Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only if I were rich enough not to feel it, and only if my child were accepted to one of a handful of top private schools in the DMV.
That is, I think GDS or SFS are probably better than the education my child is getting in an MCPS magnet, but not by enough to sacrifice college tuition or retirement.
Most other privates, though? No, I think my kids are better served in MCPS.
The achievements of students in programs like Blair's SMCS are so much higher than privates like GDS or Sidwell that I can't see the value.
DP but are we only looking at this in terms of achievements? My kids attend MCPS, but I definitely envy private education for what I perceive as the superior training in writing and public speaking.
I don't think you have kids in MCPS.
Even in areas where you would think that private schools are better i.e. writing and public speaking, MCPS schools dominate these competitions, C-Span for example.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
MCPS magnet high schools are really good, but you have to hold your nose and deal with the mediocrity, lack of enrichment or challenging work, etc. until then.
My MCPS kid was in magnet all but 2 years from K-12. You just need to know your options.
Good for you but my post didn’t say that there are no magnet options in early years. I know my options, thank you. Magnet high schools are good. The rest - CES, MS magnets, etc. are mediocre at best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only if I were rich enough not to feel it, and only if my child were accepted to one of a handful of top private schools in the DMV.
That is, I think GDS or SFS are probably better than the education my child is getting in an MCPS magnet, but not by enough to sacrifice college tuition or retirement.
Most other privates, though? No, I think my kids are better served in MCPS.
The achievements of students in programs like Blair's SMCS are so much higher than privates like GDS or Sidwell that I can't see the value.
DP but are we only looking at this in terms of achievements? My kids attend MCPS, but I definitely envy private education for what I perceive as the superior training in writing and public speaking.
Anonymous wrote:Only if I were rich enough not to feel it, and only if my child were accepted to one of a handful of top private schools in the DMV.
That is, I think GDS or SFS are probably better than the education my child is getting in an MCPS magnet, but not by enough to sacrifice college tuition or retirement.
Most other privates, though? No, I think my kids are better served in MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
Not many privates have to teach kids how to hold a book or a pencil, what an elephant is, or how to speak English. Privates absolutely have the advantage here. Schools can move on and focus on teaching writing, spelling, foreign language, etc. in the young ages because they have a well supported student body.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
Anonymous wrote:Do private schools teach kids how to write well? That is my biggest gripe with MCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Depends what you need. For the sciences, the publics are better than most privates. For special needs and kids who need a smaller classroom environment, private school would likely be more nurturing than MCPS. But beware of the restrictions many private schools have...needing to have As to take AP classes which knocks out perfectly decent B+ kids and restrictions on where and how many colleges a kid can apply to. I wouldn't pay a ton of money to have a school restrict my kids' choices.
Private better for sciences.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
MCPS magnet high schools are really good, but you have to hold your nose and deal with the mediocrity, lack of enrichment or challenging work, etc. until then.
My MCPS kid was in magnet all but 2 years from K-12. You just need to know your options.
What are these magnet options you speak of, before middle school? CES? Not til 4th grade. Immersion? Lottery. Am I missing something else?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
MCPS magnet high schools are really good, but you have to hold your nose and deal with the mediocrity, lack of enrichment or challenging work, etc. until then.
My MCPS kid was in magnet all but 2 years from K-12. You just need to know your options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
MCPS magnet high schools are really good, but you have to hold your nose and deal with the mediocrity, lack of enrichment or challenging work, etc. until then.
My MCPS kid was in magnet all but 2 years from K-12. You just need to know your options.
Good for you but my post didn’t say that there are no magnet options in early years. I know my options, thank you. Magnet high schools are good. The rest - CES, MS magnets, etc. are mediocre at best.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're just finishing out K in Mcps in a "top ranked" school. We applied to and committed to a private for next year for 1st.
Dd needed smaller classes, more enrichment, and like many pps stated, a push to "do her best" that private will offer.
I wasn't impressed by anything in Mcps - teachers, admin, facilities, peer group, curriculum. I could go on.
Omg it’s kindergarten
Agree. Kids don’t learn much vastly different K-3 in public or private because you have to ensure the base level foundation for all kids. People are often surprised to discover this later on.
MCPS magnet high schools are really good, but you have to hold your nose and deal with the mediocrity, lack of enrichment or challenging work, etc. until then.
My MCPS kid was in magnet all but 2 years from K-12. You just need to know your options.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Only if I were rich enough not to feel it, and only if my child were accepted to one of a handful of top private schools in the DMV.
That is, I think GDS or SFS are probably better than the education my child is getting in an MCPS magnet, but not by enough to sacrifice college tuition or retirement.
Most other privates, though? No, I think my kids are better served in MCPS.
The achievements of students in programs like Blair's SMCS are so much higher than privates like GDS or Sidwell that I can't see the value.