Anonymous wrote:So many of you guys are controlling and weird (screening for depression and thyroid, really?).
Anonymous wrote:I challenge all parents of teens to pick up their kids' phones and look at their usage data over the past 2 weeks. You might find interesting tends depending on amount of "downtime" available.
Anonymous wrote:Two weeks of extreme laziness sounds like a perfect summer break to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on dcum are really terrified of down time.
I think parents are not at all terrified of "downtime." I think parents are terrified of the consequences of letting their children stare at their phone screens for 9+ hours a day.
In many cases, that’s a consequence of not letting kids have downtime when they are young
No, it is not. Phones are addictive, especially to teens. (I say this as a high school teacher who has experience with hundreds of teens every year.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on dcum are really terrified of down time.
I think parents are not at all terrified of "downtime." I think parents are terrified of the consequences of letting their children stare at their phone screens for 9+ hours a day.
In many cases, that’s a consequence of not letting kids have downtime when they are young
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on dcum are really terrified of down time.
I think parents are not at all terrified of "downtime." I think parents are terrified of the consequences of letting their children stare at their phone screens for 9+ hours a day.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on dcum are really terrified of down time.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people on dcum are really terrified of down time.
Anonymous wrote:If they are reading until 2am and sleeping until noon I’d be like whatever. If they are on the internet or gaming I wouldn’t allow it. Screens off by 10pm