Anonymous wrote:You know what? If you go it'll be a pain and also underappreciated by everyone - but you should go if you can make it work. It's these little things that you do, even when you don't want to, that accumulate into a solid relationship. I think.
Anonymous wrote:It depends on the closeness of relationship.
Anonymous wrote:You sound like you do not have children. If so, there is a decent chance that in forty years, your nephew might be one of the few left who feels obligated to you and is still young enough to have energy to help. Given that, make the trip.
You sound like you do not have children
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You seem all about you. I’m sure you won’t be missed.
THIS. In my family not going would be unacceptable. We are close and strongly value education. Showing up sends a message to the graduate and younger children that we are proud and this accomplishment is a big deal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You seem all about you. I’m sure you won’t be missed.
THIS. In my family not going would be unacceptable. We are close and strongly value education. Showing up sends a message to the graduate and younger children that we are proud and this accomplishment is a big deal.
What you describe is unacceptable.
The matter is between the graduate and the invitees. Based on the family dynamic you describe - a dynamic you endorse - if the graduate decides the Aunt's presence is optional, the Aunt would still be required to attend because You are making it a requirement. It's not about the graduate; it's about messages You have decided need to be sent to people who aren't You.
You are also deciding how other people receive messages: "Showing up sends a message to the graduate and younger children that we are proud and this accomplishment is a big deal."
Is that the case? Is it possible everyone having to attend graduations - declining is "unacceptable" - is received as the family being overbearing, or perhaps insufferable?
Either way, you don't get to decide how other people receive messages and then use this as a predicate to decide how relatives relate to each other. The matter is between the graduate and the invitees.
She literally started her response with “In my family”…chill
PP: "You [OP] seem all about you. I’m sure you won’t be missed."
"THIS..."
…chill
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You seem all about you. I’m sure you won’t be missed.
THIS. In my family not going would be unacceptable. We are close and strongly value education. Showing up sends a message to the graduate and younger children that we are proud and this accomplishment is a big deal.
What you describe is unacceptable.
The matter is between the graduate and the invitees. Based on the family dynamic you describe - a dynamic you endorse - if the graduate decides the Aunt's presence is optional, the Aunt would still be required to attend because You are making it a requirement. It's not about the graduate; it's about messages You have decided need to be sent to people who aren't You.
You are also deciding how other people receive messages: "Showing up sends a message to the graduate and younger children that we are proud and this accomplishment is a big deal."
Is that the case? Is it possible everyone having to attend graduations - declining is "unacceptable" - is received as the family being overbearing, or perhaps insufferable?
Either way, you don't get to decide how other people receive messages and then use this as a predicate to decide how relatives relate to each other. The matter is between the graduate and the invitees.