Anonymous wrote:I agree- but more importantly, I think partial hysterectomies should be on demand. No need to keep bleeding once you choose you’re done having kids or not having kids, saves money saves hassle and reduces your chances of uterine or cervical cancer to zero without putting the recipient through menopause? Magic.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t know any practice in the D.C area that doesn’t offer elective cesarean. Where are you posting from?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe anyone would opt for a c-section if it wasn't necessary. Cutting through several layers, including muscle, to deliver the baby. The recovery is difficult and painful.
My mom had to have major reconstructive surgery as a result of her vaginal births so she ended up getting cut open anyway. My c sections were all easy and uncomplicated and I don't have prolapse and pelvic floor issues and won't need to have my bladder reconstructed.
Pelvic floor and bladder issues are related to pregnancy. Not simply birth method. I’d advise you to keep this in mind closer to menopause as your family may be predisposed to them. I’m sorry your mother suffered and hope you do not. 💗
Sharing more for others, in case they are struggling and had c section.
Anonymous wrote:I recommend going doctor shopping, OP. Those that will give you the C-section you want will probably be more likely to actually listen to your preferences in other dimensions. I've no experience but other posters say such doctors exist.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't believe anyone would opt for a c-section if it wasn't necessary. Cutting through several layers, including muscle, to deliver the baby. The recovery is difficult and painful.
My mom had to have major reconstructive surgery as a result of her vaginal births so she ended up getting cut open anyway. My c sections were all easy and uncomplicated and I don't have prolapse and pelvic floor issues and won't need to have my bladder reconstructed.
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe anyone would opt for a c-section if it wasn't necessary. Cutting through several layers, including muscle, to deliver the baby. The recovery is difficult and painful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This article explains in great detail how common maternal birth injuries are and the impact on women. Should be required reading for every expectant mom so she’s aware of what’s at stake in the delivery room and can make an informed decision about her delivery type. https://www.nzdoctor.co.nz/educate/MBI
Also, I had a maternal request C section and had no issues with insurance covering it. It was only a touch more expensive than my vaginal birth was, and cheaper in total compared with the years of physical therapy and urogynecologist consults and trauma therapy from my bad vaginal birth. That one bad birth injured me and still cost me over 15K out of pocket for treatment over a number of years. I still need pelvic floor reconstruction which will likely cost 50-100K. So the C section was far cheaper, when considering big picture costs.
My OB said it’s fear mongering that insurance won’t pay for a maternal choice C section. He laughed at me when I asked if they would
Cover it and told me that he’s never had an issue with insurance paying for one. He’s been in practice for over 25 years and said it’s a bunch of NCB fear mongering.
This article was….so eye-opening. The prevalence of some of these conditions that have no good treatment options/can’t be fixed with surgery and leave women with lifelong pain, incontinence, sexual dysfunction, etc. - just wow. Levator ani avulsion 15-25% of vaginal births?? Prolapse up to 50%? Holy shit. When I had my (unplanned) C-section, I was warned about possible complications and how common they were and had to sign a consent form. Literally no one told me about any kind of natural birth injury. It was on me to seek out that information on my own, and of course it wasn’t easy to find reliable data.
Anonymous wrote:This article explains in great detail how common maternal birth injuries are and the impact on women. Should be required reading for every expectant mom so she’s aware of what’s at stake in the delivery room and can make an informed decision about her delivery type. https://www.nzdoctor.co.nz/educate/MBI
Also, I had a maternal request C section and had no issues with insurance covering it. It was only a touch more expensive than my vaginal birth was, and cheaper in total compared with the years of physical therapy and urogynecologist consults and trauma therapy from my bad vaginal birth. That one bad birth injured me and still cost me over 15K out of pocket for treatment over a number of years. I still need pelvic floor reconstruction which will likely cost 50-100K. So the C section was far cheaper, when considering big picture costs.
My OB said it’s fear mongering that insurance won’t pay for a maternal choice C section. He laughed at me when I asked if they would
Cover it and told me that he’s never had an issue with insurance paying for one. He’s been in practice for over 25 years and said it’s a bunch of NCB fear mongering.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone has a different story - I had 2 unmedicated vaginally births, and zero issues as far as serious tearing or incontinence, etc
Can women support each other's choices and not argue over which is best? It's a matter of what is best for each person amd what is best for you might not be best for me and vice versa