim team membership are several hundred dollars combined.
I'm baffled by people that think club swimmers shouldn't be allowed in summer swim. Would there even be a league if you did this? Our team would lose about 1/3rd of swimmers/families. Good luck raising dues by 33% and requiring the remaining families to pick up the volunteer slots.
A large part of the motivation for my kids to swim club is so they can swim A meets in the summer.