Anonymous wrote:I guess I also have an aversion to overly trendy things like Stanley cups. Once something reaches that level of popularity (and OC shoes are there), I avoid like the plague.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think the fact that fewer people wear Nikes makes them more fashionable. I'm on the hunt for a pair right now.
It isn't like they're hard to find.
It's a ghetto shoe, though.
Using that word is far more déclassé than any shoe.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think the fact that fewer people wear Nikes makes them more fashionable. I'm on the hunt for a pair right now.
It isn't like they're hard to find.
It's a ghetto shoe, though.
Anonymous wrote:I actually think the fact that fewer people wear Nikes makes them more fashionable. I'm on the hunt for a pair right now.
Anonymous wrote:I see tons of Nike Metcons amongst women who actually work out!
Anonymous wrote:Hokas are for middle aged women with messed up feet
Ons seem cool for most 30 something wealthy women
Nike Metcon are for serious gym goers.
At my gym (wealthy area and mix of ages) I see mainly Nike, ons and a few new balance.
No one is wearing Nike clothing though - I think that is why the share price is tanking. It is such bad quality and lacks style. Most are wearing Lululemon
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am an actual runner (20+ miles each week) and I've worn Nike Pegasus and Vomero for 20 years, because they fit my feet best.
I bought a pair of Hokas a couple of years ago because everyone raved about the cushioning. They were great for maybe 6-8 months, then the cushioning really wore out. My Nikes last far longer (for more miles).
I think Hokas and OC sneakers are trendy, and for people who are using them primarily for running errands, going to fitness classes, short runs, any shoe is just fine. But all the serious runners I know wear shoes that fit their feet best, and honestly it's still mostly Brooks and ASICS.
6-8 months with 20+ miles a week? You’re wearing your running shoes wayyyyy beyond their lifecycle.
Anonymous wrote:Vejas are way overrated, and overpriced for fake leather. They aren't even good looking. OP for running, you need to wear whatever shoe is best for your feet, thats not about fashion. For a fun everyday sneaker get whatever speaks to you,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am an actual runner (20+ miles each week) and I've worn Nike Pegasus and Vomero for 20 years, because they fit my feet best.
I bought a pair of Hokas a couple of years ago because everyone raved about the cushioning. They were great for maybe 6-8 months, then the cushioning really wore out. My Nikes last far longer (for more miles).
I think Hokas and OC sneakers are trendy, and for people who are using them primarily for running errands, going to fitness classes, short runs, any shoe is just fine. But all the serious runners I know wear shoes that fit their feet best, and honestly it's still mostly Brooks and ASICS.
6-8 months with 20+ miles a week? You’re wearing your running shoes wayyyyy beyond their lifecycle.
Anonymous wrote:Hokas are for middle aged women with messed up feet
Ons seem cool for most 30 something wealthy women
Nike Metcon are for serious gym goers.
At my gym (wealthy area and mix of ages) I see mainly Nike, ons and a few new balance.
No one is wearing Nike clothing though - I think that is why the share price is tanking. It is such bad quality and lacks style. Most are wearing Lululemon