Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Antisemitism and anti Zionism never pays.
More like we’re not completely out of the time where $$$ can buy elections to serve a foreign power, especially a fascist ethnostate committing genocide AND trying to start WW3.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: They are grifters because they aren’t serious about governance but they love the paycheck and clout.
Maybe they aren’t as destructive as MAGA, but they aren’t great. They aren’t smart and they aren’t productive.
The democrats have a deep bench of serious, smart, and talented people.
They aren’t on that list.
Bowman lost because American Jews, in large abundance in his district, voted for the interests of a foreign country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: They are grifters because they aren’t serious about governance but they love the paycheck and clout.
Maybe they aren’t as destructive as MAGA, but they aren’t great. They aren’t smart and they aren’t productive.
The democrats have a deep bench of serious, smart, and talented people.
They aren’t on that list.
Bowman lost because American Jews, in large abundance in his district, voted for the interests of a foreign country.
Anonymous wrote:Get ready for a red wave and Make America Great Again. Don’t fight it, embrace it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Get ready for a red wave and Make America Great Again. Don’t fight it, embrace it.
No. Bowman ran a horrible campaign. He had a lot of problems, not just the antisemitism. He was elected to pass legislation that helped people. Voting NO because a bill doesn’t go far enough is BS. That’s not how policy is made. I consider myself to be very progressive and like pragmatic legislatures, not show horses. Or maybe I should say Horseshow politicians. It doesn’t matter HOW he came to his decisions, it’s that he VOTED for the same outcome as MAGA.
Good riddance.
Anonymous wrote:Antisemitism and anti Zionism never pays.
Anonymous wrote: They are grifters because they aren’t serious about governance but they love the paycheck and clout.
Maybe they aren’t as destructive as MAGA, but they aren’t great. They aren’t smart and they aren’t productive.
The democrats have a deep bench of serious, smart, and talented people.
They aren’t on that list.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Following with interest. According to one poll, Westchester executive George Latimer has a 17 point lead over incumbent Congressman Jamaal Bowman.
https://forward.com/fast-forward/599701/jamaal-bowman-george-latimer-poll-gaza/
Yeah I’ve talked about this in the 2024 House thread, my sister lives in this district. I predict he and Cori Bush are both going to lose their primaries.
I consider myself progressive and I’m hoping he and Cori lose. I would have liked to see Talib gone. I think AOC has a good approach to making progress. She’s not a burn it all
Down or “it’s a revolution”
Sanders approach.
You are most definitely NOT a progressive. The appropriate label for you is centrist. You would be more likely vote for Nikki Haley than a member of the squad if they ran for President.
Oh please! Nikki who carries water for Trump? I was a Warren fan. AOC is a pragmatist, she understands how to make progress and picks her battles carefully. Sanders is all bluster and makes horrible personnel choices.
Np- absolutely. I think Bush, Bowman and some of the other “squad” members are grifters. The left’s version is the MAGA grift.
Anonymous wrote:Get ready for a red wave and Make America Great Again. Don’t fight it, embrace it.