Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Right, the millennia of men killing, raping, and torturing women is just imaginary or something. 🙄🙄

What does that have to do with seeing a nude person?

So do you not think flashing someone is a crime?

The difference is intent.

How is a woman supposed to discern the magical internal feelings of a flasher that make flashing her okay and safe? I realize you believe these magical feelings of the flasher matter more than any woman’s safety, but as a practical matter as a woman, how am I supposed to know what the flasher’s intent is so I know it’s totally safe for me to be flashed?

I was 13 when I was flashed for the first time. I need practical tips here to share with my teen girls so they know when they should welcome men flashing them. TIA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Right, the millennia of men killing, raping, and torturing women is just imaginary or something. 🙄🙄

What does that have to do with seeing a nude person?

So do you not think flashing someone is a crime?

The PP you are responding to is a frequent DCUM commenter and is deranged. Believes that women should have absolutely no problem with any man who wants to walk into any women’s locker room or bathroom naked, especially fully erect. They’ve talked before on DCUM about how female children should not be concerned about naked adult men in their changing rooms and locker rooms. I think that PP may actually be a fetishist who is working to destroy boundaries so he can exercise his fetish.

The days of caring about males are in female spaces are done. Prudes need to get over it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Right, the millennia of men killing, raping, and torturing women is just imaginary or something. 🙄🙄

What does that have to do with seeing a nude person?

So do you not think flashing someone is a crime?

The difference is intent.

The locker room at our pool has a 6 and under rule for opposite sex children.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This would not bother me in the least.

Based on these types of comments, I don’t think most of you have tween and teen daughters. An 11 year old boy should not be in their locker room.

I have twin boy/girl 11yo. I know many of both and it wouldn't bother me save a couple who have always been off. On the other hand, I say I would not mind if someone else did that, my son would not be comfortable going into a women's restroom. He has refused for years so I would not ever ask him to do so.

Many years ago before I had kids I made an assumption about a kid being too old for something and felt so bad when I later discovered they were just the right age but looked older as the child of very tall parents. It's possible that boy is younger than you think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Thanks for proving our point. Women and girls need to recenter their trauma and tamp down eons of evolution teaching us how to avoid harm.

The grown woman pp who refuses to go to a pool because some random 11 year old boy with his mother could be a threat?

What is so scary about the mens room that the 11 yo can't be in there? Is he scared of grown man bodies? Where did he learn that?

Why don’t you ask his mom? Or just myob.

Why don't your read the OP and get back to us.

I think bathroom is totally fine, as everything is done behind a locked door. A changing room is trickier…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Right, the millennia of men killing, raping, and torturing women is just imaginary or something. 🙄🙄

What does that have to do with seeing a nude person?

So do you not think flashing someone is a crime?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Thanks for proving our point. Women and girls need to recenter their trauma and tamp down eons of evolution teaching us how to avoid harm.

The grown woman pp who refuses to go to a pool because some random 11 year old boy with his mother could be a threat?

What is so scary about the mens room that the 11 yo can't be in there? Is he scared of grown man bodies? Where did he learn that?

Why don’t you ask his mom? Or just myob.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Right, the millennia of men killing, raping, and torturing women is just imaginary or something. 🙄🙄

What does that have to do with seeing a nude person?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Right, the millennia of men killing, raping, and torturing women is just imaginary or something. 🙄🙄

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Thanks for proving our point. Women and girls need to recenter their trauma and tamp down eons of evolution teaching us how to avoid harm.

The grown woman pp who refuses to go to a pool because some random 11 year old boy with his mother could be a threat?

What is so scary about the mens room that the 11 yo can't be in there? Is he scared of grown man bodies? Where did he learn that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Thanks for proving our point. Women and girls need to recenter their trauma and tamp down eons of evolution teaching us how to avoid harm.

The grown woman pp who refuses to go to a pool because some random 11 year old boy with his mother could be a threat?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think young kids should be in a locker room alone.

Just google locker room assaults.

https://wjla.com/news/local/woman-alleges-rape-assault-inside-wilson-aquatic-center-locker-room-97400

These are not young kids.

When your 11 yr old is raped in a locker room, lets so how old you think they are.

Well, I hope you’re fine with your 11 year old seeing bare breasts and crotches, then. Because I’m not covering up just because he’s there. You can’t have it both ways.

Not to mention the younger girls in the locker room who don’t want to be naked in front of a male peer. What about their comfort? And their right to not be ogled and not have to see a peer’s penis. Not much different from subway flashers.

It has been well established that girls are not allowed to complain about their feelings of privacy or unease about having males naked with them.

Yes, the feelings of the flasher who wants to force trapped women and girls to see his penis matter much more than the dumb feelings of any girls who might be scared of such a man. We have all been taught that lesson.

Actually nudity is not inherently threatening and so if anyone is “afraid” of a penis or breast they were taught to be so by their parents. If parents are so worried about scared kids then maybe they shouldn’t teach them to be scared of the human body.

Thanks for proving our point. Women and girls need to recenter their trauma and tamp down eons of evolution teaching us how to avoid harm.

“Eons of evolution” never taught anyone to fear the human body or else all human societies would promote the same body shaming as religious puritans do but that is clearly not reality. A predator is still a predator even when wearing clothes.