Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Instacart drivers are not allowed to carry firearms per their rules.
I believe he has been suspended not fired while the investigation continues.
But not for shopping under someone else's accout?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Instacart drivers are not allowed to carry firearms per their rules.
I believe he has been suspended not fired while the investigation continues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think anyone who shoots a little dog not actually physically on them rather than just go back to their car is deranged and is going to shoot someone eventually. The man was delivering illegally, carrying a loaded weapon to people's homes? Noooo. I keep my dog inside but there is one person more in the wrong here, and that's trigger-happy weirdo.
Finally a sensible person.
Yes, I think people should contain and control their dogs. Yes, I think Angie Harmon was a bad dog owner. But to act like going straight to SHOOTING a dog because you feel threatened is a justified action is sick.
Per Angie's version of the story there was no wound on the delivery guy. Shoot a dog if you need to get it to let go of your leg. But shooting a dog because it barked aggressively at you and got close to you? Come on people, this is not reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Instacart drivers are not allowed to carry firearms per their rules.
Anonymous wrote:TIL all about the "black market" for delivery service accounts. I went down the rabbit hole and I am shocked! Who knew this was even that big of a thing?
There's account selling, account stealing & selling, dormant account takeover & lockout, sub-contracting out with an account (delivery pimping, ha).
I rarely use delivery services because I hate paying the excessive fees. If you use them a lot, do you notice the delivery person isn't the one on the account?
I have encountered this once with Lyft and I refused to get in the vehicle. Lyft support was helpful and told me I did the right thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I knew her story was fishy from the moment I read it. Obviously the Instacart shopper felt threatened in some way by her dog. Why was her dog loose in the first place when she was expecting a delivery? No sympathy from me. I wish pet owners would do better to keep their freaking dogs away from other people who may not like or be scared of dogs. So annoying!
No sympathy for the dog that got shot and killed? You are a heartless 'human'
Anonymous wrote:A few thoughts:
-app based food delivery seems like a terrible system for restaurants and drivers, leading to wide spread abuse
-no one should be carrying a gun while delivering food. Maybe pepper spray.
-train and restrain your animals to keep them AND OTHERS safe
This is a terrible combination of several people making bad choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
Anonymous wrote:I knew her story was fishy from the moment I read it. Obviously the Instacart shopper felt threatened in some way by her dog. Why was her dog loose in the first place when she was expecting a delivery? No sympathy from me. I wish pet owners would do better to keep their freaking dogs away from other people who may not like or be scared of dogs. So annoying!
Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
Anonymous wrote:TIL all about the "black market" for delivery service accounts. I went down the rabbit hole and I am shocked! Who knew this was even that big of a thing?
There's account selling, account stealing & selling, dormant account takeover & lockout, sub-contracting out with an account (delivery pimping, ha).
I rarely use delivery services because I hate paying the excessive fees. If you use them a lot, do you notice the delivery person isn't the one on the account?
Anonymous wrote:I knew her story was fishy from the moment I read it. Obviously the Instacart shopper felt threatened in some way by her dog. Why was her dog loose in the first place when she was expecting a delivery? No sympathy from me. I wish pet owners would do better to keep their freaking dogs away from other people who may not like or be scared of dogs. So annoying!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well the insta cart shopper has been fired. So the dog owner has her "justice".
He should sue for unlawful termination. All he did was defend himself in a dangerous situation. If the authorities found no cause to press charges, there is no justification for terminating him.
He was not legally authorized to work for Instacart, took on (bought, stole?) another person's account. People do this to bypass background checks because they would not qualify otherwise. The biggest takeaway from this story is these delivery drivers are actually not vetted and not safe. Get your own food!