Anonymous wrote:Yes - current player on one of the lower teams. With pre-academy forming, we had anticipated at least one level higher, and, instead, this seems to be a demotion.
Anonymous wrote:For 2014B, any idea if there was an influx of outside players? We were disappointed with our son's placement and the lack of communication from ASA.
Anonymous wrote:2015 B Arlington Silver (lowest team) or DCSC red 2nd dc team but equivalent to blue black for Arlington? Any advice?
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know where they are in 2015 G offers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:U9s try out first and get offers early. Returning u10+ and below top team havent been sent by my estimate
Starting to wonder if it’s possible they miss the 5/22 deadline if they haven’t even gotten second team offers out yet…
As of yesterday they are still evaluating at least some second team players.
What were you basing that on?
New—but not outside new—players practicing with or guesting with top teams.
What age group?
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know where they are in 2015 G offers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As PP said, ARL has to deal with a significant increase in players from McLean trying out this year, making it much more difficult and more volatile than prior years. It’s going to take a little time to settle the top 2-3 teams, but they are working on it. The teams should be more competitive if they get it right, so the club is trying to be very deliberate in how they approach this year’s team make-ups.
Have Arl staff ghosted you too? No responses to our emails with simple questions.
Teams should add talent when available, no argument here. Whether that talent comes from external or internally.
But, ARL should be taking care of the talent that it has cultivated and family relationships they have developed and they have not accomplished that during this time period. The severe brush-off many ARL parents and kids are getting from the ARL club is bad optics and bad for morale.
Whatever is happening with McLean is not really ARL's "problem." ARL is already doing things the right way, as in, they are not the ones who lost an ECNL club or are having problems internally. Now, ARL is letting McLean's issues affect their club.
Anonymous wrote:As PP said, ARL has to deal with a significant increase in players from McLean trying out this year, making it much more difficult and more volatile than prior years. It’s going to take a little time to settle the top 2-3 teams, but they are working on it. The teams should be more competitive if they get it right, so the club is trying to be very deliberate in how they approach this year’s team make-ups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As PP said, ARL has to deal with a significant increase in players from McLean trying out this year, making it much more difficult and more volatile than prior years. It’s going to take a little time to settle the top 2-3 teams, but they are working on it. The teams should be more competitive if they get it right, so the club is trying to be very deliberate in how they approach this year’s team make-ups.
Thanks Gerardo/Alex/Khaled et al lol
What is that supposed to mean?