Anonymous wrote:
Pet peeve: Why do old people choose climbing walls as an example of something seemingly frivolous or extravagant? In terms of cost, space, and the number of students who utilize them, they're far superior to things like tennis/racquet/squash courts. And, none of you geezers ever complain about certain colleges owning their own golf courses, which are infinitely more decadent than a climbing wall. /end rant
Anonymous wrote:JMU the best
VCU not the best
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe Niche and Princeton Review have covered this topic ad nauseum.
Because, after all, colleges should be chosen mostly on food hall quality (with some consideration for climbing walls and lazy rivers).
No one here is doing that or even suggesting it.
Pet peeve: Why do old people choose climbing walls as an example of something seemingly frivolous or extravagant? In terms of cost, space, and the number of students who utilize them, they're far superior to things like tennis/racquet/squash courts. And, none of you geezers ever complain about certain colleges owning their own golf courses, which are infinitely more decadent than a climbing wall. /end rant
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe Niche and Princeton Review have covered this topic ad nauseum.
Because, after all, colleges should be chosen mostly on food hall quality (with some consideration for climbing walls and lazy rivers).
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech is known to have excellent food options and they're opening a new food hall this fall. Lots of love for Hokie dining options!
Anonymous wrote:I thought Univ. of Richmond was pretty good but we did hit it on parents weekend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe Niche and Princeton Review have covered this topic ad nauseum.
Because, after all, colleges should be chosen mostly on food hall quality (with some consideration for climbing walls and lazy rivers).
Anonymous wrote:Virginia Tech is known to have excellent food options and they're opening a new food hall this fall. Lots of love for Hokie dining options!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In general, those that run their own dining services tend to have better food. Those that contract dining services out to big corporate entities are not as good. Anecdotal observation, of course.
this is why I find Gladwell's evaluation so nuts. Bowdoin grows much of their own food, and they spend money on it, but mostly in the form of work-study back into students hands. vassar contracts it all out.
Anonymous wrote:I believe Niche and Princeton Review have covered this topic ad nauseum.