Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you're right and the school's wrong, you should be educating your child well enough that they'll understand the school's wrong when they hear it. It will be a good exercise in critical thinking skills and media literacy, to qnalyze the school's incorrect presentation ad understand its flaws.
Ahh yes, so many 7th graders are encouraged at school to disagree with an authority figure on a politicized topic such as gender ideology.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is very advanced and accelerated in at home enrichment. Can my child get high school credit for taking 9th grade Family Life in 7th grade?
Only if they went to WPES first.
Anonymous wrote:If you're right and the school's wrong, you should be educating your child well enough that they'll understand the school's wrong when they hear it. It will be a good exercise in critical thinking skills and media literacy, to qnalyze the school's incorrect presentation ad understand its flaws.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most opt-out folks know that their kids will hear about it from their peers. This isn't up for debate.
What opt-out folks are saying is that they would rather be the authority on the subject vs a middle school teacher.
Seems reasonable.
Seems like parents who feel insecure about their authority and are worried that their kids will believe a middle-school teacher instead of them.
That could be a reason as well.
If you know that you may not agree with the content and just have to correct or provide some nuance to the conversation, why invite that unnecessary conflict.
"Unnecessary conflict" suggests you're worried the kids will believe the teacher instead of you.
Well yeah. Opting out is a great opportunity to avoid that. It's great we have that option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most opt-out folks know that their kids will hear about it from their peers. This isn't up for debate.
What opt-out folks are saying is that they would rather be the authority on the subject vs a middle school teacher.
Seems reasonable.
Seems like parents who feel insecure about their authority and are worried that their kids will believe a middle-school teacher instead of them.
That could be a reason as well.
If you know that you may not agree with the content and just have to correct or provide some nuance to the conversation, why invite that unnecessary conflict.
"Unnecessary conflict" suggests you're worried the kids will believe the teacher instead of you.
Facts like what a woman is?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most opt-out folks know that their kids will hear about it from their peers. This isn't up for debate.
What opt-out folks are saying is that they would rather be the authority on the subject vs a middle school teacher.
Seems reasonable.
seems unreasonable - scientific facts vs religious kooks
I would agree with you if they stuck to the facts but they are introducing gender ideology which is on par with a religion.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Would you opt your child out of the Family Life and Human Sexuality unit offered at middle school? Just received an opt-out form from the school...
I wish they wouldn't allow opt-out. Even middle school kids need to be informed. It's just to important to allow rampant ignorance.
Anonymous wrote:DP, trying to thread the needle.
I am not, in this instance, terribly concerned about someone outside the family but in a position of teaching authority being a provider of information of that nature for my children. I did review the parent-facing information, and I discussed the matter with parents of older children who had taken the class to be comfortable with that.
However, I would not want to impose on others by assuming their own comfort with such at their school or with a particular teacher with whom they may not have the familiarity to be comfortable. In a case where a family would not want that third party to be imparting such information (for whatever reason), does MCPS make available the teaching curriculum so that a parent/guardian might be that non-peer provider, not leaving a student ignorant among their peers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most opt-out folks know that their kids will hear about it from their peers. This isn't up for debate.
What opt-out folks are saying is that they would rather be the authority on the subject vs a middle school teacher.
Seems reasonable.
Seems like parents who feel insecure about their authority and are worried that their kids will believe a middle-school teacher instead of them.
That could be a reason as well.
If you know that you may not agree with the content and just have to correct or provide some nuance to the conversation, why invite that unnecessary conflict.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most opt-out folks know that their kids will hear about it from their peers. This isn't up for debate.
What opt-out folks are saying is that they would rather be the authority on the subject vs a middle school teacher.
Seems reasonable.
seems unreasonable - scientific facts vs religious kooks
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most opt-out folks know that their kids will hear about it from their peers. This isn't up for debate.
What opt-out folks are saying is that they would rather be the authority on the subject vs a middle school teacher.
Seems reasonable.
Seems like parents who feel insecure about their authority and are worried that their kids will believe a middle-school teacher instead of them.