Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I expect that schools that remain TO will see increasing application numbers, particularly those that are already perceived as being exclusive.
This will be interesting. The T10s that reinstated tests will have application numbers go down because the dummies will no longer apply to them and the TOS will get even more applicants. I’m guessing USNWR will change rankings because no way the Ivies ate going to tolerate TOs falsely moving up in this numbers game.
And your post, with the stupid gaming of the rankings and colleges' influence, is why this entire thing is such a sham.
+1000
Do wish the apps could add a few Qs:
1) How much did you pay for college consulting and test prep?
2) How much did you pay for club/travel sports?
3) Describe any ways that you compromised your integrity to get your GPA? (I have so much to say about this….but not the right thread)
4) Did your parents force you to stay in an activity, sport, or club (or develop your own nonprofit/club/fill-in-the-blank) even though you derived no joy or sense of your own agency in said endeavor?
Major problems, DCUM. TBH I’m not sure I want my kid competing for a “top” spot. I am concerned about the peer group. 😳
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC may be harder for OOS, but it’s not quite as hard for those in-state, despite being private.
Agree with others.
All of my Cali friends say the opposite!
Then they would be wrong, USC takes a huge portion of the class from instate
Californians tend to apply closer to home and at least lately have really shifted to computer science , mechanical engineering , or neuroscience as preferred majors. While USC and the UC schools may enroll far more instate, the number and caliber of instate applicants is really high.
Flip side is that many of the east coast SLACs are slightly easier for Californians to get into as less are applying there.
Anonymous wrote:Case Western Reserve University. Supposedly my kid’s safety but she was deferred and now waitlisted with 4.3/1550.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Michigan got 105K apps this year-all time record. Crazy hard admit!
They have approximately 32,000 undergraduates.
UVA has approximately 16,000 undergraduates and received about 57,000 applications.
So proportionally the same kind of crazy, hard admit.
Yeah. That Michigan booster has a problem with math/statistics.
Anonymous wrote:Case Western Reserve University. Supposedly my kid’s safety but she was deferred and now waitlisted with 4.3/1550.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC may be harder for OOS, but it’s not quite as hard for those in-state, despite being private.
Agree with others.
All of my Cali friends say the opposite!
Then they would be wrong, USC takes a huge portion of the class from instate
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC may be harder for OOS, but it’s not quite as hard for those in-state, despite being private.
Agree with others.
All of my Cali friends say the opposite!
Then they would be wrong, USC takes a huge portion of the class from instate
Anonymous wrote:UMiami
Anonymous wrote:Outside of the top 25-30 which have always been tough, all the OOS publics, especially in the south, have gotten tougher.
Clemson, Auburn, Bama, tennessee, South Carolina, Indiana , Pitt.
Also you may get in but you may not get as much merit as you did even 2-3 years ago.
VT and Jmu too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Michigan got 105K apps this year-all time record. Crazy hard admit!
They have approximately 32,000 undergraduates.
UVA has approximately 16,000 undergraduates and received about 57,000 applications.
So proportionally the same kind of crazy, hard admit.
Anonymous wrote:What is everyone basing this on? Actual statistics or just the fact that your kid didn’t get in and thought they would? I imagine if you asked this question every year, a lot of the same schools would come up in the replies. Everyone whose kids are applying for the first time thinks it’s harder for their kids than it was in years past. Maybe they’re right in some cases but it seems like a biased approach.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:USC may be harder for OOS, but it’s not quite as hard for those in-state, despite being private.
Agree with others.
All of my Cali friends say the opposite!