Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

So this is getting interesting. Word in the officiating circle is that the tattle team team ALSO had an illegal sub in the game but it wasnt caught until yesterday, so an official review is in process and will likely take that W away.

Anonymous wrote:Just to finish this off - we all agree that the team that used a player that wasn’t on their team, put him in a uniform with a different player’s name and then lied about it was definitely in the wrong - right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, I was at a game yesterday where, in the middle of the 6th inning, a parent calls the ump over claiming that a player on the other team is actually a year older than allowed. Ump questions the coach who refuses to answer.

So they declared the team ineligible and gave the win to the team that lady's kid plays on.

How she knew this I have no clue. But don't be that mom. These kids just want to play baseball.

Karen, sour grapes that your kid is the one called out for getting caught.

A 'Karen' would be the one crying about a roster substitution, not the person getting caught. If youre going to try and use contemporary slang, use it correctly. Or you look like a .... fool. Which we all now see you as.

I don’t think she looks like a fool. You seem mean. Maybe just relax and be nice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, I was at a game yesterday where, in the middle of the 6th inning, a parent calls the ump over claiming that a player on the other team is actually a year older than allowed. Ump questions the coach who refuses to answer.

So they declared the team ineligible and gave the win to the team that lady's kid plays on.

How she knew this I have no clue. But don't be that mom. These kids just want to play baseball.

Karen, sour grapes that your kid is the one called out for getting caught.

A 'Karen' would be the one crying about a roster substitution, not the person getting caught. If youre going to try and use contemporary slang, use it correctly. Or you look like a .... fool. Which we all now see you as.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, I was at a game yesterday where, in the middle of the 6th inning, a parent calls the ump over claiming that a player on the other team is actually a year older than allowed. Ump questions the coach who refuses to answer.

So they declared the team ineligible and gave the win to the team that lady's kid plays on.

How she knew this I have no clue. But don't be that mom. These kids just want to play baseball.

Karen, sour grapes that your kid is the one called out for getting caught.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP is a troll. This isn't how age appeals work.

1) Umpires don't deal with player eligibility.
2) Umpires don't talk to parents regarding any aspect of the game.
3) If age eligibility was properly questioned by a coach, it would be adjudicated by a league or tournament official. At tournaments, teams are required to have birth certificates on hand for all players on the roster.

Travel Ball Coach here. Agree.

This is a troll post.

Dad, here. No one cares that you're a 'travel ball' coach and no one cares that you sat on the bench at Gettysburg for two seasons in the late 90's. HTH.

Started every game in collegiate career and 3X All-Confrence Selection, actually.

You have a 5 inch weewee you say?

Anonymous wrote:So, I was at a game yesterday where, in the middle of the 6th inning, a parent calls the ump over claiming that a player on the other team is actually a year older than allowed. Ump questions the coach who refuses to answer.

So they declared the team ineligible and gave the win to the team that lady's kid plays on.

How she knew this I have no clue. But don't be that mom. These kids just want to play baseball.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My kid used to play in NWLL, which I know, I know... but before games one of the parents on our team used to come around with research on the other players, ranking their batters.. it was BIZARRE.

Like… for 12 year olds? That’s completely crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP is a troll. This isn't how age appeals work.

1) Umpires don't deal with player eligibility.
2) Umpires don't talk to parents regarding any aspect of the game.
3) If age eligibility was properly questioned by a coach, it would be adjudicated by a league or tournament official. At tournaments, teams are required to have birth certificates on hand for all players on the roster.

Travel Ball Coach here. Agree.

This is a troll post.

Dad, here. No one cares that you're a 'travel ball' coach and no one cares that you sat on the bench at Gettysburg for two seasons in the late 90's. HTH.

Started every game in collegiate career and 3X All-Confrence Selection, actually.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP is a troll. This isn't how age appeals work.

1) Umpires don't deal with player eligibility.
2) Umpires don't talk to parents regarding any aspect of the game.
3) If age eligibility was properly questioned by a coach, it would be adjudicated by a league or tournament official. At tournaments, teams are required to have birth certificates on hand for all players on the roster.

Travel Ball Coach here. Agree.

This is a troll post.

Dad, here. No one cares that you're a 'travel ball' coach and no one cares that you sat on the bench at Gettysburg for two seasons in the late 90's. HTH.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just so you have all the facts - the player in question was not ineligible because of his age, he was ineligible because he wasn’t actually on the team’s roster. He arrived late to the game and went on to the field wearing another player’s jersey. The parent the OP mentioned is a friend of the family of the player who was supposedly subbed in and knew he was at the beach with his family. She then told the coach of her son’s team, who spoke to a tournament official, who then questioned the opposing coach. The opposing coaching at first claimed the player entering the game was indeed the player listed on the roster and wearing the right jersey. However, there were multiple parents who knew both kids and the coach eventually “confessed” that the player who entered the game was not on the roster. The game was then stopped and the cheating team forfeited. Side note - the cheating team was losing 6-2 when the game was called.

So you are changing the facts of the story now. Definitely a troll.

+1 I think this isn't OP. I think this is the guy who fancies himself to be some important official because he had some fat DD play softball when he obviously doesn't even know the game. Five posts earlier he was claiming no such forfeiture wasnt even possible! So he made up a story to make himself seem right.

Sad.

What is wrong with you?

Honestly? A lot.

But, if PP's want to sling some sh*t, I'm not holding back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just so you have all the facts - the player in question was not ineligible because of his age, he was ineligible because he wasn’t actually on the team’s roster. He arrived late to the game and went on to the field wearing another player’s jersey. The parent the OP mentioned is a friend of the family of the player who was supposedly subbed in and knew he was at the beach with his family. She then told the coach of her son’s team, who spoke to a tournament official, who then questioned the opposing coach. The opposing coaching at first claimed the player entering the game was indeed the player listed on the roster and wearing the right jersey. However, there were multiple parents who knew both kids and the coach eventually “confessed” that the player who entered the game was not on the roster. The game was then stopped and the cheating team forfeited. Side note - the cheating team was losing 6-2 when the game was called.

So you are changing the facts of the story now. Definitely a troll.

+1 I think this isn't OP. I think this is the guy who fancies himself to be some important official because he had some fat DD play softball when he obviously doesn't even know the game. Five posts earlier he was claiming no such forfeiture wasnt even possible! So he made up a story to make himself seem right.

Sad.

What is wrong with you?