Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The same reason they get flu tests. To know what they are dealing with and how best to treat it.
The vast majority of people don't seek medical attention for suspected flu cases.
Yes they do.
Anonymous wrote:At-home tests don't create medical records.Anonymous wrote:1. Social responsibility- consideration for others
2. Option of paxlovid
3. Accurate medical records
Not that there's any benefit to keeping a formal record of infections. That's just weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Covid is lethal for some people, that's why. Even if it's not you, it could be a loved one or a stranger out there you'd infect.
But it would be Ok to infect them with something other than covid?
With a cold or the flu, years of epidemiology has shown that once you are 24 hours fever free and symptoms are improving, you are not contagious.
With covid, we know that is not exactly true (despite what the CDC states). So I prefer to test, know what we have, and if it's covid, I will avoid infecting others (even if I am feeling better, if I still test positive I know I'm contagious)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The same reason they get flu tests. To know what they are dealing with and how best to treat it.
The vast majority of people don't seek medical attention for suspected flu cases.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pre Vax I was very adament about social distancing, masking, testing etc. But in our current era, COVID is just an annoyance for most like a flu or cold or similar random viral infections.
Why do people still test if they are not an extreme risk population -- work and schools no longer require, new variants are so contagious that masking at home is theater.
Using up old tests? More people aiming for paxlovid?
I'm all about people staying home when sick, are we keeping people home even when well but testing pos
Because some of us understand science and recognize that getting covid 4, 5, and even more times is not healthy for us. Your risk of long covid greatly increases each time you get covid.
We also care about others, even those we might casually cross paths with. So if we are sick or contagious, we protect others
Anonymous wrote:The same reason they get flu tests. To know what they are dealing with and how best to treat it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just had it and tested. I wanted to take paxlovid if positive. I was quite ill and had strange, worrying symptoms (not cold symptoms). Knowing it was Covid I thought, ok--Covid is weird. But if I had been negative I would have wanted to seek medical care in case they were symptoms of Lyme disease or something like that.
As someone who is literally in bed right now knocked out with this variant of Covid, this. I tested to get paxlovid, and should be on my feet sooner back to working even if isolating. I get tested for strep or UTIs to determine if I need antibiotics—mentally, I see them the same way.
I don’t test unless I have an exposure or feel terrible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I probably won't go visit my elderly parents if I have Covid. I had it in the past and it presents like a really mild cold for me, so it's not obvious that it's COVID.
Is that a good enough reason for you, OP?
I could easily think of at least 10 different reasons why someone would want to test. Why can't you?
You might want to work on you post- pandemic anxiety and lack of empathy.
I agree. You seem to lack empathy and any ability to come up with reasons why people would want to test.
I’m not even sure how that is possible. I also don’t understand how you can’t fathom that COVID is a serious life-threatening issue for some people.
So are the flu and RSV.
It your covid test comes back negative, do you get a full workup for other potential infections?
I'm the original PP. I've never had a case of flu that I would mistake for a mild cold. I know I'm sick when I have the flu.
That's not the case for me with Covid. I’ve
only had a really mild, mild case. What is so hard for you to understand?
How would you know? You presumably weren't running to the doctor and demanding a flu test every time you had mild cold-like symptoms. The vast majority of influenza cases are not identified/confirmed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At-home tests don't create medical records.Anonymous wrote:1. Social responsibility- consideration for others
2. Option of paxlovid
3. Accurate medical records
Not that there's any benefit to keeping a formal record of infections. That's just weird.
So you message your doctor in the portal and tell them you have covid. Or you call. Quite simple. As someone with autoimmune issues, I prefer to keep my medical records up to date. Not that difficult to do.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand about contagious diseases but it is also a major impact to isolate yourself from your life for 5-10 days. This can ruin a vacation, a big event like a wedding, a school or work event, etc. If we go crazy with this and then have everyone who may have possibly come in contact with that person also isolate for 5-10 days it shuts down society again. I feel that those impacts are far greater than having a respiratory infection for a couple of days.
The way to avoid having society shutdown again is to know whether you have a highly communicable respiratory disease spread via aerosols and stay home/isolate. The way you know that is by testing.
Anonymous wrote:At-home tests don't create medical records.Anonymous wrote:1. Social responsibility- consideration for others
2. Option of paxlovid
3. Accurate medical records
Not that there's any benefit to keeping a formal record of infections. That's just weird.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The flu, food poisoning, and countless other ailments that are usually mild can be fatal for some people, but we don't test for them or require masks or isolation or other extreme measures. Covid still has the boogeyman effect for many people even though it's no more or less dangerous now than many other illnesses.
Yeah, staying home when you're sick is a good policy all around, but instead of that being The Way here, we have "it's just a cold" mentality as the norm.
Respect for others isn't 'murican, I guess.![]()
Also? Masks aren't an "extreme measure". Other cultures used them pre-pandemic for colds/flu, etc. when they needed to be out. It's only challenging for social-responsibility-challenged people/places.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The flu, food poisoning, and countless other ailments that are usually mild can be fatal for some people, but we don't test for them or require masks or isolation or other extreme measures. Covid still has the boogeyman effect for many people even though it's no more or less dangerous now than many other illnesses.
If I could test for norovirus vs. food poisoning if my kids have messy stomach issues, I definitely would, because that would impact how we manage treatment and isolation. If it's not contagious I'm not going to worry about spread. If it's highly contagious I'm going to be very careful about keeping the sick kid away from the others. Not sure why this is hard to understand.
Anonymous wrote:The flu, food poisoning, and countless other ailments that are usually mild can be fatal for some people, but we don't test for them or require masks or isolation or other extreme measures. Covid still has the boogeyman effect for many people even though it's no more or less dangerous now than many other illnesses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Covid is lethal for some people, that's why. Even if it's not you, it could be a loved one or a stranger out there you'd infect.
But it would be Ok to infect them with something other than covid?