Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ And before you wail about the last sentence, above, note that there are *already* protections for just about every other religious group.
There are “Federal Task Force” already fighting bias against non-Christian religions?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf
OP here with some context. There are two significant departures from standard Republican positions on abortion and same-sex marriage, in response to Trump's requests that the language be softened to attract more voters.
"The Republican Party’s current policy platform, unchanged since 2016 after the party skipped the platform process during the pandemic in 2020, says the GOP supports a “human life amendment” to the U.S. Constitution. The proposed changes this year say that the 14th Amendment inherently offers protections for life at conception and that “states are, therefore, free to pass Laws protecting those Rights.” It represents a significant switch for the Republican Party, which has been grappling with how to handle its stance on abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, pitting social conservatives against figures more worried about the political implications of the party’s position.
On same-sex marriage, the Trump-aligned platform committee also approved changes opposed by social conservative in the party. The new proposed platform removes language that says marriage is 'between one man and one woman, and is the foundation for a free society'. It was replaced by language that says the party instead promotes a “culture that values the Sanctity of Marriage, the blessing of childhood, the foundational role of family, and supports working parents.” The new proposed platform does not include mention of 'one man and one woman'."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-pushes-new-gop-platform-softening-partys-positions-abortion-sex-rcna160730
I can get behind this.
Sure thats great for you. But why do you feel the need to make these national-level policies? This is the problem with Christian Nationalism. Its not about you or your beliefs, its about dominance and power and making others adhere to your beliefs which is hypocrisy at its finest because most Christians dont even follow their own rules.
DP. Where, in this platform, is "Christian Nationalism" mentioned or even alluded to?
Republicans Will Defend Religious Liberty We are the defenders of the First Amendment Right to Religious Liberty. It protects the Right not only to Worship according to the dictates of Conscience, but also to act in accordance with those Beliefs, not just in places of Worship, but in everyday life. Our ranks include men and women from every Faith and Tradition, and we respect the Right of every American to follow his or her deeply held Beliefs. To protect Religious Liberty, Republicans support a new Federal Task Force on Fighting Anti-Christian Bias that will investigate all forms of illegal discrimination, harassment, and persecution against Christians in America.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is good that Trump is moving the GOP to the left on abortion. The right should focus on advocating for their side having 3+ kids instead of putting so much energy into restricting abortions for the pro-choice folks.
Again for some of you in the back: There’s no “moving to the left” on abortion policy. The GOP’s interpretation is that the 14th Amendment protects embryos, and that’s a de jure and de facto ban on abortion, IVF, certain forms of contraception and who knows what else they can dream up.
Wrong. He clearly says he is leaving the abortion decision to the individual states, where it belongs. He also fully supports contraception. Do continue lying though. Now everyone can easily call you out on it.
Republicans Will Protect and Defend a Vote of the People, from within the States, on the Issue of Life We proudly stand for families and Life. We believe that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees that no person can be denied Life or Liberty without Due Process, and that the States are, therefore, free to pass Laws protecting those Rights. After 51 years, because of us, that power has been given to the States and to a vote of the People. We will oppose Late Term Abortion, while supporting mothers and policies that advance Prenatal Care, access to Birth Control, and IVF (fertility treatments.)
Anonymous wrote:^^ And before you wail about the last sentence, above, note that there are *already* protections for just about every other religious group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is good that Trump is moving the GOP to the left on abortion. The right should focus on advocating for their side having 3+ kids instead of putting so much energy into restricting abortions for the pro-choice folks.
Again for some of you in the back: There’s no “moving to the left” on abortion policy. The GOP’s interpretation is that the 14th Amendment protects embryos, and that’s a de jure and de facto ban on abortion, IVF, certain forms of contraception and who knows what else they can dream up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf
OP here with some context. There are two significant departures from standard Republican positions on abortion and same-sex marriage, in response to Trump's requests that the language be softened to attract more voters.
"The Republican Party’s current policy platform, unchanged since 2016 after the party skipped the platform process during the pandemic in 2020, says the GOP supports a “human life amendment” to the U.S. Constitution. The proposed changes this year say that the 14th Amendment inherently offers protections for life at conception and that “states are, therefore, free to pass Laws protecting those Rights.” It represents a significant switch for the Republican Party, which has been grappling with how to handle its stance on abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, pitting social conservatives against figures more worried about the political implications of the party’s position.
On same-sex marriage, the Trump-aligned platform committee also approved changes opposed by social conservative in the party. The new proposed platform removes language that says marriage is 'between one man and one woman, and is the foundation for a free society'. It was replaced by language that says the party instead promotes a “culture that values the Sanctity of Marriage, the blessing of childhood, the foundational role of family, and supports working parents.” The new proposed platform does not include mention of 'one man and one woman'."
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/trump-pushes-new-gop-platform-softening-partys-positions-abortion-sex-rcna160730
I can get behind this.
Sure thats great for you. But why do you feel the need to make these national-level policies? This is the problem with Christian Nationalism. Its not about you or your beliefs, its about dominance and power and making others adhere to your beliefs which is hypocrisy at its finest because most Christians dont even follow their own rules.
Anonymous wrote:Wait, what? Just an outright lie, but ok.
14. FIGHT FOR AND PROTECT SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE WITH NO CUTS, INCLUDING NO
CHANGES TO THE RETIREMENT AGE"
Anonymous wrote:They sure had to rush this out. I guess it was too apparent that Trump did whatever Heritage and the Federalists told Trump do and he would do the exact same thing again.
One does not create lists of extremists willing to come take over formerly non political jobs and just be horsing around hoping that the orange fascist listens.
Plus several points on this document show that it’s just a lie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just read the entire platform. With the exception of some of the wording and of course, the random capitalization, I agree with everything. I suggest everyone actually read it themselves rather than take the word of some of the lunatics here who make up nonsense that isn’t a part of this platform all.
Such as?
Anonymous wrote:I just read the entire platform. With the exception of some of the wording and of course, the random capitalization, I agree with everything. I suggest everyone actually read it themselves rather than take the word of some of the lunatics here who make up nonsense that isn’t a part of this platform all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So basically a bunch of generic mish-mosh that "both sides" can read as they want.
Sorry, Project2025 is the agenda. That is what the public needs to understand.
The neocon Bush-Heritage Foundation committed fraud by attaching Trump's name to their desired policies, many of those policies happen to be "Americans LAST".
81% of Project 25’s creators held formal roles in Trump’s presidency. Trump’s, not Bush’s.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/08/trump-project-2025?CMP=share_btn_url
Project 25 has serial traitors like Ken Cucinelli on its board. It's no ally to Trump and likely a hostile movement intended to harm him.
Hahahahahahahaha. That's why he appointed Ken Cuccinelli to his administration last time?
Trump apparently doesn’t know any of the people that were running his administration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
It's a fairly short read with lots of helpful CAPS and Capped Nouns.
https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2024/07/08/2024-gop-platform-july-7-final.pdf
Great, from now on, quote from this platform and NOT Project 2025.
No, they don't get to decide that we'll no longer pay attention to the 900 page policy platform instead of the two pager scrawled with crayons on some scrap paper
Use some d**n judgment
Clearly, you have no idea how utterly insane you sound. Do keep it up - you’re really winning people over.
DP
Anonymous wrote:I think Ivanka has been a positive influence on her dad. I’m betting she may have changed his mind on a few matters to a more sane and rational stance than the GOP extremists.